16
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Dating the Expansion of the Inca Empire: Bayesian Models from Ecuador and Argentina

      , , ,
      Radiocarbon
      Cambridge University Press (CUP)

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The chronology of the Inca Empire has traditionally relied on ethnohistoric dates, which suggest that a northern expansion into modern Ecuador began in AD 1463 and a southern expansion into modern Argentina began in AD 1471. We test the validity of these dates with two Bayesian models, which show that the ethnohistoric dates are incorrect and that the southern expansion began before the northern one. The first model of seven dates shows that the site of Chamical, Ecuador, was first occupied cal AD 1410–1480 (95% probability)and has a high probability of being built prior to the ethnohistoric date. The second is an outlier model of 26 14C dates and 19 thermoluminescence (TL) dates from 10 sites along the empire’s southeastern limit in northwestern Mendoza, Argentina. Here, the Inca occupation began cal AD 1350–1440 (95% probability), also earlier than the ethnohistoric date. The model also suggests that the Inca occupation of Mendoza lasted 70–230 yr (95% probability), longer than previously thought, which calls for new perspectives on the timing and nature of Inca conquests and relationships with local groups. Based on these results, we argue it is time to abandon the traditional chronology in favor of Inca chronologies based on Bayesian models.

          Related collections

          Most cited references92

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Bayesian Analysis of Radiocarbon Dates

            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            IntCal13 and Marine13 Radiocarbon Age Calibration Curves 0–50,000 Years cal BP

              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Dealing with Outliers and Offsets in Radiocarbon Dating

              The wide availability of precise radiocarbon dates has allowed researchers in a number of disciplines to address chronological questions at a resolution which was not possible 10 or 20 years ago. The use of Bayesian statistics for the analysis of groups of dates is becoming a common way to integrate all of the14C evidence together. However, the models most often used make a number of assumptions that may not always be appropriate. In particular, there is an assumption that all of the14C measurements are correct in their context and that the original14C concentration of the sample is properly represented by the calibration curve.

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Radiocarbon
                Radiocarbon
                Cambridge University Press (CUP)
                0033-8222
                1945-5755
                February 2017
                January 30 2017
                February 2017
                : 59
                : 1
                : 117-140
                Article
                10.1017/RDC.2016.118
                799aee57-de47-4b60-a9f5-cb303217e9f0
                © 2017

                https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                Related Documents Log