7
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Multiple antigen-engineered DC vaccines with or without IFNα to promote antitumor immunity in melanoma

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Cancer vaccines are designed to promote systemic antitumor immunity and tumor eradication. Cancer vaccination may be more efficacious in combination with additional interventions that may build on or amplify their effects.

          Methods

          Based on our previous clinical and in vitro studies, we designed an antigen-engineered DC vaccine trial to promote a polyclonal CD8 + and CD4 + T cell response against three shared melanoma antigens. The 35 vaccine recipients were then randomized to receive one month of high-dose IFNα or observation.

          Results

          The resulting clinical outcomes were 2 partial responses, 8 stable disease and 14 progressive disease among patients with measurable disease using RECIST 1.1, and, of 11 surgically treated patients with no evidence of disease (NED), 4 remain NED at a median follow-up of 3 years. The majority of vaccinated patients showed an increase in vaccine antigen-specific CD8 + and CD4 + T cell responses. The addition of IFNα did not appear to improve immune or clinical responses in this trial. Examination of the DC vaccine profiles showed that IL-12p70 secretion did not correlate with immune or clinical responses. In depth immune biomarker studies support the importance of circulating Treg and MDSC for development of antigen-specific T cell responses, and of circulating CD8 + and CD4 + T cell subsets in clinical responses.

          Conclusions

          DC vaccines are a safe and reliable platform for promoting antitumor immunity. This combination with one month of high dose IFNα did not improve outcomes. Immune biomarker analysis in the blood identified several predictive and prognostic biomarkers for further analysis, including MDSC.

          Trial registration

          NCT01622933.

          Electronic supplementary material

          The online version of this article (10.1186/s40425-019-0552-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

          Related collections

          Most cited references60

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Cancer immunotherapy: moving beyond current vaccines.

          Great progress has been made in the field of tumor immunology in the past decade, but optimism about the clinical application of currently available cancer vaccine approaches is based more on surrogate endpoints than on clinical tumor regression. In our cancer vaccine trials of 440 patients, the objective response rate was low (2.6%), and comparable to the results obtained by others. We consider here results in cancer vaccine trials and highlight alternate strategies that mediate cancer regression in preclinical and clinical models.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            gp100 peptide vaccine and interleukin-2 in patients with advanced melanoma.

            Stimulating an immune response against cancer with the use of vaccines remains a challenge. We hypothesized that combining a melanoma vaccine with interleukin-2, an immune activating agent, could improve outcomes. In a previous phase 2 study, patients with metastatic melanoma receiving high-dose interleukin-2 plus the gp100:209-217(210M) peptide vaccine had a higher rate of response than the rate that is expected among patients who are treated with interleukin-2 alone. We conducted a randomized, phase 3 trial involving 185 patients at 21 centers. Eligibility criteria included stage IV or locally advanced stage III cutaneous melanoma, expression of HLA*A0201, an absence of brain metastases, and suitability for high-dose interleukin-2 therapy. Patients were randomly assigned to receive interleukin-2 alone (720,000 IU per kilogram of body weight per dose) or gp100:209-217(210M) plus incomplete Freund's adjuvant (Montanide ISA-51) once per cycle, followed by interleukin-2. The primary end point was clinical response. Secondary end points included toxic effects and progression-free survival. The treatment groups were well balanced with respect to baseline characteristics and received a similar amount of interleukin-2 per cycle. The toxic effects were consistent with those expected with interleukin-2 therapy. The vaccine-interleukin-2 group, as compared with the interleukin-2-only group, had a significant improvement in centrally verified overall clinical response (16% vs. 6%, P=0.03), as well as longer progression-free survival (2.2 months; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.7 to 3.9 vs. 1.6 months; 95% CI, 1.5 to 1.8; P=0.008). The median overall survival was also longer in the vaccine-interleukin-2 group than in the interleukin-2-only group (17.8 months; 95% CI, 11.9 to 25.8 vs. 11.1 months; 95% CI, 8.7 to 16.3; P=0.06). In patients with advanced melanoma, the response rate was higher and progression-free survival longer with vaccine and interleukin-2 than with interleukin-2 alone. (Funded by the National Cancer Institute and others; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00019682.).
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Cross-priming of CD8+ T cells stimulated by virus-induced type I interferon.

              CD8+ T cell responses can be generated against antigens that are not expressed directly within antigen-presenting cells (APCs), through a process known as cross-priming. To initiate cross-priming, APCs must both capture extracellular antigen and receive specific activation signals. We have investigated the nature of APC activation signals associated with virus infection that stimulate cross-priming. We show that infection with lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus induces cross-priming by a mechanism dependent on type I interferon (IFN-alpha/beta). Activation of cross-priming by IFN-alpha/beta was independent of CD4+ T cell help or interaction of CD40 and CD40 ligand, and involved direct stimulation of dendritic cells. These data identify expression of IFN-alpha/beta as a mechanism for the induction of cross-priming during virus infections.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                412-623-1418 , lbutterfield@parkerici.org , lisa.butterfield@ucsf.edu
                Journal
                J Immunother Cancer
                J Immunother Cancer
                Journal for Immunotherapy of Cancer
                BioMed Central (London )
                2051-1426
                24 April 2019
                24 April 2019
                2019
                : 7
                : 113
                Affiliations
                [1 ]ISNI 0000 0004 1936 9000, GRID grid.21925.3d, Department of Medicine, , University of Pittsburgh, UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, ; 5117 Centre Avenue, Suite 1.27, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA
                [2 ]ISNI 0000 0004 1936 9000, GRID grid.21925.3d, Department of Surgery, , University of Pittsburgh, UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, ; 5117 Centre Avenue, Suite 1.27, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA
                [3 ]ISNI 0000 0004 1936 9000, GRID grid.21925.3d, Department of Immunology, , University of Pittsburgh, UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, ; 5117 Centre Avenue, Suite 1.27, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA
                [4 ]ISNI 0000 0004 1936 9000, GRID grid.21925.3d, UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, , University of Pittsburgh, UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, ; 5117 Centre Avenue, Suite 1.27, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA
                [5 ]ISNI 0000 0004 1936 9000, GRID grid.21925.3d, Department of Biomedical Informatics, , University of Pittsburgh, ; Pittsburgh, PA USA
                [6 ]ISNI 0000 0004 1936 9000, GRID grid.21925.3d, Department of Biostatistics, , University of Pittsburgh, ; Pittsburgh, PA USA
                [7 ]ISNI 0000 0001 0662 3178, GRID grid.12527.33, Present address: Tsinghua University School of Medicine, ; Beijing, China
                [8 ]ISNI 0000 0001 2291 4776, GRID grid.240145.6, Present address: Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, , University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, ; Houston, TX USA
                [9 ]ISNI 0000 0001 0675 4725, GRID grid.239578.2, Present address: Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Institute, ; Cleveland, OH USA
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3439-9844
                Article
                552
                10.1186/s40425-019-0552-x
                6480917
                31014399
                7ac6e6bd-946a-476f-a086-4dfaa4a8850e
                © The Author(s). 2019

                Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

                History
                : 24 November 2018
                : 27 February 2019
                Funding
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100000054, National Cancer Institute;
                Award ID: P50 CA121973
                Award Recipient :
                Categories
                Research Article
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2019

                cancer vaccine,immune biomarkers,tumor immunity,shared antigens,melanoma

                Comments

                Comment on this article