250
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Continued Vigilance – Development of an Online Evaluation Tool for Assessing Preparedness of Medical Facilities for Biological Events

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Objective: Effective response to biological events necessitates ongoing evaluation of preparedness. This study was a bilateral German–Israeli collaboration aimed at developing an evaluation tool for assessing preparedness of medical facilities for biological events.

          Methods: Measurable parameters were identified through a literature review for inclusion in the evaluation tool and disseminated to 228 content experts in two modified Delphi cycles. Focus groups were conducted to identify psychosocial needs of the medical teams. Table-top and functional exercises were implemented to review applicability of the tool.

          Results: One hundred seventeen experts from Germany and Israel participated in the modified Delphi. Out of 188 parameters that were identified, 183 achieved a consensus of >75% of the content experts. Following comments recommended in the Delphi cycles, and feedback from focus groups and hospital exercises, the final tool consisted of 172 parameters. Median level of importance of each parameter was calculated based on ranking recommended in the Delphi process. Computerized web-based software was developed to calculate scores of preparedness for biological events.

          Conclusion: Ongoing evaluation means, such as the tool developed in the study, can facilitate the need for a valid and reliable mechanism that may be widely adopted and implemented as quality assurance measures. The tool is based on measurable parameters and indicators that can effectively present strengths and weaknesses in managing a response to a public health threat, and accordingly, steps can be implemented to improve readiness. Adoption of such a tool is an important component of assuring public health and effective emergency management.

          Related collections

          Most cited references13

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          The Delphi method as a research tool: an example, design considerations and applications

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Measuring revealed and emergent vulnerabilities of coastal communities to tsunami in Sri Lanka.

            This paper presents the important findings of a study undertaken in two selected tsunami-affected coastal cities in Sri Lanka (Batticaloa and Galle) to measure the revealed and emergent vulnerability of coastal communities. International risk studies have failed to demonstrate the high vulnerability of coastal communities to tsunami in Sri Lanka. Therefore, indirect assessment tools to measure pre-event vulnerability have to be complemented by assessment tools that analyse revealed and emergent vulnerability in looking at the aftermath and impact patterns of a real scenario, as well as in examining the dynamics of disaster recovery in which different vulnerabilities can be identified. The paper first presents a conceptual framework for capturing vulnerability within a process-oriented approach linked to sustainable development. Next, it highlights selected indicators and methods to measure revealed and emergent vulnerability at the local level using the examples of Batticaloa and Galle. Finally, it discusses the usefulness and application of vulnerability indicators within the framework of reconstruction.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Developing a health system approach to disaster management: A qualitative analysis of the core literature to complement the WHO Toolkit for assessing health-system capacity for crisis management

              BACKGROUND The World Health Organisation's (WHO) sixty-fourth World Health Assembly in May 2011 adopted a resolution on ‘strengthening national health emergency and disaster management capacities and resilience of health systems’. Disaster management is a topical issue globally and countries are being encouraged to improve their disaster preparedness, along with growing international commitment to strengthening health systems. Lessons identified from disasters have not been effectively collated; essential experience is forgotten. METHODS This paper describes the analysis of the worldwide experience of disasters through a health systems approach. A systematic search of the core literature from January 2000 to November 2011 was conducted. Components drawn from the WHO’s Global assessment of national health sector emergency preparedness and response baseline survey were combined with WHO’s six health system building blocks (or levers) to act as the initial analysis anchors, with a further grounded theory qualitative analysis of the literature allowing the identification of emerging themes and insights. The priority areas identified by this literature review were then compared with the topics covered by the new expert-consensus-derived Toolkit for assessing health-system capacity for crisis management developed by the WHO Regional Office for Europe. FINDINGS 143 publications identified from a literature search were analysed and appraised. Themes and examples from the literature demonstrate how health system strengthening should contribute to disaster management. Priority areas under-represented in the WHO Toolkit and identified by the qualitative analysis are discussed. INTERPRETATION Collation and analysis of the disaster management literature identifies how health system strengthening can promote resilience and efficient recovery in the face of disasters. These findings support and complement the WHO Toolkit. Countries can use the literature evidence with the WHO Toolkit to assess their disaster management capacities and identify priorities for strengthening their health system. Citation: Bayntun C, Rockenschaub G, Murray V. Developing a health system approach to disaster management: A qualitative analysis of the core literature to complement the WHO Toolkit for assessing health-system capacity for crisis management. PLOS Currents Disasters. 2012 Aug 22. doi: 10.1371/5028b6037259a.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Front Public Health
                Front Public Health
                Front. Public Health
                Frontiers in Public Health
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                2296-2565
                19 March 2014
                14 April 2014
                2014
                : 2
                : 35
                Affiliations
                [1] 1Prepared Research Center, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev , Beer Sheva, Israel
                [2] 2Ministry of Health , Tel Aviv, Israel
                [3] 3Robert Koch Institute , Berlin, Germany
                [4] 4Municipal Hospitals , Mönchengladbach, Germany
                [5] 5Health Protection Authority , Frankfurt, Germany
                [6] 6CSO GmbH Software Solutions , Pforzheim, Germany
                [7] 7University Hospital Goethe-University , Frankfurt, Germany
                Author notes

                Edited by: Randy D. Kearns, University of North Carolina, USA

                Reviewed by: Joaquim Michael Havens, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, USA; Pertti Juhani Hakkinen, National Institutes of Health, USA

                *Correspondence: Bruria Adini, Prepared Research Center, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, P.O. Box 653, Beer Sheva 8410501, Israel e-mail: adinib@ 123456bgu.ac.il

                This article was submitted to Disaster and Emergency Medicine, a section of the journal Frontiers in Public Health.

                Article
                10.3389/fpubh.2014.00035
                3995059
                24783192
                7a0fde86-47b6-41dd-8652-1a2d32f7ea54
                Copyright © 2014 Adini, Verbeek, Trapp, Schilling, Sasse, Pientka, Böddinghaus, Schaefer, Schempf, Brodt, Wegner, Lev, Laor, Gottschalk and Biederbick.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 20 February 2014
                : 01 April 2014
                Page count
                Figures: 2, Tables: 3, Equations: 0, References: 24, Pages: 8, Words: 5732
                Categories
                Public Health
                Original Research

                standard operating procedures,measurable indicators,biological event,evaluation of emergency preparedness,disaster management

                Comments

                Comment on this article