9
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Association of Criminal Statutes for Opioid Use Disorder With Prevalence and Treatment Among Pregnant Women With Commercial Insurance in the United States

      research-article
      , MS 1 , , MPH, BDS 1 , , PhD, MPH 1 ,
      JAMA Network Open
      American Medical Association

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Key Points

          Question

          Do the prevalence of opioid use disorder and the use of medication-assisted treatment among commercially insured pregnant women vary according to region and state legislature?

          Findings

          In this cohort study of 110 285 pregnant women, statistically significant regional variations in opioid use disorder diagnosis and receipt of treatment were observed. Variations by state legislature were observed in opioid use disorder diagnoses but not in receipt of treatment.

          Meaning

          These findings appear to indicate a discrepancy in the diagnosis and treatment of opioid use disorder on both a regional and legal basis.

          Abstract

          Importance

          Inadequate treatment of opioid use disorder (OUD) in pregnant women increases the risk of life-threatening consequences on maternal and fetal outcomes. Untreated OUD during pregnancy is associated with higher rates of adverse outcomes among newborns.

          Objective

          To examine the variation in the prevalence of OUD and the use of medication-assisted treatment among commercially insured pregnant women according to region and state legislature.

          Design, Setting, and Participants

          Cohort study in which the patient cohort used was derived from a 10% random sample of enrollees within the IQVIA PharMetrics Plus adjudicated claims and enrollment database from 2007 to 2015. The database consists of a 10% random sample of private health insurance recipients in the United States and contains claims and enrollment data that are representative of the commercially insured US population. The cohort comprised women (n = 110 285) between 18 and 45 years of age with a code indicating a delivery and continuous insurance enrollment 9 months before and 12 months after delivery. Data analysis was performed from December 2017 to May 2018.

          Exposures

          Based on their state of residence, the women were classified into 4 different regions: South, Midwest, West, and Northeast. Those residing in states with statutes that imposed civil or criminal penalties for OUD diagnosis during pregnancy were placed in a separate population from those residing in states without these statutes.

          Main Outcomes and Measures

          Diagnosis of OUD in the 9 months before delivery and the receipt of medication-assisted treatment in the 9 months before or 12 months after delivery.

          Results

          The 110 285 pregnant women included in the analysis had a mean (SD) age of 30.26 (5.59) years, with most (67 771 [61.5%]) falling within the 26- to 35-year age range. Of this cohort, 277 women (0.25%) had a diagnosis of OUD and 312 (0.28%) received treatment. Among the 277 women with OUD, 127 (45.9%) received treatment. The prevalence of an OUD diagnosis and receipt of treatment within regions was statistically significant (OUD diagnosis by region: Midwest, 0.05%; North, 0.09%; South, 0.06%; West, 0.06%; χ 2 3 = 45.1148 [ P < .001]; OUD treatment by region: Midwest, 0.05%; North, 0.08%; South, 0.10%; West, 0.05%; χ 2 3 = 26.5654 [ P < .001]). The prevalence of OUD diagnosis was also statistically significant when comparing women residing in states with statutes with those in states without statutes (OUD diagnosis by criminal statutes: criminalization, 0.07%; no criminalization, 0.18%; χ 2 1 = 14.6456 [ P < .001]; OUD treatment by criminal statutes: criminalization, 0.12%; no criminalization, 0.17%; χ 2 1 = 0.0895); the receipt of treatment was not statistically significant ( P = .76).

          Conclusions and Relevance

          These results appeared to show significant variations in the patterns of OUD diagnosis and receipt of medication-assisted treatment among pregnant women, suggesting the need to further explore the source of these variations.

          Abstract

          This cohort study examines data from the IQVIA PharMetrics Plus database for prevalence of opioid use disorder and treatment among a random sample of privately insured pregnant women in 4 regions across the United States.

          Related collections

          Most cited references23

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Neonatal abstinence syndrome and associated health care expenditures: United States, 2000-2009.

          Neonatal abstinence syndrome (NAS) is a postnatal drug withdrawal syndrome primarily caused by maternal opiate use. No national estimates are available for the incidence of maternal opiate use at the time of delivery or NAS. To determine the national incidence of NAS and antepartum maternal opiate use and to characterize trends in national health care expenditures associated with NAS between 2000 and 2009. A retrospective, serial, cross-sectional analysis of a nationally representative sample of newborns with NAS. The Kids' Inpatient Database (KID) was used to identify newborns with NAS by International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) code. The Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) was used to identify mothers using diagnosis related groups for vaginal and cesarean deliveries. Clinical conditions were identified using ICD-9-CM diagnosis codes. NAS and maternal opiate use were described as an annual frequency per 1000 hospital births. Missing hospital charges (<5% of cases) were estimated using multiple imputation. Trends in health care utilization outcomes over time were evaluated using variance-weighted regression. All hospital charges were adjusted for inflation to 2009 US dollars. Incidence of NAS and maternal opiate use, and related hospital charges. The separate years (2000, 2003, 2006, and 2009) of national discharge data included 2920 to 9674 unweighted discharges with NAS and 987 to 4563 unweighted discharges for mothers diagnosed with antepartum opiate use, within data sets including 784,191 to 1.1 million discharges for children (KID) and 816,554 to 879,910 discharges for all ages of delivering mothers (NIS). Between 2000 and 2009, the incidence of NAS among newborns increased from 1.20 (95% CI, 1.04-1.37) to 3.39 (95% CI, 3.12-3.67) per 1000 hospital births per year (P for trend < .001). Antepartum maternal opiate use also increased from 1.19 (95% CI, 1.01-1.35) to 5.63 (95% CI, 4.40-6.71) per 1000 hospital births per year (P for trend < .001). In 2009, newborns with NAS were more likely than all other hospital births to have low birthweight (19.1%; SE, 0.5%; vs 7.0%; SE, 0.2%), have respiratory complications (30.9%; SE, 0.7%; vs 8.9%; SE, 0.1%), and be covered by Medicaid (78.1%; SE, 0.8%; vs 45.5%; SE, 0.7%; all P < .001). Mean hospital charges for discharges with NAS increased from $39,400 (95% CI, $33,400-$45,400) in 2000 to $53,400 (95% CI, $49,000-$57,700) in 2009 (P for trend < .001). By 2009, 77.6% of charges for NAS were attributed to state Medicaid programs. Between 2000 and 2009, a substantial increase in the incidence of NAS and maternal opiate use in the United States was observed, as well as hospital charges related to NAS.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            Pregnant women and substance use: fear, stigma, and barriers to care

            Background Substance use during pregnancy and motherhood is both a public health and criminal justice concern. Negative health consequences associated with substance use impact both the mother and the developing fetus, and there are ongoing attempts to criminalize substance use during pregnancy that put pregnant substance-using women at risk of detection, arrest, and punishment. This study explored the experiences of substance-using mothers as they navigated health and criminal justice consequences and accessed needed resources in the community. Methods In-depth life history interviews were conducted with 30 recently-pregnant women who had used alcohol or other drugs during their pregnancies. The three-part interview schedule included questions about past and current substance use, life history, and experiences with criminal justice authorities, child protective services, and health professionals. Results Women’s stories highlighted their strategies for managing their risk of detection by health or criminal justice authorities, including isolating themselves from others, skipping treatment appointments, or avoiding treatment altogether. Women described multiple barriers to treatment and healthcare, including a lack of suitable treatment options and difficulty finding and enrolling in treatment. Conclusion The findings suggest that policies that substance-using women find threatening discourage them from seeking comprehensive medical treatment during their pregnancies. The implications of the findings are discussed, particularly the need for further expansion of treatment programs and social services to meet the needs of substance-using women.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Opioid abuse and dependence during pregnancy: temporal trends and obstetrical outcomes.

              The authors investigated nationwide trends in opioid abuse or dependence during pregnancy and assessed the impact on maternal and obstetrical outcomes in the United States.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                JAMA Netw Open
                JAMA Netw Open
                JAMA Netw Open
                JAMA Network Open
                American Medical Association
                2574-3805
                8 March 2019
                March 2019
                8 March 2019
                : 2
                : 3
                : e190338
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Pharmaceutical Health Services Research, University of Maryland School of Pharmacy, Baltimore
                Author notes
                Article Information
                Accepted for Publication: January 17, 2019.
                Published: March 8, 2019. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.0338
                Open Access: This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY License. © 2019 Gressler LE et al. JAMA Network Open.
                Corresponding Author: Fadia T. Shaya, PhD, MPH, Pharmaceutical Health Services Research, University of Maryland School of Pharmacy, 220 Arch St, 12th Floor, Room 01-204, Baltimore, MD 21201 ( fshaya@ 123456rx.umaryland.edu ).
                Author Contributions: Ms Gressler and Dr Shaya had full access to all of the data in the study and take responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.
                Concept and design: All authors.
                Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data: All authors.
                Drafting of the manuscript: All authors.
                Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: Shaya.
                Statistical analysis: All authors.
                Administrative, technical, or material support: Shaya.
                Supervision: Shaya.
                Revisions: Shaya.
                Conflict of Interest Disclosures: None reported.
                Disclaimer: The statements, findings, conclusions, views, and opinions contained and expressed in this article are based in part on data obtained under license from IQVIA. Source: IQVIA PharMetrics Plus, January 2007-December 2015, IQVIA. All rights reserved. The statements, findings, conclusions, views, and opinions contained and expressed herein are not necessarily those of IQVIA or any of its affiliated or subsidiary entities.
                Article
                zoi190027
                10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.0338
                6484651
                30848807
                7a555cd8-d6c5-4233-99e9-882a966689d2
                Copyright 2019 Gressler LE et al. JAMA Network Open.

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY License.

                History
                : 9 October 2018
                : 16 January 2019
                : 17 January 2019
                Categories
                Research
                Original Investigation
                Online Only
                Substance Use and Addiction

                Comments

                Comment on this article