Blog
About

13
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Inter-rater reliability of the Foot Posture Index (FPI-6) in the assessment of the paediatric foot

      , 1 , 1

      Journal of Foot and Ankle Research

      BioMed Central

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Reliability is an integral component of clinical assessment and necessary for establishing baseline data, monitoring treatment outcomes and providing robust research findings. In the podiatric literature traditional measures of foot assessment have been shown to be largely unreliable. The Foot Posture Index (FPI-6) is a clinical tool used in the assessment of foot and to date, there is limited research published which evaluates the reliability of this tool in children and adolescents.

          Method

          Thirty participants aged 5 - 16 years were recruited for the research. Two raters independently recorded the FPI-6 score for each participant.

          Results

          Almost perfect agreement between the two raters was identified following weighted kappa analysis (Kw = 0.86).

          Conclusion

          The FPI-6 is a quick, simple and reliable clinical tool which has demonstrated excellent inter-rater reliability when used in the assessment of the paediatric foot.

          Related collections

          Most cited references 17

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data.

           G Koch,  J R Landis (1977)
          This paper presents a general statistical methodology for the analysis of multivariate categorical data arising from observer reliability studies. The procedure essentially involves the construction of functions of the observed proportions which are directed at the extent to which the observers agree among themselves and the construction of test statistics for hypotheses involving these functions. Tests for interobserver bias are presented in terms of first-order marginal homogeneity and measures of interobserver agreement are developed as generalized kappa-type statistics. These procedures are illustrated with a clinical diagnosis example from the epidemiological literature.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data

               JR Landis,  GG Koch (1977)
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Affiliations
                [1 ]The University of East London, Stratford Campus, Water Lane, London, E15 4LZ, UK
                Contributors
                Journal
                J Foot Ankle Res
                Journal of Foot and Ankle Research
                BioMed Central
                1757-1146
                2009
                21 October 2009
                : 2
                : 26
                2770503
                1757-1146-2-26
                19845961
                10.1186/1757-1146-2-26
                Copyright © 2009 Morrison and Ferrari; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                Categories
                Research

                Orthopedics

                Comments

                Comment on this article