10
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Datafication, dataism and dataveillance: Big Data between scientific paradigm and ideology

      Surveillance & Society
      Queen's University Library

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Metadata and data have become a regular currency for citizens to pay for their communication services and security—a trade-off that has nestled into the comfort zone of most people. This article deconstructs the ideological grounds of datafication. Datafication is rooted in problematic ontological and epistemological claims. As part of a larger social media logic, it shows characteristics of a widespread secular belief. Dataism, as this conviction is called, is so successful because masses of people — naively or unwittingly — trust their personal information to corporate platforms. The notion of trust becomes more problematic because people’s faith is extended to other public institutions (e.g. academic research and law enforcement) that handle their (meta)data. The interlocking of government, business, and academia in the adaptation of this ideology makes us want to look more critically at the entire ecosystem of connective media.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          Surveillance & Society
          SS
          Queen's University Library
          1477-7487
          May 15 2014
          May 09 2014
          : 12
          : 2
          : 197-208
          Article
          10.24908/ss.v12i2.4776
          7918763a-8ca9-45ca-9c04-f0fdf88c56ab
          © 2014
          History

          Comments

          Comment on this article