18
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Fungicide and Cultivar Effects on Sudden Death Syndrome and Yield of Soybean

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Related collections

          Most cited references38

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Stage of Development Descriptions for Soybeans, Glycine Max (L.) Merrill1

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Efficacy of triazole-based fungicides for fusarium head blight and deoxynivalenol control in wheat: a multivariate meta-analysis.

            The effects of propiconazole, prothioconazole, tebuconazole, metconazole, and prothioconazole+tebuconazole (as a tank mix or a formulated premix) on the control of Fusarium head blight index (IND; field or plot-level disease severity) and deoxynivalenol (DON) in wheat were determined. A multivariate random-effects meta-analytical model was fitted to the log-transformed treatment means from over 100 uniform fungicide studies across 11 years and 14 states, and the mean log ratio (relative to the untreated check or tebuconazole mean) was determined as the overall effect size for quantifying fungicide efficacy. Mean log ratios were then transformed to estimate mean percent reduction in IND and DON relative to the untreated check (percent control: C(IND) and C(DON)) and relative to tebuconazole. All fungicides led to a significant reduction in IND and DON (P < 0.001), although there was substantial between-study variability. Prothioconazole+tebuconazole was the most effective fungicide for IND, with a C(IND) of 52%, followed by metconazole (50%), prothioconazole (48%), tebuconazole (40%), and propiconazole (32%). For DON, metconazole was the most effective treatment, with a [Formula: see text](DON) of 45%; prothioconazole+tebuconazole and prothioconazole showed similar efficacy, with C(DON) values of 42 and 43%, respectively; tebuconazole and propiconazole were the least effective, with C(DON) values of 23 and 12%, respectively. All fungicides, with the exception of propiconazole, were significantly more effective than tebuconazole for control of both IND and DON (P < 0.001). Relative to tebuconazole, prothioconazole, metconazole, and tebuconzole+prothioconzole reduced disease index a further 14 to 20% and DON a further 25 to 29%. In general, fungicide efficacy was significantly higher for spring wheat than for soft winter wheat studies; depending on the fungicide, the difference in percent control between spring and soft winter wheat was 5 to 20% for C(IND) and 7 to 16% for C(DON). Based on the mean log ratios and between-study variances, the probability that IND or DON in a treated plot from a randomly selected study was lower than that in the check by a fixed margin was determined, which confirmed the superior efficacy of prothioconazole, metconazole, and tebuconzole+prothioconzole for Fusarium head blight disease and toxin control.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Sudden Death Syndrome of Soybean

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Plant Disease
                Plant Disease
                Scientific Societies
                0191-2917
                July 2016
                July 2016
                : 100
                : 7
                : 1339-1350
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Plant Pathology and Microbiology, Iowa State University, Ames 50011
                [2 ]Department of Botany and Plant Pathology, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907
                [3 ]Department of Crop Sciences, University of Illinois, Urbana 61801
                [4 ]Department of Plant, Soil and Microbial Sciences, Michigan State University, East Lansing 48824
                [5 ]Ontario Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs, Ridgetown, ON N0P2C0, Canada
                [6 ]Department of Plant Pathology and Microbiology, Iowa State University, Ames
                Article
                10.1094/PDIS-11-15-1263-RE
                79961d17-fb1b-45b0-ad73-95ed82cc479f
                © 2016
                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article