Through their long exposure and experience with natural resources, many local communities
in Latin America have developed health care practices. Thousands of years of observation
and experimentation have helped in developing different empirical medical systems,
as well as knowledge of plants, animals, and minerals. Such knowledge is the subject
of medical ethnobiology and ethnopharmacology, disciplines that before being exclusive
actually complemented each other. In the broadest sense, both medical ethnobiology
and ethnopharmacology attempt to make sense and to understand traditional medical
systems: the first from perceptions, healing strategies, natural resources used to
fight diseases or maintain health; the second from traditional medicines, either plants,
animals, or minerals.
We can find new and different types of approaches and theoretical and methodological
developments such as ethnopharmacological evaluations of traditional drugs unknown
so far; the inclusion of historical perspective in ethnopharmacological studies; the
migration influence on traditional medical systems both in industrialized countries
and remote locations, or a greater focus on urban contexts in ethnopharmacology. Moreover,
the integrative aspect is noteworthy; it includes medical ethnobotany and zootherapy
(the treatment of human diseases using drug-based therapies derived from animals).
Recent developments in methods and theory, like any evolving discipline, promote discussions
of theoretical scenarios and help us understand the contexts of traditional medical
systems as well as methods and techniques that enable access to these systems. Perhaps,
a very common approach has been the development of quantitative techniques to access
information about animals and plants used in these medical systems, in order to constitute
a way to objectively select resources for phytochemical and pharmacological studies.
Ethnopharmacological evaluations of traditional drugs is perhaps an approach that
concentrates most investigations, focusing on an assessment of traditional preparations
regarding their effectiveness. Both animals and plants provide extensive resources
for new Complementary and Alternative Medicine (CAM) approaches which may prove important
for future applications. Despite criticism about errors in experimentation and data
interpretation this approach has proven useful.
The historical perspective of ethnopharmacology has focused on the medicinal use of
natural products that has preceded recorded human history probably by thousands of
years. Surveys of those medicaments used in the past show that whereas compounders
of medicines have invariably used vegetable, animal, and mineral substances, animals
are less prevalent than herbs, and more prevalent than minerals. Historical texts
showed that the treatment of illnesses using animal-based remedies is an extremely
old practice. Animal-based remedies have constituted part of the inventory of medicinal
substances used in various cultures since ancient times. Until now, studies concerning
diversity of plants and animals used in medical systems of immigrants have occupied
little space in the ethnopharmacological literature. Thus there has been influence
of migration on traditional medical systems. Ethnobiological studies have shown that
the natural product diversity used by people arises from a number of learning strategies,
both simple and complex and that sophisticated social learning in particular plays
a key role in transmitting variation in behavior between generations.
Medical ethnobotany and zootherapy constitutes an important alternative among many
other known therapies practiced worldwide. There is growing recognition that people
in different parts of the world still use animal-and plant-based remedies as primary
or complementary medicine. Probably the most famous of these are the Chinese, who
use animals for a variety of ailments. Lesser known and studied, though just as varied
and rich is Latin America's and Africa long tradition of animal remedies for all kinds
of ailments. For example, in Traditional Chinese Medicine, more than 1500 animal species
have been recorded to be of some medicinal use. In Brazil, at least 326 medicinal
animals have been recorded, and at least 584 animal species, in Latin America. Using
plants and animals for medicinal purposes is part of a body of traditional knowledge
which is becoming increasingly more relevant to discussions on conservation biology,
public health policies, and sustainable management of natural resources, biological
prospection, and patents. Ethnopharmacology in urban contexts while expanding in most
of the world continue to supplement limited public health facilities and more expensive
commercially produced medications with popular remedies; this has led to an increasing
demand for wildlife products for medicinal purposes in urban areas. A reflection is
the widespread trade in medicinal plants and animals, mainly concentrated in local
and traditional market in urban areas.
This Special Issue of 22 peer-reviewed papers include in this collection various dimensions
of the constitutional process of healing practices through the use of plants and animals
that local communities in Latin America developed over centuries of experimentation.
The papers explore different aspects of the empirical use of natural resources including
the cultural dimensions that influence the extraction of natural products, evaluation
of medicinal efficacy of these products; intermedical character of traditional medical
systems; application of fossils in folk medicine. All these researches highlight the
importance of local perceptions and knowledge as potential information that can contribute
to future applications and therefore as a new source of medicines from natural products.