Improvement of Outcomes During the First Two Years Following Total Ankle Arthroplasty :

Total ankle arthroplasty provides an alternative to arthrodesis for management of ankle arthritis. What is the outcome of total ankle arthroplasty implants currently in use? We conducted a systematic literature search of studies reporting on the outcome of total ankle arthroplasty. We included peer-reviewed studies reporting on at least 20 total ankle arthroplasties with currently used implants, with a minimum followup of 2 years. The Coleman Methodology Score was used to evaluate the quality of the studies. Thirteen Level IV studies of overall good quality reporting on 1105 total ankle arthroplasties (234 Agility, 344 STAR, 153 Buechel-Pappas, 152 HINTEGRA, 98 Salto, 70 TNK, 54 Mobility) were included. Residual pain was common (range, 27%-60%), superficial wound complications occurred in 0% to 14.7%, deep infections occurred in 0% to 4.6% of ankles, and ankle function improved after total ankle arthroplasty. The overall failure rate was approximately 10% at 5 years with a wide range (range, 0%-32%) between different centers. Superiority of an implant design over another cannot be supported by the available data. Level IV, therapeutic study. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Little information is available about gait changes in ankle osteoarthritis and total ankle replacement, and also about total ankle replacement patients' rehabilitation in the first year after surgery.

The improving survivorship of ankle replacements is making this an increasingly popular option in the treatment of ankle arthritis, rather than the established option of ankle fusion. The potential benefits of restoring movement, improving gait and protecting adjacent joints are persuasive arguments in favor of replacing rather than fusing the ankle joint. Gait analysis was performed before and after ankle arthroplasty on 12 patients, and compared to 12 patients with a successful ankle arthrodesis and to a healthy control group of 12 people. Important differences between the arthrodesis and ankle replacement groups were demonstrated although neither restored normal movement or walking speed. Ankle arthrodesis resulted in a faster gait with a longer step length compared to replacement, although the timing of gait demonstrated greater asymmetry. The ankle replacement group had greater movement at the ankle, a symmetrical timing of gait and restored ground reaction force pattern. The improved timing of gait would support the observation of a reduction in limp with ankle replacement though the gait is significantly slower. Longer term results are necessary to determine whether the improved movement and force transmission persists with time and protects adjacent articulations.