12
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      The contribution of cattle urine and dung to nitrous oxide emissions: Quantification of country specific emission factors and implications for national inventories

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Urine patches and dung pats from grazing livestock create hotspots for production and emission of the greenhouse gas, nitrous oxide (N 2O), and represent a large proportion of total N 2O emissions in many national agricultural greenhouse gas inventories. As such, there is much interest in developing country specific N 2O emission factors (EFs) for excretal nitrogen (EF 3, pasture, range and paddock) deposited during gazing. The aims of this study were to generate separate N 2O emissions data for cattle derived urine and dung, to provide an evidence base for the generation of a country specific EF for the UK from this nitrogen source. The experiments were also designed to determine the effects of site and timing of application on emissions, and the efficacy of the nitrification inhibitor, dicyandiamide (DCD) on N 2O losses. This co-ordinated set of 15 plot-scale, year-long field experiments using static chambers was conducted at five grassland sites, typical of the soil and climatic zones of grazed grassland in the UK. We show that the average urine and dung N 2O EFs were 0.69% and 0.19%, respectively, resulting in a combined excretal N 2O EF (EF 3), of 0.49%, which is <25% of the IPCC default EF 3 for excretal returns from grazing cattle. Regression analysis suggests that urine N 2O EFs were controlled more by composition than was the case for dung, whilst dung N 2O EFs were more related to soil and environmental factors. The urine N 2O EF was significantly greater from the site in SW England, and significantly greater from the early grazing season urine application than later applications. Dycandiamide reduced the N 2O EF from urine patches by an average of 46%. The significantly lower excretal EF 3 than the IPCC default has implications for the UK's national inventory and for subsequent carbon footprinting of UK ruminant livestock products.

          Graphical abstract

          Highlights

          • First co-ordinated experiments in UK to generate data for country specific grazing excretal N 2O EF

          • Urine had a significantly greater average N 2O EF (0.69%) than dung (0.19%).

          • The combined excretal N 2O EF was 0.49%, <25% of the IPCC default value for cattle.

          • DCD reduced the N 2O EF from urine patches by an average of 46%.

          • Urine N 2O was controlled by its composition, dung N 2O was related to soil and environmental factors.

          Related collections

          Most cited references47

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Effects of varying dietary protein and energy levels on the production of lactating dairy cows.

          Forty-five multiparous and 18 primiparous Holstein cows were fed three levels of crude protein (CP), each at three levels of neutral detergent fiber (NDF), to identify optimal dietary CP and energy. Cows were blocked by parity and days in milk into seven groups of nine and randomly assigned to an incomplete 9 x 9 Latin square trial with four, 4-wk periods. Diets were formulated from alfalfa and corn silages, high-moisture corn, soybean meal, minerals, and vitamins. Forage was 60% alfalfa and 40% corn silage on all diets; NDF contents of 36, 32, and 28% were obtained by feeding 75, 63, and 50% forage, respectively. Dietary CP contents of 15.1, 16.7, and 18.4% were obtained by replacing high-moisture corn with soybean meal. Production data were from the last 2 wk of each period. Spot fecal and urine samples were collected from 36 cows to estimate N excretion using fecal indigestible acid detergent fiber (ADF) and urinary creatinine as markers. There were no interactions (P > or = 0.08) between dietary CP and NDF for any trait; thus, effects of CP were not confounded by NDF or vice versa. Intake of DM and fat yield were lower on 15.1% CP than at higher CP. There were linear increases in milk urea and urinary N excretion and linear decreases in N efficiency with increasing CP. Increasing CP from 15.1 to 18.4% reduced milk N from 31 to 25% of dietary N, increased urinary N from 23 to 35% of dietary N, and reduced fecal N from 45 to 41% of dietary N. Decreasing NDF gave linear increases in BW gain, yield of milk, protein, true protein, lactose, and SNF, and milk/DM intake and milk N/N intake, and linear decreases in milk urea. However, fat yield was lower on 28% than 32% NDF. Reducing NDF from 36 to 28% increased purine derivative excretion by 19%, suggesting increased microbial protein. Increasing CP by adding soybean meal to diets fed cows averaging 34 kg/d of milk increased intake and fat yield but depressed N efficiency. Increasing dietary energy by reducing forage improved milk yield and efficiency and decreased excretion of environmentally labile urinary N.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Diet effects on urine composition of cattle and N2O emissions.

            Ruminant production contributes to emissions of nitrogen (N) to the environment, principally ammonia (NH3), nitrous oxide (N2O) and di-nitrogen (N2) to air, nitrate (NO3 -) to groundwater and particulate N to surface waters. Variation in dietary N intake will particularly affect excretion of urinary N, which is much more vulnerable to losses than is faecal N. Our objective is to review dietary effects on the level and form of N excreted in cattle urine, as well as its consequences for emissions of N2O. The quantity of N excreted in urine varies widely. Urinary N excretion, in particular that of urea N, is decreased upon reduction of dietary N intake or an increase in the supply of energy to the rumen microorganisms and to the host animal itself. Most of the N in urine (from 50% to well over 90%) is present in the form of urea. Other nitrogenous components include purine derivatives (PD), hippuric acid, creatine and creatinine. Excretion of PD is related to rumen microbial protein synthesis, and that of hippuric acid to dietary concentration of degradable phenolic acids. The N concentration of cattle urine ranges from 3 to 20 g/l. High-dietary mineral levels increase urine volume and lead to reduced urinary N concentration as well as reduced urea concentration in plasma and milk. In lactating dairy cattle, variation in urine volume affects the relationship between milk urea and urinary N excretion, which hampers the use of milk urea as an accurate indicator of urinary N excretion. Following its deposition in pastures or in animal houses, ubiquitous microorganisms in soil and waters transform urinary N components into ammonium (NH4 +), and thereafter into NO3 - and ultimately in N2 accompanied with the release of N2O. Urinary hippuric acid, creatine and creatinine decompose more slowly than urea. Hippuric acid may act as a natural inhibitor of N2O emissions, but inhibition conditions have not been defined properly yet. Environmental and soil conditions at the site of urine deposition or manure application strongly influence N2O release. Major dietary strategies to mitigating N2O emission from cattle operations include reducing dietary N content or increasing energy content, and increasing dietary mineral content to increase urine volume. For further reduction of N2O emission, an integrated animal nutrition and excreta management approach is required.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Using nitrification inhibitors to mitigate agricultural N2O emission: a double-edged sword?

              Nitrification inhibitors show promise in decreasing nitrous oxide (N2 O) emission from agricultural systems worldwide, but they may be much less effective than previously thought when both direct and indirect emissions are taken into account. Whilst nitrification inhibitors are effective at decreasing direct N2 O emission and nitrate (NO3- ) leaching, limited studies suggest that they may increase ammonia (NH3 ) volatilization and, subsequently, indirect N2 O emission. These dual effects are typically not considered when evaluating the inhibitors as a climate change mitigation tool. Here, we collate results from the literature that simultaneously examined the effects of nitrification inhibitors on N2 O and NH3 emissions. We found that nitrification inhibitors decreased direct N2 O emission by 0.2-4.5 kg N2 O-N ha-1 (8-57%), but generally increased NH3 emission by 0.2-18.7 kg NH3 -N ha-1 (3-65%). Taking into account the estimated indirect N2 O emission from deposited NH3 , the overall impact of nitrification inhibitors ranged from -4.5 (reduction) to +0.5 (increase) kg N2 O-N ha-1 . Our results suggest that the beneficial effect of nitrification inhibitors in decreasing direct N2 O emission can be undermined or even outweighed by an increase in NH3 volatilization.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Sci Total Environ
                Sci. Total Environ
                The Science of the Total Environment
                Elsevier
                0048-9697
                1879-1026
                01 September 2018
                01 September 2018
                : 635
                : 607-617
                Affiliations
                [a ]School of Environment, Natural Resources and Geography, Bangor University, Bangor LL57 2UW, UK
                [b ]Rothamsted Research, North Wyke, Devon EX20 2SB, UK
                [c ]ADAS Boxworth, Battlegate Rd., Cambridge CB23 4NN, UK
                [d ]Agri-Food and Biosciences Institute, 18a, Newforge Lane, BT9 5PX, Belfast, UK
                [e ]Scotland's Rural College (SRUC), West Mains Road, Edinburgh EH9 3JG, UK
                [f ]ADAS Wolverhampton, Titan 1 offices, Coxwell Avenue, Wolverhampton Science Park, Wolverhampton WV10 9RT, UK
                Author notes
                [* ]Corresponding author. d.chadwick@ 123456bangor.ac.uk
                Article
                S0048-9697(18)31324-X
                10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.04.152
                6024564
                29679833
                7a9f136d-592c-42b3-bdec-9e68cd52ad2d
                © 2018 The Authors

                This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

                History
                : 12 March 2018
                : 10 April 2018
                : 10 April 2018
                Categories
                Article

                General environmental science
                grassland,greenhouse gas,nitrous oxide,cattle,urine patch,dung pat,nitrification inhibitor,dicyandiamide,inventory

                Comments

                Comment on this article