8
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Neuropsychological and biopsychosocial evolution, therapeutic adherence and unmet care needs during paediatric transplantation: study protocol of a mixed-methods design (observational cohort study and focus groups) – the TransplantKIDS mental health project

      methods-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The present article describes the protocol of a mixed-methods study (an observational cohort design and focus groups), aimed to examine neuropsychological functioning and other biopsychosocial outcomes, therapeutic adherence and unmet care needs in paediatric population undergoing solid organ or allogeneic hematopoietic transplant during the pre- and post-transplant phases. Following a multi-method/multi-source approach, neuropsychological domains will be comprehensively measured with objective tests (SDMT, K-CPT 2/CPT 3, TAVECI/TAVEC, WISC-V/WAIS-IV Vocabulary and Digit Span subtests, Verbal Fluency tests, Stroop, ROCF, and TONI-4); ecological executive functioning, affective and behavioral domains, pain intensity/interference, sleep quality and therapeutic adherence will be assessed through questionnaires (parent/legal guardians-reported: BRIEF-2 and BASC-3; and self-reported: BASC-3, BPI, PROMIS, AIQ and SMAQ); and blood levels of prescribed drugs will be taken from each patient’s medical history. These outcomes will be measured at pre-transplant and at 4-weeks and 6-months post-transplant phases. The estimated sample size was 60 patients (any type of transplant, solid organ, or hematopoietic) from La Paz University Hospital (Madrid, Spain). Finally, three focus group sessions will be organized with patients, parents/guardians, and transplant clinicians ( n = 15, with 5 participants per group), in order to qualitatively identify unmet care needs during the pre-, and post-transplant stages of the process. The study protocol was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05441436).

          Related collections

          Most cited references56

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Research electronic data capture (REDCap)--a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support.

          Research electronic data capture (REDCap) is a novel workflow methodology and software solution designed for rapid development and deployment of electronic data capture tools to support clinical and translational research. We present: (1) a brief description of the REDCap metadata-driven software toolset; (2) detail concerning the capture and use of study-related metadata from scientific research teams; (3) measures of impact for REDCap; (4) details concerning a consortium network of domestic and international institutions collaborating on the project; and (5) strengths and limitations of the REDCap system. REDCap is currently supporting 286 translational research projects in a growing collaborative network including 27 active partner institutions.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups.

            Qualitative research explores complex phenomena encountered by clinicians, health care providers, policy makers and consumers. Although partial checklists are available, no consolidated reporting framework exists for any type of qualitative design. To develop a checklist for explicit and comprehensive reporting of qualitative studies (in depth interviews and focus groups). We performed a comprehensive search in Cochrane and Campbell Protocols, Medline, CINAHL, systematic reviews of qualitative studies, author or reviewer guidelines of major medical journals and reference lists of relevant publications for existing checklists used to assess qualitative studies. Seventy-six items from 22 checklists were compiled into a comprehensive list. All items were grouped into three domains: (i) research team and reflexivity, (ii) study design and (iii) data analysis and reporting. Duplicate items and those that were ambiguous, too broadly defined and impractical to assess were removed. Items most frequently included in the checklists related to sampling method, setting for data collection, method of data collection, respondent validation of findings, method of recording data, description of the derivation of themes and inclusion of supporting quotations. We grouped all items into three domains: (i) research team and reflexivity, (ii) study design and (iii) data analysis and reporting. The criteria included in COREQ, a 32-item checklist, can help researchers to report important aspects of the research team, study methods, context of the study, findings, analysis and interpretations.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              A power primer.

              One possible reason for the continued neglect of statistical power analysis in research in the behavioral sciences is the inaccessibility of or difficulty with the standard material. A convenient, although not comprehensive, presentation of required sample sizes is provided here. Effect-size indexes and conventional values for these are given for operationally defined small, medium, and large effects. The sample sizes necessary for .80 power to detect effects at these levels are tabled for eight standard statistical tests: (a) the difference between independent means, (b) the significance of a product-moment correlation, (c) the difference between independent rs, (d) the sign test, (e) the difference between independent proportions, (f) chi-square tests for goodness of fit and contingency tables, (g) one-way analysis of variance, and (h) the significance of a multiple or multiple partial correlation.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                URI : https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/2609862/overviewRole: Role: Role: Role: Role: Role: Role: Role:
                Role: Role: Role: Role: Role: Role:
                URI : https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/628973/overviewRole: Role: Role: Role: Role: Role: Role:
                URI : https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/954064/overviewRole: Role: Role: Role: Role:
                URI : https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/75436/overviewRole: Role: Role: Role: Role: Role: Role:
                Role: Role: Role: Role: Role: Role:
                URI : https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1463992/overviewRole: Role: Role: Role: Role: Role: Role: Role: Role: Role: Role: Role:
                Journal
                Front Psychol
                Front Psychol
                Front. Psychol.
                Frontiers in Psychology
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                1664-1078
                21 February 2024
                2024
                : 15
                : 1308418
                Affiliations
                [1] 1Department of Psychiatry, Clinical Psychology and Mental Health, La Paz University Hospital , Madrid, Spain
                [2] 2Department of Personality, Evaluation and Psychological Treatment, University of Málaga , Málaga, Spain
                [3] 3Instituto Biomédico de Málaga – IBIMA Plataforma Bionand , Málaga, Spain
                [4] 4Department of Pediatric Surgery, La Paz University Hospital , Madrid, Spain
                [5] 5Department of Pediatric Hemato-Oncology, La Paz University Hospital , Madrid, Spain
                [6] 6Hospital La Paz Institute for Health Research (IdiPAZ) , Madrid, Spain
                [7] 7Department of Pediatrics, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid (UAM) , Madrid, Spain
                [8] 8Department of Psychiatry, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid (UAM) , Madrid, Spain
                [9] 9Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Salud Mental (CIBERSAM), Instituto de Salud Carlos III , Madrid, Spain
                [10] 10Faculty of Social Sciences and Communication, Universidad Europea de Madrid , Madrid, Spain
                Author notes

                Edited by: Sabrina Bonichini, University of Padua, Italy

                Reviewed by: Purificación Sierra-García, National University of Distance Education (UNED), Spain

                Emilio Verche, Complutense University of Madrid, Spain

                *Correspondence: Eduardo Fernández-Jiménez, e.fernandez.jimenez@ 123456facultyue.es
                Article
                10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1308418
                10915199
                38449767
                7a50d1bc-80cb-4622-bde6-32dae5653f46
                Copyright © 2024 Garrido-Bolton, Alcamí-Pertejo, de la Vega, Hernández-Oliveros, Pérez-Martínez, Bravo-Ortiz and Fernández-Jiménez.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 06 October 2023
                : 11 January 2024
                Page count
                Figures: 1, Tables: 1, Equations: 0, References: 57, Pages: 10, Words: 7855
                Funding
                The author(s) declare financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. This research was funded by the Fundación Alicia Koplowitz, Grants for Research Projects in Psychiatry, Psychology and Child-Adolescent Neurosciences, year 2022. RV’s work was supported by the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation with a Ramon y Cajal contract (RYC2018-024722-I). Also, this research was funded in part by Foundation for Biomedical Research of La Paz University Hospital (FIBHULP), Becas Dr. Luis Álvarez 2022.
                Categories
                Psychology
                Study Protocol
                Custom metadata
                Pediatric Psychology

                Clinical Psychology & Psychiatry
                neuropsychological outcomes,biopsychosocial model,organ transplantation,allogeneic hematopoietic transplantation,children/adolescents,observational cohort design,focus groups

                Comments

                Comment on this article