36
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Intensivist supervision of resident-placed central venous catheters decreases the incidence of catheter-related blood stream infections

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Catheter-related blood stream infections (CRBSI) cause significant morbidity and mortality. A retrospective study of a performance improvement project in our teaching hospital's surgical intensive care unit (SICU) showed that intensivist supervision was important in reinforcing maximal sterile barriers (MSB) use during the placement of a central venous catheter (CVC) in the prevention of CRBSI. A historical control period, 1 January 2001–31 December 2003, was established for comparison. From 1 January 2003–31 December 2007, MSB use for central venous line placement was mandated for all operators. However, in 2003 there was no intensivist supervision of CVC placements in the SICU. The use of MSB alone did not cause a significant change in the CRBSI rate in the first year of the project, but close supervision by an intensivist in years 2004–2007, in conjunction with MSB use, demonstrated a significant drop in the CRBSI rate when compared to the years before intensivist supervision (2001–2003), p < .0001. A time series analysis comparing monthly rates of CRBSI (2001–2007) also revealed a significant downward trend, p = .028. Additionally, in the first year of the mandated MSB use (2003), 85 independently observed resident-placed CVCs demonstrated that breaks in sterile technique (34/85), as compared those placements that had no breaks in technique (51/85), had more CRBSI, 6/34 (17.6%) vs. 1/51 (1.9%), p < .01. Interventions to reduce CRBSI in our SICU needed emphasis on adequate supervision of trainees in CVC placement, in addition to use of MSB, to effect lower CRBSI rates.

          Related collections

          Most cited references12

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Guidelines for the prevention of intravascular catheter-related infections.

          Although many catheter-related bloodstream infections (CR-BSIs) are preventable, measures to reduce these infections are not uniformly implemented. To update an existing evidenced-based guideline that promotes strategies to prevent CR-BSIs. The MEDLINE database, conference proceedings, and bibliographies of review articles and book chapters were searched for relevant articles.Studies Included: Laboratory-based studies, controlled clinical trials, prospective interventional trials, and epidemiological investigations. Reduction in CR-BSI, catheter colonization, or catheter-related infection. The recommended preventive strategies with the strongest supportive evidence are education and training of healthcare providers who insert and maintain catheters; maximal sterile barrier precautions during central venous catheter insertion; use of a 2% chlorhexidine preparation for skin antisepsis; no routine replacement of central venous catheters for prevention of infection; and use of antiseptic/antibiotic impregnated short-term central venous catheters if the rate of infection is high despite adherence to other strategies (i.e. education and training, maximal sterile barrier precautions and 2% chlorhexidine for skin antisepsis). Successful implementation of these evidence-based interventions can reduce the risk for serious catheter-related infection.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Attributable cost of catheter-associated bloodstream infections among intensive care patients in a nonteaching hospital.

            To determine the attributable cost and length of stay of intensive care unit (ICU)-acquired, catheter-associated bloodstream infections from a hospital-based cost perspective, after adjusting for potential confounders. Patients admitted to the ICU between January 19, 1998, and July 31, 2000, were observed prospectively for the occurrence of catheter-associated bloodstream infections. Hospital costs were obtained from the hospital cost accounting database. The medical and surgical ICUs at a 500-bed suburban, tertiary care hospital. Patients requiring central venous catheterization while in the ICU. None. We measured occurrence of catheter-associated bloodstream infection, in-hospital mortality rate, total ICU and hospital lengths of stay, and total hospital costs. Catheter-associated bloodstream infection occurred in 41 of 1,132 patients (3.6 cases per 1000 catheter days). Patients with catheter-associated bloodstream infection had significantly higher unadjusted ICU length of stay (median, 24 vs. 5 days; p < .001), hospital length of stay (median, 45 vs. 11 days; p < .001), mortality rate (21 [51%] vs. 301 [28%], p = .001), and total hospital costs (83,544 dollars vs. 23,803 dollars, p < .001). Controlling for other factors that may affect costs and lengths of stay, catheter-associated bloodstream infections resulted in an attributable cost of 11,971 dollars (95% confidence interval, 6,732 dollars-18,352 dollars), ICU length of stay of 2.41 days (95% confidence interval, 0.08-3.09 days), and hospital length of stay of 7.54 days (95% confidence interval, 3.99-11.09 days). Patients with catheter-associated bloodstream infection had significantly longer ICU and hospital lengths of stay, with higher unadjusted total mortality rate and hospital cost compared with uninfected patients. After adjusting for underlying severity of illness, the attributable cost of catheter-associated bloodstream infection was approximately 11,971 dollars.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Overview of catheter-related infections with special emphasis on prevention based on educational programs.

              Intra-vascular access is an unavoidable tool in sophisticated modern medical practice, and catheter-related infection remains a leading cause of nosocomial infections, particularly in intensive care units where it is associated with significant patient morbidity, mortality, and additional hospital costs. The incidence of catheter-related bloodstream infection ranges from 2 to 14 episodes per 1000 catheter-days. On average, microbiologically documented, device-related bloodstream infections complicate the use of a central venous line in three to five per 100 cases. But this represents only the visible part of the iceberg and most episodes of clinical sepsis are nowadays considered to be catheter-related. We briefly review the pathophysiology of these infections, highlighting the importance of the skin insertion site and the intravenous line hub as principal sources of colonization and infection. Principles of therapy are briefly addressed. A large proportion of these infections are preventable and this has been the objective of creating precise guidelines. It was recently suggested that the situation may evolve with the introduction of antibiotic/antiseptic-coated devices, whose impact on the epidemiology of antibiotic resistance remains to be determined. Recently, educational programs and/or a global preventive strategy based on the strict application of specific preventive measures and careful control of all factors associated with infection proved to be even more effective than coated devices in reducing rates of infection. Practical aspects regarding educational approaches will help clinicians to adapt and incorporate educational programs into clinical practice.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Patient Saf Surg
                Patient Safety in Surgery
                BioMed Central
                1754-9493
                2008
                30 April 2008
                : 2
                : 11
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Anesthesiology, University of Toledo College of Medicine, 3000 Arlington Avenue, Toledo, USA
                [2 ]Infection Control Department, University of Toledo College of Medicine, 3000 Arlington Avenue, Toledo, USA
                [3 ]Department of Medicine, University of Toledo College of Medicine, 3000 Arlington Avenue, Toledo, USA
                [4 ]Department of Surgery, University of Toledo College of Medicine, 3000 Arlington Avenue, Toledo, USA
                Article
                1754-9493-2-11
                10.1186/1754-9493-2-11
                2386777
                18447937
                7a1c48e7-4d2b-45b2-babe-a6f00e3d97d5
                Copyright © 2008 Papadimos et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 30 January 2008
                : 30 April 2008
                Categories
                Short Report

                Surgery
                Surgery

                Comments

                Comment on this article