ScienceOpen:
research and publishing network
For Publishers
Discovery
Metadata
Peer review
Hosting
Publishing
For Researchers
Join
Publish
Review
Collect
My ScienceOpen
Sign in
Register
Dashboard
Blog
About
Search
Advanced search
My ScienceOpen
Sign in
Register
Dashboard
Search
Search
Advanced search
For Publishers
Discovery
Metadata
Peer review
Hosting
Publishing
For Researchers
Join
Publish
Review
Collect
Blog
About
3
views
0
references
Top references
cited by
3
0 reviews
Review
0
comments
Comment
0
recommends
+1
Recommend
0
collections
Add to
0
shares
Share
Twitter
Sina Weibo
Facebook
Email
725
similar
All similar
Record
: found
Abstract
: not found
Article
: not found
Comment to: Do they agree? Bibliometric evaluation versus informed peer review in the Italian research assessment exercise
Author(s):
Graziella Bertocchi
,
Alfonso Gambardella
,
Tullio Jappelli
,
Carmela Anna Nappi
,
Franco Peracchi
,
G Bertocchi
,
A. Gambardella
,
T. JAPPELLI
,
CA Nappi
,
F Peracchi
,
Graziella BERTOCCHI
Publication date:
2016
Journal:
Scientometrics
Read this article at
ScienceOpen
Publisher
Further versions
oa repository (via OAI-PMH doi match)
Powered by
Bookmark
There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.
Related collections
Italian Studies
Author and article information
Journal
DOI::
10.1007/s11192-016-1965-7
Data availability:
Comments
Comment on this article
Sign in to comment
scite_
Similar content
725
V.H.6 Certain Recommendations of Third Antarctic Treaty Consultative Meeting, Annex: Agreed Measures for the Conservation of Antarctic Fauna and Flora (13 Jun 64). See Basic Document V.D.2, supra
Authors:
European clinical practice guidelines on the use of chemotherapy for advanced oesophageal and gastric cancers: a critical review using the AGREE II and the AGREE-REX instruments.
Authors:
Marilina Santero
,
Adriana Gabriela Meade
,
Roberto Acosta-Dighero
…
Understanding misunderstandings in invasion science: why experts don’t agree on common concepts and risk assessments
Authors:
Franziska Humair
,
Peter J. Edwards
,
Michael Siegrist
…
See all similar
Cited by
3
Reply to the comment of Bertocchi et al.
Authors:
Alberto Baccini
,
Giuseppe De Nicolao
Have you Read This? An Empirical Comparison of the British REF Peer Review and the Italian VQR Bibliometric Algorithm
Authors:
Daniele Checchi
,
Alberto Ciolfi
,
Gianni De Fraja
…
On the agreement between bibliometrics and peer review: Evidence from the Italian research assessment exercises
Authors:
Alberto Baccini
,
Lucio Barabesi
,
Giuseppe De Nicolao
See all cited by