3
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Individual Preferences for COVID-19 Vaccination in China

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Vaccinations are an effective choice to stop disease outbreaks, including COVID-19. There is little research on individuals' COVID-19 vaccination decision-making.

          Objective

          We aimed to determine individual preferences for COVID-19 vaccinations in China, and to assess the factors influencing vaccination decision-making to facilitate vaccination coverage.

          Methods

          A D-efficient discrete choice experiment was conducted across six Chinese provinces selected by the stratified random sampling method. Vaccine choice sets were constructed using seven attributes: vaccine effectiveness, side-effects, accessibility, number of doses, vaccination sites, duration of vaccine protection, and proportion of acquaintances vaccinated. Conditional logit and latent class models were used to identify preferences.

          Results

          Although all seven attributes were proved to significantly influence respondents’ vaccination decision, vaccine effectiveness, side-effects and proportion of acquaintances vaccinated were the most important. We also found a higher probability of vaccinating when the vaccine was more effective; risks of serious side effects were small; vaccinations were free and voluntary; the fewer the number of doses; the longer the protection duration; and the higher the proportion of acquaintances vaccinated. Higher local vaccine coverage created altruistic herd incentives to vaccinate rather than free-rider problems. The predicted vaccination uptake of the optimal vaccination scenario in our study was 84.77%. Preference heterogeneity was substantial. Individuals who were older, had a lower education level, lower income, higher trust in the vaccine and higher perceived risk of infection, displayed a higher probability to vaccinate.

          Conclusions

          Preference heterogeneity among individuals should lead health authorities to address the diversity of expectations about COVID-19 vaccinations. To maximize COVID-19 vaccine uptake, health authorities should promote vaccine effectiveness; pro-actively communicate the absence or presence of vaccine side effects; and ensure rapid and wide media communication about local vaccine coverage.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          Vaccine
          Vaccine
          Vaccine
          The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.
          0264-410X
          1873-2518
          5 December 2020
          5 December 2020
          Affiliations
          [a ]School of Political Science and Public Administration, Institute of Governance, Shandong University,72 Binhai Rd, Qingdao, Shandong 266237,China
          [b ]School of Management, University of Liverpool, Chatham Building, Chatham Street, Liverpool L697ZH, England
          [c ]University of Melbourne,369 Abbotsford street North Melbourne VIC,3051, Australia
          [d ]Australian National Institute of Management and Commerce,1 Central Avenue Australian Technology Park, Eveleigh Sydney NSW 2015, Australia
          [e ]Newcastle Business School, University of Newcastle, University Drive, Newcastle, NSW 2308, Australia
          [f ]School of Health Policy & Management, Nanjing Medical University, No. 101 Longmian Avenue, Jiangning District, Nanjing, 211166, PRC
          [g ]Dong Fureng Institute of Economic and Social Development, Wuhan University, 54 Dongsi Lishi Hutong, Beijing, 100010, China
          [h ]Center for Health Economics and Management at School of Economics and Management, Wuhan University, Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei Province, P.R.China. 430072
          Author notes
          [* ]Corresponding author.
          Article
          S0264-410X(20)31576-0
          10.1016/j.vaccine.2020.12.009
          7719001
          33328140
          79505791-bf27-4bda-8962-62340fc8ac5a
          © 2020 The Author(s)

          Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.

          History
          : 27 August 2020
          : 29 November 2020
          : 2 December 2020
          Categories
          Article

          Infectious disease & Microbiology
          covid-19,preference,vaccine,health policy
          Infectious disease & Microbiology
          covid-19, preference, vaccine, health policy

          Comments

          Comment on this article