14
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Prognostic indicators for failed nonsurgical reduction of intussusception

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Purpose

          To identify the risk factors for failure of nonsurgical reduction of intussusception.

          Methods

          Data from intussusception patients who were treated with nonsurgical reduction in Chiang Mai University Hospital and Siriraj Hospital between January 2006 and December 2012 were collected. Patients aged 0–15 years and without contraindications (peritonitis, abdominal X-ray signs of perforation, and/or hemodynamic instability) were included for nonsurgical reduction. The success and failure groups were divided according to the results of the reduction. Prognostic indicators for failed reduction were identified by using generalized linear model for exponential risk regression. The risk ratio (RR) was used to report each factor.

          Results

          One hundred and ninety cases of intussusception were enrolled. Twenty cases were excluded due to contraindications. A total of 170 cases of intussusception were included for the final analysis. The significant risk factors for reduction failure clustered by an age of 3 years were weight <12 kg (RR =1.48, P=0.004), symptom duration >3 days (RR =1.26, P<0.001), vomiting (RR =1.63, P<0.001), rectal bleeding (RR =1.50, P<0.001), abdominal distension (RR =1.60, P=0.003), temperature >37.8°C (RR =1.51, P<0.001), palpable abdominal mass (RR =1.26, P<0.001), location of mass (left over right side) (RR =1.48, P<0.001), poor prognostic signs on ultrasound scans (RR =1.35, P<0.001), and method of reduction (hydrostatic over pneumatic) (RR =1.34, P=0.023). The prediction ability of this model was 82.21% as assessed from the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve.

          Conclusion

          The identified prognostic factors for the nonsurgical reduction failure may help to predict the reduction outcome and provide information to the parents.

          Most cited references23

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Acute intussusception in infants and children as an adverse event following immunization: case definition and guidelines of data collection, analysis, and presentation.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Risk factors for surgery in pediatric intussusception in the era of pneumatic reduction.

            Surgical treatment is still necessary for intussusception management in a subgroup of patients, despite advances in enema reduction techniques. Early identification of these patients should improve outcomes.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Recurrence rates after intussusception enema reduction: a meta-analysis.

              Reported rates of recurrence after enema reduction for intussusception are variable. Concerns for recurrence influence postreduction management. The objective of this study was to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to estimate overall, 24-hour, and 48-hour recurrence rates after enema reduction in children.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Ther Clin Risk Manag
                Ther Clin Risk Manag
                Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management
                Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management
                Dove Medical Press
                1176-6336
                1178-203X
                2016
                09 August 2016
                : 12
                : 1231-1237
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Division of Pediatric Surgery, Department of Surgery
                [2 ]Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Pediatrics, Chiang Mai University Hospital, Chiang Mai
                [3 ]Division of Pediatric Surgery, Department of Surgery, Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok
                [4 ]Center of Excellence in Applied Epidemiology, Thammasat University Hospital, Pathumthani, Thailand
                Author notes
                Correspondence: Jesda Singhavejsakul, Division of Pediatric Surgery, Department, of Surgery, Chiang Mai University, Hospital, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand, Tel +66 8 1992 9767, Fax +66 53 93 6139, Email pedsurgerycmu@ 123456gmail.com
                Article
                tcrm-12-1231
                10.2147/TCRM.S109785
                4984823
                27563245
                7a7845f8-74a5-4c2d-b390-8e5b98217c0c
                © 2016 Khorana et al. This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited

                The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed.

                History
                Categories
                Original Research

                Medicine
                intussusception,pneumatic reduction,hydrostatic reduction,prognostic indicators,failure rate

                Comments

                Comment on this article