22
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      New directions in hypnosis research: strategies for advancing the cognitive and clinical neuroscience of hypnosis

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          This article summarizes key advances in hypnosis research during the past two decades, including (i) clinical research supporting the efficacy of hypnosis for managing a number of clinical symptoms and conditions, (ii) research supporting the role of various divisions in the anterior cingulate and prefrontal cortices in hypnotic responding, and (iii) an emerging finding that high hypnotic suggestibility is associated with atypical brain connectivity profiles. Key recommendations for a research agenda for the next decade include the recommendations that (i) laboratory hypnosis researchers should strongly consider how they assess hypnotic suggestibility in their studies, (ii) inclusion of study participants who score in the middle range of hypnotic suggestibility, and (iii) use of expanding research designs that more clearly delineate the roles of inductions and specific suggestions. Finally, we make two specific suggestions for helping to move the field forward including (i) the use of data sharing and (ii) redirecting resources away from contrasting state and nonstate positions toward studying (a) the efficacy of hypnotic treatments for clinical conditions influenced by central nervous system processes and (b) the neurophysiological underpinnings of hypnotic phenomena. As we learn more about the neurophysiological mechanisms underlying hypnosis and suggestion, we will strengthen our knowledge of both basic brain functions and a host of different psychological functions.

          Related collections

          Most cited references132

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          The neuroscience of mindfulness meditation.

          Research over the past two decades broadly supports the claim that mindfulness meditation - practiced widely for the reduction of stress and promotion of health - exerts beneficial effects on physical and mental health, and cognitive performance. Recent neuroimaging studies have begun to uncover the brain areas and networks that mediate these positive effects. However, the underlying neural mechanisms remain unclear, and it is apparent that more methodologically rigorous studies are required if we are to gain a full understanding of the neuronal and molecular bases of the changes in the brain that accompany mindfulness meditation.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Attention regulation and monitoring in meditation.

            Meditation can be conceptualized as a family of complex emotional and attentional regulatory training regimes developed for various ends, including the cultivation of well-being and emotional balance. Among these various practices, there are two styles that are commonly studied. One style, focused attention meditation, entails the voluntary focusing of attention on a chosen object. The other style, open monitoring meditation, involves nonreactive monitoring of the content of experience from moment to moment. The potential regulatory functions of these practices on attention and emotion processes could have a long-term impact on the brain and behavior.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Central cancellation of self-produced tickle sensation.

              A self-produced tactile stimulus is perceived as less ticklish than the same stimulus generated externally. We used fMRI to examine neural responses when subjects experienced a tactile stimulus that was either self-produced or externally produced. More activity was found in somatosensory cortex when the stimulus was externally produced. In the cerebellum, less activity was associated with a movement that generated a tactile stimulus than with a movement that did not. This difference suggests that the cerebellum is involved in predicting the specific sensory consequences of movements, providing the signal that is used to cancel the sensory response to self-generated stimulation.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                101679109
                45043
                Neurosci Conscious
                Neurosci Conscious
                Neuroscience of consciousness
                2057-2107
                22 June 2017
                12 April 2017
                2017
                11 October 2017
                : 3
                : 1
                : nix004
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98104, USA
                [2 ]School of Behavioural, Cognitive, and Social Sciences, University of New England, Armidale, Australia
                [3 ]Lyon Neuroscience Research Center, Lyon, France
                [4 ]School of Life Sciences, University of Hull, Hull, UK
                [5 ]School of Psychological Sciences and Health, University of Strathclyde, UK
                [6 ]Department of Translational Research and New Technologies, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
                [7 ]Institut du Cerveau et de la Moelle épinière (ICM), Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France and Coma Science Group, GIGA Research, University and University hospital of Liège, Belgium
                [8 ]Department of Psychology, La Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
                [9 ]Department of Psychology, University of Budapest, Budapest, Hungary
                [10 ]Institut für Psychologie, University of Graz, Graz, Austria
                [11 ]Department of Neuroscience, Laboratory for Behavioral Neurology and Imaging of Cognition, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
                [12 ]Department of Algology — Palliative Care, University Hospital of Liege, University of Liège, Liège, Belgium
                [13 ]Department of Psychology, Goldsmiths, University of London, London, UK
                Author notes
                [* ]Correspondence address. mjensen@ 123456uw.edu
                [†]

                William J. McGeown- http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7943-5901

                Article
                NIHMS886578
                10.1093/nc/nix004
                5635845
                29034102
                7af8378a-a8d8-497c-9dd0-fd8ddde69b15

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@ 123456oup.com

                History
                Categories
                Article

                consciousness,hypnosis,hypnotic suggestibility,hypnotizability

                Comments

                Comment on this article