7
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      CoMPARA: Collaborative Modeling Project for Androgen Receptor Activity

      research-article
      1 , 2 , 3 , , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 7 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 12 , 8 , 18 , 19 , 15 , 12 , 1 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 22 , 23 , 10 , 17 , 10 , 14 , * , 6 , ** , 19 , 21 , 24 , 8 , 22 , 6 , 13 , 16 , 15 , 25 , 19 , 26 , 26 , 17 , 1 , 14 , 27 , 24 , 28 , 20 , 15 , 5 , 20 , 1 , 19 , 29 , 25 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 12 , 20 , 6 , 8 , 18 , 21 , 17 , 13 ,   1 , 17 , 22 , 9 , 1 ,
      Environmental Health Perspectives
      Environmental Health Perspectives
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background:

          Endocrine disrupting chemicals (EDCs) are xenobiotics that mimic the interaction of natural hormones and alter synthesis, transport, or metabolic pathways. The prospect of EDCs causing adverse health effects in humans and wildlife has led to the development of scientific and regulatory approaches for evaluating bioactivity. This need is being addressed using high-throughput screening (HTS) in vitro approaches and computational modeling.

          Objectives:

          In support of the Endocrine Disruptor Screening Program, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) led two worldwide consortiums to virtually screen chemicals for their potential estrogenic and androgenic activities. Here, we describe the Collaborative Modeling Project for Androgen Receptor Activity (CoMPARA) efforts, which follows the steps of the Collaborative Estrogen Receptor Activity Prediction Project (CERAPP).

          Methods:

          The CoMPARA list of screened chemicals built on CERAPP’s list of 32,464 chemicals to include additional chemicals of interest, as well as simulated ToxCast™ metabolites, totaling 55,450 chemical structures. Computational toxicology scientists from 25 international groups contributed 91 predictive models for binding, agonist, and antagonist activity predictions. Models were underpinned by a common training set of 1,746 chemicals compiled from a combined data set of 11 ToxCast™/Tox21 HTS in vitro assays.

          Results:

          The resulting models were evaluated using curated literature data extracted from different sources. To overcome the limitations of single-model approaches, CoMPARA predictions were combined into consensus models that provided averaged predictive accuracy of approximately 80% for the evaluation set.

          Discussion:

          The strengths and limitations of the consensus predictions were discussed with example chemicals; then, the models were implemented into the free and open-source OPERA application to enable screening of new chemicals with a defined applicability domain and accuracy assessment. This implementation was used to screen the entire EPA DSSTox database of 875,000 chemicals, and their predicted AR activities have been made available on the EPA CompTox Chemicals dashboard and National Toxicology Program’s Integrated Chemical Environment. https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP5580

          Related collections

          Most cited references67

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          A Statistical View of Some Chemometrics Regression Tools

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Trust, but verify: on the importance of chemical structure curation in cheminformatics and QSAR modeling research.

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              ToxCast Chemical Landscape: Paving the Road to 21st Century Toxicology

              The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) ToxCast program is testing a large library of Agency-relevant chemicals using in vitro high-throughput screening (HTS) approaches to support the development of improved toxicity prediction models. Launched in 2007, Phase I of the program screened 310 chemicals, mostly pesticides, across hundreds of ToxCast assay end points. In Phase II, the ToxCast library was expanded to 1878 chemicals, culminating in the public release of screening data at the end of 2013. Subsequent expansion in Phase III has resulted in more than 3800 chemicals actively undergoing ToxCast screening, 96% of which are also being screened in the multi-Agency Tox21 project. The chemical library unpinning these efforts plays a central role in defining the scope and potential application of ToxCast HTS results. The history of the phased construction of EPA's ToxCast library is reviewed, followed by a survey of the library contents from several different vantage points. CAS Registry Numbers are used to assess ToxCast library coverage of important toxicity, regulatory, and exposure inventories. Structure-based representations of ToxCast chemicals are then used to compute physicochemical properties, substructural features, and structural alerts for toxicity and biotransformation. Cheminformatics approaches using these varied representations are applied to defining the boundaries of HTS testability, evaluating chemical diversity, and comparing the ToxCast library to potential target application inventories, such as used in EPA's Endocrine Disruption Screening Program (EDSP). Through several examples, the ToxCast chemical library is demonstrated to provide comprehensive coverage of the knowledge domains and target inventories of potential interest to EPA. Furthermore, the varied representations and approaches presented here define local chemistry domains potentially worthy of further investigation (e.g., not currently covered in the testing library or defined by toxicity "alerts") to strategically support data mining and predictive toxicology modeling moving forward.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Environ Health Perspect
                Environ. Health Perspect
                EHP
                Environmental Health Perspectives
                Environmental Health Perspectives
                0091-6765
                1552-9924
                7 February 2020
                February 2020
                : 128
                : 2
                : 027002
                Affiliations
                [1 ]National Center for Computational Toxicology, Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA) , Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA
                [2 ]ScitoVation LLC , Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA
                [3 ]Integrated Laboratory Systems, Inc ., Morrisville, North Carolina, USA
                [4 ]National Toxicology Program Interagency Center for the Evaluation of Alternative Toxicological Methods (NICEATM) , National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA
                [5 ]Technische Universität München, Wissenschaftszentrum Weihenstephan für Ernährung, Landnutzung und Umwelt, Department für Biowissenschaftliche Grundlagen, Weihenstephaner Steig 23, 85350 Freising, Germany
                [6 ]Department of Pharmacy-Drug Sciences, University of Bari , Bari, Italy
                [7 ]Laboratory for Molecular Modeling and Drug Design, Faculty of Pharmacy, Federal University of Goiás , Goiânia, Brazil
                [8 ]Laboratory for Molecular Modeling, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill , Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
                [9 ]Chemistry Department, Umeå University , Umeå, Sweden
                [10 ]School of Pharmacy, Lanzhou University , China
                [11 ]Information Systems & Global Solutions (IS&GS), Lockheed Martin , USA
                [12 ]Milano Chemometrics and QSAR Research Group, Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Milano-Bicocca , Milan, Italy
                [13 ]Division of Risk Assessment and Nutrition, National Food Institute, Technical University of Denmark , Copenhagen, Denmark
                [14 ]Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche “Mario Negri”, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
                [15 ]QSAR Research Unit in Environmental Chemistry and Ecotoxicology, Department of Theoretical and Applied Sciences, University of Insubria , Varese, Italy
                [16 ]Swedish Toxicology Sciences Research Center, Karolinska Institutet , Södertälje, Sweden
                [17 ]School of Environmental Science and Technology, Dalian University of Technology , Dalian, China
                [18 ]Department of Chemistry, Bioinformatics Research Center, North Carolina State University , Raleigh, North Carolina, USA
                [19 ]Institute of Chemistry, University of Tartu , Tartu, Estonia
                [20 ]Division of Bioinformatics and Biostatistics, National Center for Toxicology Research, U.S. Food and Drug Administration , Jefferson, Arkansas, USA
                [21 ]Laboratoire de Chémoinformatique—UMR7140, University of Strasbourg/CNRS , Strasbourg, France
                [22 ]National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, National Institutes of Health , Rockville, Maryland, USA
                [23 ]IdeaConsult, Ltd. , Sofia, Bulgaria
                [24 ]National Risk Management Research Laboratory, U.S. EPA , Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
                [25 ]Computational Modeling of Protein-Ligand Interactions (CMPLI)–INSERM UMR 8251, INSERM ERL U1133, Functional and Adaptative Biology (BFA), Universite de Paris , Paris, France
                [26 ]Institute of Biomedical Chemistry IBMC, 10 Building 8, Pogodinskaya st., Moscow 119121, Russia
                [27 ]Computational Toxicology and Methods Development Laboratory, Division of Toxicology and Human Health Sciences, Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention , Atlanta, Georgia, USA
                [28 ]Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biophysics, University of Chicago , Chicago, Illinois, USA
                [29 ]Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Pharmacy, East China University of Science and Technology , Shanghai, China
                [30 ]BIGCHEM GmbH , Neuherberg, Germany
                [31 ]Helmholtz Zentrum Muenchen – German Research Center for Environmental Health (GmbH) , Neuherberg, Germany
                Author notes
                Address correspondence to Richard Judson, 109 T.W. Alexander Dr., Research Triangle Park, NC, 27711 USA. Telephone: (919) 541-3085. Email: judson.richard@ 123456epa.gov or Kamel Mansouri, 601 Keystone Dr., Morrisville, NC 27650, USA. Telephone: (919) 281-1110 ext. 240. Email: kamel.mansouri@ 123456nih.gov
                Article
                EHP5580
                10.1289/EHP5580
                7064318
                32074470
                7a6ecc83-baba-49fc-afab-79c1c69aec55

                EHP is an open-access journal published with support from the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, National Institutes of Health. All content is public domain unless otherwise noted.

                History
                : 06 May 2019
                : 27 November 2019
                : 05 December 2019
                Categories
                Research

                Public health
                Public health

                Comments

                Comment on this article