4
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Correction: Sarcopenia and sarcopenic obesity are independent adverse prognostic factors in resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma

      correction

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          There are errors in the author affiliations. The correct affiliations are as follows: Elisabeth S. Gruber1.3, Gerd Jomrich1,3, Dietmar Tamandl2, Michael Gnant3, Martin Schindl1,3, Klaus Sahora1,3 1 Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria, 2 Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria, 3 Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.

          Related collections

          Most cited references1

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          Sarcopenia and sarcopenic obesity are independent adverse prognostic factors in resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma

          Background Incidence and mortality of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) are on the rise. Sarcopenia and sarcopenic obesity have proven to be prognostic factors in different types of cancers. In the context of previous findings, we evaluated the impact of body composition in patients undergoing surgery in a national pancreatic center. Methods Patient’s body composition (n = 133) was analyzed on diagnostic CT scans and defined as follows: Skeletal muscle index ≤38.5 cm2/m2 (women), ≤52.4 cm2/m2 (men); obesity was classified as BMI ≥25kg/m2. Results Sarcopenia showed a negative impact on overall survival (OS; 14 vs. 20 months, p = 0.016). Sarcopenic patients suffering from obesity showed poorer OS compared to non-sarcopenic obese patients (14 vs. 23 months, p = 0.007). Both sarcopenia and sarcopenic obesity were associated with sex (p<0.001 and p = 0.006; males vs. females 20% vs. 38% and 12% vs. 38%, respectively); sarcopenia was further associated with neoadjuvant treatment (p = 0.025), tumor grade (p = 0.023), weight loss (p = 0.02) and nutritional depletion (albumin, p = 0.011) as well as low BMI (<25 kg/m2, p = 0.038). Sarcopenic obese patients showed higher incidence of major postoperative complications (p<0.001). In addition, sarcopenia proved as an independent prognostic factor for OS (p = 0.031) in the multivariable Cox Regression model. Conclusion Patients with sarcopenia and sarcopenic obesity undergoing resection for PDAC have a significantly shorter overall survival and a higher complication rate. The assessment of body composition in these patients may provide a broader understanding of patients’ individual condition and guide specific supportive strategies in patients at risk.
            Bookmark

            Author and article information

            Journal
            PLoS One
            PLoS One
            plos
            plosone
            PLoS ONE
            Public Library of Science (San Francisco, CA USA )
            1932-6203
            29 December 2020
            2020
            29 December 2020
            : 15
            : 12
            : e0244896
            Article
            PONE-D-20-39841
            10.1371/journal.pone.0244896
            7771687
            33373414
            792bacc3-a4d2-45ef-b486-5656d379eb82
            © 2020 Gruber et al

            This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

            History
            Page count
            Figures: 0, Tables: 0, Pages: 1
            Categories
            Correction

            Uncategorized
            Uncategorized

            Comments

            Comment on this article