13
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Feasibility of a rapid diagnostic protocol for an emergency department chest pain unit.

      Annals of Emergency Medicine
      Acute Disease, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Algorithms, Chest Pain, economics, etiology, Chicago, Clinical Protocols, Cost-Benefit Analysis, Emergency Service, Hospital, standards, Feasibility Studies, Female, Hospital Bed Capacity, 500 and over, Hospitals, Municipal, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Models, Theoretical, Myocardial Infarction, complications, diagnosis, Outcome and Process Assessment (Health Care), Pain Clinics, Patient Selection, Risk, Risk Factors

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          To evaluate the applicability of a short-stay protocol for exclusion of acute ischemic heart disease without hospital admission and to analyze these results in the context of a conceptual model. An observational study of patients who presented with chest pain to the emergency department of an 886-bed inner-city municipal hospital and who needed hospital admission to rule out acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Patients were assessed by ED attending physicians to determine eligibility for an alternative, 12-hour protocol in an ED chest pain observation unit (CPOU) followed by immediate exercise testing. Outcome measures were proportion of patients eligible for the short-stay protocol, risk factor profile, and reasons for exclusion. Of 500 patients screened, 446 had sufficient data points to determine protocol eligibility. Of these, 238 (53.3%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 48.7% to 57.9%) were found to have low probability for AMI. After study exclusion criteria were applied to the patient cohort, 63 patients (14.1%; 95% CI, 10.9% to 17.3%) were eligible for the protocol. The most common reasons for exclusion were history of coronary artery disease (46%) and inability to perform an interpretable exercise tolerance test (42%). Although most admitted patients with chest pain (53%) were at low probability for AMI, only a minority (14%) were eligible for a short-stay protocol that required patients to be free of known coronary artery disease and able to perform an exercise tolerance test. Factors affecting the operations and efficiency of a CPOU include clinical characteristics of the target patient population, protocol tests used, and hospital occupancy and reimbursement patterns.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Comments

          Comment on this article