11
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Assessment of five different guideline indication criteria for spirometry, including modified GOLD criteria, in order to detect COPD: data from 5,315 subjects in the PLATINO study

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background:

          Spirometry is the gold standard for diagnosing chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Although there are a number of different guideline criteria for deciding who should be selected for spirometric screening, to date it is not known which criteria are the best based on sensitivity and specificity.

          Aims:

          Firstly, to evaluate the proportion of subjects in the PLATINO Study that would be recommended for spirometry testing according to Global initiative for Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD)-modified, American College of Chest Physicians (ACCP), National Lung Health Education Program (NLHEP), GOLD and American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society (ATS/ERS) criteria. Secondly, we aimed to compare the sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive and negative predictive values, of these five different criteria.

          Methods:

          Data from the PLATINO study included information on respiratory symptoms, smoking and previous spirometry testing. The GOLD-modified spirometry indication criteria are based on three positive answers out of five questions: the presence of cough, phlegm in the morning, dyspnoea, age over 40 years and smoking status.

          Results:

          Data from 5,315 subjects were reviewed. Fewer people had an indication for spirometry (41.3%) according to the GOLD-modified criteria, and more people had an indication for spirometry (80.4%) by the GOLD and ATS/ERS criteria. A low percentage had previously had spirometry performed: GOLD-modified (14.5%); ACCP (13.2%); NLHEP (12.6%); and GOLD and ATS/ERS (12.3%). The GOLD-modified criteria showed the least sensitivity (54.9) and the highest specificity (61.0) for detecting COPD, whereas GOLD and ATS/ERS criteria showed the highest sensitivity (87.9) and the least specificity (20.8).

          Conclusion:

          There is a considerable difference in the indication for spirometry according to the five different guideline criteria. The GOLD-modified criteria recruit less people with the greatest sum of sensitivity and specificity.

          Related collections

          Most cited references28

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Standards for the diagnosis and treatment of patients with COPD: a summary of the ATS/ERS position paper.

          W MacNee, , B Celli (2004)
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Epidemiology Standardization Project (American Thoracic Society).

            B G Ferris (1978)
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Screening for and early detection of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

              Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a substantially underdiagnosed disorder, with the diagnosis typically missed or delayed until the condition is advanced. Spirometry is the most frequently used pulmonary function test and enables health professionals to make an objective measurement of airflow obstruction and assess the degree to which it is reversible. As a diagnostic test for COPD, spirometry is a reliable, simple, non-invasive, safe, and non-expensive procedure. Early diagnosis of COPD should provide support for smoking cessation initiatives and lead to reduction of the societal burden of the disease, but definitive confirmation of both proves elusive. Despite substantial effort and investment, implementation of quality spirometry is deficient because of several hurdles and limitations, described in this Review. All in all, spirometry is recognised as the essential test for diagnosis and monitoring of COPD.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                NPJ Prim Care Respir Med
                NPJ Prim Care Respir Med
                NPJ Primary Care Respiratory Medicine
                Nature Publishing Group
                2055-1010
                30 October 2014
                2014
                : 24
                : 14075
                Affiliations
                [1 ] Respiratory Division, Universidade Federal de São Paulo , São Paulo, Brazil
                [2 ] Epidemiology Division, Universidade Federal de Pelotas , Pelotas, Brazil
                [3 ] Respiratory Division, Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Respiratorias , Mexico City, Mexico
                [4 ] Respiratory Division, Universidad de la República , Montevideo, Uruguay
                [5 ] Respiratory Division, Pontifícia Universidad Católica de Chile , Santiago, Chile
                [6 ] Respiratory Division, Universidad Central de Venezuela , Caracas, Venezuela
                [7 ] Brighans Women´s Hospital, Harvard University , Boston, MA, USA
                Author notes
                []

                All authors participared in designing the Study and reviewed the text. Other functions: Ana M Menezes, coordinator of PLATINO Study; Rogelio Perez-Padilla, rewier of spirometries and quality control; Adriana Muiño and Maria Victorina, investigators in Montevideu; Valdivia and Carmen Lisboa, investigators in Santiago; Oliver A Nascimento and José R Jardim, investigators in São Paulo.

                Article
                npjpcrm201475
                10.1038/npjpcrm.2014.75
                4373468
                25358021
                7ae996ef-b2c8-4d28-8aab-1ce706080e2a
                Copyright © 2014 Primary Care Respiratory Society UK/Macmillan Publishers Limited

                This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

                History
                : 08 April 2014
                : 04 July 2014
                : 05 August 2014
                Categories
                Article

                Comments

                Comment on this article