3
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Clinical Pharmacokinetics of Drugs in Patients with Heart Failure : An Update (Part 1, Drugs Administered Intravenously)

      , ,
      Clinical Pharmacokinetics
      Springer Nature

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Heart failure is one of the leading causes of death in developed countries, and its prevalence is expected to increase further in the coming years. While the pharmacokinetic changes observed in patients with heart failure have been reviewed twice in Clinical Pharmacokinetics, approximately a quarter century has passed since the latest article was published in 1988. Since then, many important classes of agents (e.g. ACE inhibitors, angiotensin receptor antagonists and inotropes) have been introduced for the treatment of heart failure. The aim of the present article is to update the information regarding the pharmacokinetics of these drugs. For this purpose we have made a systematic survey of literature using MEDLINE, EMBASE and Japan Centra Revuo Medicina (in Japanese) and found a total of 111 relevant publications for 58 drugs. Heart failure is a pathophysiological state where the damaged heart, from whatever causes, no longer pumps enough blood for the needs of body tissues at rest or during the normal daily activities. The spectrum of heart failure ranges from acute decompensated heart failure (including circulatory shock) to chronic compensated or decompensated heart failure. Because hypoperfusion of organs may influence drug absorption from the gastrointestinal tract, distribution into tissues and elimination either by the liver or kidneys, it is conceivable that the pharmacokinetics of many drugs may be altered in patients with heart failure. The pharmacokinetic changes of drugs in these patients in the light of a physiologically based pharmacokinetic model are discussed, since this model can interpret altered pharmacokinetics in terms of changes in the binding of drugs in plasma and tissue, blood flow to drug-eliminating organs and intrinsic activity of drug elimination. Pharmacokinetic changes of drugs after intravenous administration are described here in Part 1 and those after oral administration will be discussed in Part 2 in a later issue of the Clinical Pharmacokinetics. Reviewing the retrieved data, it was considered that patients with asymptomatic or compensated chronic heart failure seem to have no or minimal alterations in the pharmacokinetics of parenterally administered drugs as long as there was no concurrent liver and/or kidney dysfunction. In contrast, it was found that the systemic clearance of at least six drugs (i.e. milrinone, carperitide, molsidomine, theophylline, ciclosporin and hydralazine) was reduced after intravenous administration by 50 % or more in patients with acute decompensated heart failure or chronic severe heart failure (New York Heart Association class III or IV) as compared with healthy subjects. Because there is a paucity of information regarding the pharmacokinetics of drugs in patients with severe heart failure, close attention should be paid to monitoring the efficacy of these agents and their associated adverse effects.

          Related collections

          Most cited references89

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Bioavailability, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of torsemide and furosemide in patients with congestive heart failure.

          The bioavailability, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of torsemide (10 mg orally and intravenously) and furosemide (40 mg orally and 20 mg intravenously) were determined in a randomized crossover clinical trial in 16 patients with compensated congestive heart failure. Torsemide (time to reach maximum concentration [tmax], 1.1 +/- 0.9 hour) was more rapidly absorbed than furosemide (tmax, 2.4 +/- 2.5 hours), the absorption of which was delayed compared with that in healthy volunteers. Bioavailability of torsemide was also greater and less variable than that of furosemide. All four treatments yielded comparable changes from baseline in 24-hour electrolyte excretion. Based on the relationships between sodium excretion rate and fractional sodium and urinary drug excretion rate, response to both diuretic agents at the level of the nephron was decreased compared with previous studies with healthy subjects. Assessment of the clinical relevance, if any, of the difference in the variability of absorption warrants further study.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            A comprehensive review of the loop diuretics: should furosemide be first line?

            To review the literature regarding the pharmacokinetic profiles, comparative safety and efficacy, and comparative costs of loop diuretics to evaluate the current clinical usefulness of furosemide. A search of MEDLINE (1966-June 2009) was conducted using the terms furosemide, torsemide, bumetanide, ethacrynic acid, and loop diuretics. Articles were limited to those written in English. All English-language articles identified from the data sources were reviewed. Studies were eligible if they encompassed pharmacokinetics, comparative safety and efficacy, or comparative costs of the loop diuretics. In patients with heart failure (HF), torsemide demonstrated decreased mortality compared with furosemide in 1 study (2.2% vs 4.5% in the furosemide group; p < 0.05), decreased hospitalizations in 1 study (23 in the torsemide group vs 61 in the furosemide group; p < 0.01), and improved New York Heart Association functional classifications in 2 studies. In the first, 45.8% with torsemide versus 37.2% with furosemide demonstrated improvement in at least one functional class (p = 0.00017). In the second, 40.2% with torsemide and 30.7% with furosemide demonstrated improvement in at least one functional class (p = 0.014). In 2 of 3 studies of patients with cirrhosis, torsemide increased natriuresis and total volume diuresed compared with furosemide in patients with cirrhosis; however, no significant difference between the agents with respect to plasma renin and aldosterone concentrations was demonstrated. In patients with pulmonary hypertension, central venous pressure, capillary wedge pressure, and stroke volume significantly improved from baseline among patients who received torsemide, but not in those who received furosemide, although the intergroup analysis failed to reach statistical significance. Among patients with chronic kidney disease, no significant differences were noted with respect to natriuresis and blood pressure control between the 2 agents; however, in patients with acute kidney injury, patients who received furosemide had a significant improvement in urine output versus the torsemide group. Additionally, 2 trials comparing bumetanide with furosemide were identified, although the results were conflicting. In patients with nephrotic syndrome, bumetanide significantly improved weight loss in the first 4 weeks and in week 20, compared with furosemide. In patients with HF, significant improvement in dyspnea at rest and on exertion was exhibited in the bumetanide group, but not in the furosemide group; no significant difference was noted between the 2 groups when evaluating global assessment. Growing evidence demonstrates more favorable pharmacokinetic profiles of torsemide and bumetanide compared with furosemide. Furthermore, torsemide may be more efficacious and safer than furosemide in patients with HF. A trial comparing all 3 drugs would be required to confirm torsemide as the primary loop diuretic in patients with HF, but based upon limited current evidence, we recommend torsemide over furosemide. Currently, little evidence exists to support either torsemide or bumetanide as first-line treatment over furosemide in patients with other edematous disease states.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Pharmacokinetics of losartan, an angiotensin II receptor antagonist, and its active metabolite EXP3174 in humans.

              The pharmacokinetics of the angiotensin II receptor antagonist losartan potassium and its active carboxylic acid metabolite EXP3174 were characterized in 18 healthy male subjects after administration of intravenous losartan, intravenous EXP3174, and oral losartan. In these subjects, the average plasma clearance of losartan was 610 ml/min, and the volume of distribution was 34 L. Renal clearance (70 ml/min) accounted for 12% of plasma clearance. Terminal half-life was 2.1 hours. In contrast, the average plasma clearance of EXP3174 was 47 ml/min, and its volume of distribution was 10 L. Renal clearance was 26 ml/min, which accounted for 55% of plasma clearance; terminal half-life was 6.3 hours. After oral administration of losartan, peak concentrations of losartan were reached in 1 hour. Peak concentrations of EXP3174 were reached in 3 1/2 hours. The area under the plasma concentration-time curve of EXP3174 was about four times that of losartan. The oral bioavailability of losartan tablets was 33%. The low bioavailability was mainly attributable to first-pass metabolism. After intravenous or oral administration of losartan the conversion of losartan to the metabolite EXP3174 was 14%.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Clinical Pharmacokinetics
                Clin Pharmacokinet
                Springer Nature
                0312-5963
                1179-1926
                March 2013
                January 2013
                : 52
                : 3
                : 169-185
                Article
                10.1007/s40262-012-0029-2
                23344981
                7940149a-2ed6-4dcd-9cca-6ffde4c08175
                © 2013
                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article