11
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Multicenter Trial of a Tubeless, On-Body Automated Insulin Delivery System With Customizable Glycemic Targets in Pediatric and Adult Participants With Type 1 Diabetes

      research-article
      1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 11 , 2 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , *
      (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab), (Collab)
      Diabetes Care
      American Diabetes Association

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          OBJECTIVE

          Advances in diabetes technology have transformed the treatment paradigm for type 1 diabetes, yet the burden of disease is significant. We report on a pivotal safety study of the first tubeless, on-body automated insulin delivery system with customizable glycemic targets.

          RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

          This single-arm, multicenter, prospective study enrolled 112 children (age 6–13.9 years) and 129 adults (age 14–70 years). A 2-week standard therapy phase (usual insulin regimen) was followed by 3 months of automated insulin delivery. Primary safety outcomes were incidence of severe hypoglycemia and diabetic ketoacidosis. Primary effectiveness outcomes were change in HbA 1c and percent time in sensor glucose range 70–180 mg/dL (“time in range”).

          RESULTS

          A total of 235 participants (98% of enrolled, including 111 children and 124 adults) completed the study. HbA 1c was significantly reduced in children by 0.71% (7.8 mmol/mol) (mean ± SD: 7.67 ± 0.95% to 6.99 ± 0.63% [60 ± 10.4 mmol/mol to 53 ± 6.9 mmol/mol], P < 0.0001) and in adults by 0.38% (4.2 mmol/mol) (7.16 ± 0.86% to 6.78 ± 0.68% [55 ± 9.4 mmol/mol to 51 ± 7.4 mmol/mol], P < 0.0001). Time in range was improved from standard therapy by 15.6 ± 11.5% or 3.7 h/day in children and 9.3 ± 11.8% or 2.2 h/day in adults (both P < 0.0001). This was accomplished with a reduction in time in hypoglycemia <70 mg/dL among adults (median [interquartile range]: 2.00% [0.63, 4.06] to 1.09% [0.46, 1.75], P < 0.0001), while this parameter remained the same in children. There were three severe hypoglycemia events not attributable to automated insulin delivery malfunction and one diabetic ketoacidosis event from an infusion site failure.

          CONCLUSIONS

          This tubeless automated insulin delivery system was safe and allowed participants to significantly improve HbA 1c levels and time in target glucose range with a very low occurrence of hypoglycemia.

          Related collections

          Most cited references22

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The Effect of Intensive Treatment of Diabetes on the Development and Progression of Long-Term Complications in Insulin-Dependent Diabetes Mellitus

          Long-term microvascular and neurologic complications cause major morbidity and mortality in patients with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM). We examined whether intensive treatment with the goal of maintaining blood glucose concentrations close to the normal range could decrease the frequency and severity of these complications. A total of 1441 patients with IDDM--726 with no retinopathy at base line (the primary-prevention cohort) and 715 with mild retinopathy (the secondary-intervention cohort) were randomly assigned to intensive therapy administered either with an external insulin pump or by three or more daily insulin injections and guided by frequent blood glucose monitoring or to conventional therapy with one or two daily insulin injections. The patients were followed for a mean of 6.5 years, and the appearance and progression of retinopathy and other complications were assessed regularly. In the primary-prevention cohort, intensive therapy reduced the adjusted mean risk for the development of retinopathy by 76 percent (95 percent confidence interval, 62 to 85 percent), as compared with conventional therapy. In the secondary-intervention cohort, intensive therapy slowed the progression of retinopathy by 54 percent (95 percent confidence interval, 39 to 66 percent) and reduced the development of proliferative or severe nonproliferative retinopathy by 47 percent (95 percent confidence interval, 14 to 67 percent). In the two cohorts combined, intensive therapy reduced the occurrence of microalbuminuria (urinary albumin excretion of > or = 40 mg per 24 hours) by 39 percent (95 percent confidence interval, 21 to 52 percent), that of albuminuria (urinary albumin excretion of > or = 300 mg per 24 hours) by 54 percent (95 percent confidence interval 19 to 74 percent), and that of clinical neuropathy by 60 percent (95 percent confidence interval, 38 to 74 percent). The chief adverse event associated with intensive therapy was a two-to-threefold increase in severe hypoglycemia. Intensive therapy effectively delays the onset and slows the progression of diabetic retinopathy, nephropathy, and neuropathy in patients with IDDM.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Clinical Targets for Continuous Glucose Monitoring Data Interpretation: Recommendations From the International Consensus on Time in Range

            Improvements in sensor accuracy, greater convenience and ease of use, and expanding reimbursement have led to growing adoption of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM). However, successful utilization of CGM technology in routine clinical practice remains relatively low. This may be due in part to the lack of clear and agreed-upon glycemic targets that both diabetes teams and people with diabetes can work toward. Although unified recommendations for use of key CGM metrics have been established in three separate peer-reviewed articles, formal adoption by diabetes professional organizations and guidance in the practical application of these metrics in clinical practice have been lacking. In February 2019, the Advanced Technologies & Treatments for Diabetes (ATTD) Congress convened an international panel of physicians, researchers, and individuals with diabetes who are expert in CGM technologies to address this issue. This article summarizes the ATTD consensus recommendations for relevant aspects of CGM data utilization and reporting among the various diabetes populations.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              State of Type 1 Diabetes Management and Outcomes from the T1D Exchange in 2016–2018

              To provide a snapshot of the profile of adults and youth with type 1 diabetes (T1D) in the United States and assessment of longitudinal changes in T1D management and clinical outcomes in the T1D Exchange registry.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                On behalf of : for the Omnipod 5 Research Group
                Journal
                Diabetes Care
                Diabetes Care
                diacare
                dcare
                Diabetes Care
                Diabetes Care
                American Diabetes Association
                0149-5992
                1935-5548
                July 2021
                20 July 2021
                20 July 2021
                : 44
                : 7
                : 1630-1640
                Affiliations
                [1] 1Division of Endocrinology, Center for Diabetes Technology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA
                [2] 2Barbara Davis Center for Diabetes, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO
                [3] 3Atlanta Diabetes Associates, Atlanta, GA
                [4] 4Sansum Diabetes Research Institute, Santa Barbara, CA
                [5] 5Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY
                [6] 6International Diabetes Center, Park Nicollet Pediatric Endocrinology, Minneapolis, MN
                [7] 7Department of Pediatrics, SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY
                [8] 8Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
                [9] 9International Diabetes Center, Park Nicollet, HealthPartners, Minneapolis, MN
                [10] 10Department of Pediatrics, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT
                [11] 11Joslin Diabetes Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
                [12] 12Department of Research, Iowa Diabetes Research, West Des Moines, IA
                [13] 13Department of Medicine, SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY
                [14] 14Department of Pediatrics, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Rainbow Babies and Children’s Hospital, Cleveland, OH
                [15] 15Department of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX
                [16] 16Department of Research, East Coast Institute for Research at The Jones Center, Macon, GA
                [17] 17Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL
                [18] 18Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Endocrinology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA
                [19] 19Insulet Corporation, Acton, MA
                Author notes
                Corresponding author: Trang T. Ly, tly@ 123456insulet.com
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4080-9034
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3492-2578
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1675-8417
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9050-5584
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9301-3043
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6059-4611
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9675-3001
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3827-7107
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5859-5666
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0440-3339
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1644-5947
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5995-1447
                Article
                210172
                10.2337/dc21-0172
                8323171
                34099518
                7991bbaf-2f8e-46b8-939e-d9ae114dab9f
                © 2021 by the American Diabetes Association

                Readers may use this article as long as the work is properly cited, the use is educational and not for profit, and the work is not altered. More information is available at https://www.diabetesjournals.org/content/license.

                History
                : 21 January 2021
                : 14 April 2021
                Page count
                Figures: 2, Tables: 2, Equations: 0, References: 23, Pages: 11
                Categories
                Emerging Technologies: Data Systems and Devices

                Endocrinology & Diabetes
                Endocrinology & Diabetes

                Comments

                Comment on this article