0
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Inferior vena cava filters in pregnancy: Safe or sorry?

      review-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Potential hazards of vena cava filters include migration, tilt, perforation, fracture, and in-filter thrombosis. Due to physiological changes during pregnancy, the incidence of these complications might be different in pregnant women.

          Aim

          To evaluate the use and safety of inferior vena cava filters in both women who had an inferior vena cava filter inserted during pregnancy, and in women who became pregnant with an inferior vena cava filter in situ.

          Methods

          We performed two searches in the literature using the keywords “vena cava filter”, “pregnancy” and “obstetrics”.

          Results

          The literature search on women who had a filter inserted during pregnancy yielded 11 articles compiling data on 199 women. At least one filter complication was reported in 33/177 (19%) women and included in-filter thrombosis ( n = 14), tilt ( n = 6), migration ( n = 5), perforation ( n = 2), fracture ( n = 3), misplacement ( n = 1), air embolism ( n = 1) and allergic reaction ( n = 1). Two (1%) filter complications led to maternal deaths, of which at least one was directly associated with a filter insertion. Filter retrieval failed in 9/149 (6%) women. The search on women who became pregnant with a filter in situ resulted in data on 21 pregnancies in 14 women, of which one (6%) was complicated by uterine trauma, intraperitoneal hemorrhage and fetal death caused by perforation of the inferior vena cava filter.

          Conclusion

          The risks of filter complications in pregnancy are comparable to the nonpregnant population, but could lead to fetal or maternal death. Therefore, only in limited situations such as extensive thrombosis with a contraindication for anticoagulants, inferior vena filters should be considered in pregnant women.

          Related collections

          Most cited references78

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Antithrombotic Therapy for VTE Disease: CHEST Guideline and Expert Panel Report.

          We update recommendations on 12 topics that were in the 9th edition of these guidelines, and address 3 new topics.
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            American Society of Hematology 2020 guidelines for management of venous thromboembolism: treatment of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism

            Venous thromboembolism (VTE), which includes deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE), occurs in ∼1 to 2 individuals per 1000 each year, corresponding to ∼300 000 to 600 000 events in the United States annually. These evidence-based guidelines from the American Society of Hematology (ASH) intend to support patients, clinicians, and others in decisions about treatment of VTE. ASH formed a multidisciplinary guideline panel balanced to minimize potential bias from conflicts of interest. The McMaster University GRADE Centre supported the guideline development process, including updating or performing systematic evidence reviews. The panel prioritized clinical questions and outcomes according to their importance for clinicians and adult patients. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach was used to assess evidence and make recommendations, which were subject to public comment. The panel agreed on 28 recommendations for the initial management of VTE, primary treatment, secondary prevention, and treatment of recurrent VTE events. Strong recommendations include the use of thrombolytic therapy for patients with PE and hemodynamic compromise, use of an international normalized ratio (INR) range of 2.0 to 3.0 over a lower INR range for patients with VTE who use a vitamin K antagonist (VKA) for secondary prevention, and use of indefinite anticoagulation for patients with recurrent unprovoked VTE. Conditional recommendations include the preference for home treatment over hospital-based treatment for uncomplicated DVT and PE at low risk for complications and a preference for direct oral anticoagulants over VKA for primary treatment of VTE.
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              VTE, thrombophilia, antithrombotic therapy, and pregnancy: Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines.

              The use of anticoagulant therapy during pregnancy is challenging because of the potential for both fetal and maternal complications. This guideline focuses on the management of VTE and thrombophilia as well as the use of antithrombotic agents during pregnancy. The methods of this guideline follow the Methodology for the Development of Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis Guidelines: Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines in this supplement. We recommend low-molecular-weight heparin for the prevention and treatment of VTE in pregnant women instead of unfractionated heparin (Grade 1B). For pregnant women with acute VTE, we suggest that anticoagulants be continued for at least 6 weeks postpartum (for a minimum duration of therapy of 3 months) compared with shorter durations of treatment (Grade 2C). For women who fulfill the laboratory criteria for antiphospholipid antibody (APLA) syndrome and meet the clinical APLA criteria based on a history of three or more pregnancy losses, we recommend antepartum administration of prophylactic or intermediate-dose unfractionated heparin or prophylactic low-molecular-weight heparin combined with low-dose aspirin (75-100 mg/d) over no treatment (Grade 1B). For women with inherited thrombophilia and a history of pregnancy complications, we suggest not to use antithrombotic prophylaxis (Grade 2C). For women with two or more miscarriages but without APLA or thrombophilia, we recommend against antithrombotic prophylaxis (Grade 1B). Most recommendations in this guideline are based on observational studies and extrapolation from other populations. There is an urgent need for appropriately designed studies in this population.

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Front Cardiovasc Med
                Front Cardiovasc Med
                Front. Cardiovasc. Med.
                Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                2297-055X
                07 November 2022
                2022
                : 9
                : 1026002
                Affiliations
                [1] 1Department of Vascular Medicine, Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam , Amsterdam, Netherlands
                [2] 2Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Pulmonary Hypertension and Thrombosis , Amsterdam, Netherlands
                [3] 3INSERM, Clinical Investigator Center 1408 – Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Saint-Etienne , Saint-Etienne, France
                [4] 4F CRIN, INNOVTE Network , Saint-Etienne, France
                Author notes

                Edited by: Nicola Mumoli, ASST Ovest Milanese, Italy

                Reviewed by: Mi Zhou, Beijing Jishuitan Hospital, China; Mariam Shariff, Mayo Clinic, United States

                *Correspondence: Bernard Tardy bernardtardy@ 123456yahoo.fr

                This article was submitted to Thrombosis, a section of the journal Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine

                †ORCID: Ingrid M. Bistervels orcid.org/0000-0002-1155-4143

                Andrea Buchmüller orcid.org/0000-0002-4254-5362

                Article
                10.3389/fcvm.2022.1026002
                9676232
                36419489
                793bc454-83d0-4f65-bcd7-be1823afabe5
                Copyright © 2022 Bistervels, Buchmüller and Tardy.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 23 August 2022
                : 19 October 2022
                Page count
                Figures: 1, Tables: 3, Equations: 0, References: 80, Pages: 10, Words: 7179
                Categories
                Cardiovascular Medicine
                Mini Review

                venous thromboembolism,pregnancy,safety,anticoagulants,vena cava filter

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                Related Documents Log