8
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Variations in Facial Nerve Branches and Anatomical Landmarks for Its Trunk Identification: A Pilot Cadaveric Study in the Lithuanian Population

      research-article
      1 , , 1
      ,
      Cureus
      Cureus
      double trunk, facial nerve, facial nerve palsy, parotidectomy, tragal pointer

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Objective

          The purpose of this study was to evaluate facial nerve (FN) branching variations based on Davis and Kopuz classifications in the Lithuanian population and measure the shortest distance from the facial nerve trunk (FNT) to its anatomical landmarks.

          Methods

          Twenty-two hemifaces of 11 cadavers were dissected. The preauricular skin cut was made and extended behind the ear lobe and along the inferior border of the mandible. The skin with subcutaneous tissue and superficial fascia were separated and medially retracted, and the parotid gland was dissected anterogradely. The FNT and its furcation type and branching pattern were disclosed and noted based on Davis and Kopuz classifications. Further, the shortest distance from the FNT to the anatomical landmarks of the tragal pointer (TP), the angle of mandible (AM), and the tip of mastoid process (TMP) was measured.

          Results

          The prevalence of branching patterns did not differ significantly compared to Davis classification. Based on Kopuz, type IVA pattern was the most common in six cases (27%). Eighteen (82%) trunks split as bifurcations and two (9%) trifurcations, while two (9%) had separate double trunks. The shortest distance (mm) from the FNT to the TP is 9.30 ± 0.93, AM 36.45 ± 4.14, and TMP 12.52 ± 2.30.

          Conclusion

          The prevalence of FN variations in the Lithuanian population is similar to Davis classification. The AM and TMP are consistent superficial bony landmarks for trunk identification, while the distance from the TP highly varies among studies. Surgeons should be aware of double FNT during parotidectomy, which is described in Kopuz classification.

          Related collections

          Most cited references28

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Surgical anatomy of the facial nerve and parotid gland based upon a study of 350 cervicofacial halves.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            Parotid gland tumors: a retrospective study of 154 patients ☆ ☆☆

            Introduction Benign tumors of the parotid gland comprise the majority of salivary gland tumors. Objective To review the clinical characteristics of parotid gland tumors submitted to surgical treatment by the same surgeon. Methods Retrospective study with 154 patients who had parotid gland tumors. Clinical and histological data, type of surgery, and complications were assessed and described. Results The main manifestation was a mass with a median evolution of 12 months for benign tumors and five months for malignant tumors. Ultrasonography was the most frequent complementary exam. Pleomorphic adenoma was the most common of the benign tumors, and mucoepidermoid carcinoma was the most frequent malignant tumor. Superficial parotidectomy with preservation of the facial nerve was the most common surgical procedure and reversible paresis of branches of the facial nerve was the most common complication. Conclusions Pleomorphic adenoma is the most common parotid gland tumor and superficial parotidectomy with preservation of the facial nerve is the most common and appropriate treatment for most low-morbidity tumors.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Landmarks of the facial nerve: implications for parotidectomy.

              Facial nerve paralysis is a daunting potential complication of parotid surgery and is widely reported. Knowledge of the key landmarks of the facial nerve trunk is essential for safe and effective surgical intervention in the region of the parotid gland. In current practice, wide ranges of landmarks are used to identify the facial nerve trunk, however, there is much debate in the literature about the safety and reliability of each of these landmarks. The aim of this study, therefore, was to evaluate the relation of the surrounding anatomical structures and surgical landmarks to the facial nerve trunk. The anatomical relationship of the facial nerve trunk to the surrounding structures was determined after micro-dissection on 40 adult cadavers. The shortest distances between the facial nerve and the "tragal pointer", attachment of the posterior belly of digastric muscle, tympanomastoid suture, external auditory canal, transverse process of the axis, angle of the mandible and the styloid process were measured. In addition, these distances were compared in the right and left sides, males and females and edentulous and non-edentulous mandibles. The distance of the facial nerve trunk from each of the surrounding landmarks ranged from (mm): tragal pointer, 24.3 to 49.2 (mean 34); posterior belly of digastric, 9.7 to 24.3 (mean 14.6); external auditory canal, 7.3 to 21.9 (mean 13.4); tympanomastoid suture, 4.9 to 18.6 (mean 10.0); styloid process, 4.3 to 18.6 (mean 9.8); transverse process of the axis, 9.7 to 36.8 (mean 16.9); angle of the mandible, 25.3 to 48.69 (mean 38.1). The length of the facial nerve trunk from its point of exit from the stylomastoid foramen to its bifurcation into upper and lower divisions ranged from (mm) 8.6 to 22.8 (mean 14.0). The results demonstrated that the posterior belly of digastric, tragal pointer and transverse process of the axis are consistent landmarks to the facial nerve trunk. However, it should be noted that the tragal pointer is cartilaginous, mobile, asymmetrical and has a blunt, irregular tip. This study advocates the use of the transverse process of the axis as it is easily palpated, does not require a complex dissection and ensures minimum risk of injury to the facial nerve trunk.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Cureus
                Cureus
                2168-8184
                Cureus
                Cureus (Palo Alto (CA) )
                2168-8184
                8 November 2019
                November 2019
                : 11
                : 11
                : e6100
                Affiliations
                [1 ] Department of Anatomy, Histology, and Anthropology, Vilnius University Faculty of Medicine, Vilnius, LTU
                Author notes
                Dominykas Stankevicius dominykas.st@ 123456gmail.com
                Article
                10.7759/cureus.6100
                6901372
                31886041
                7b036ceb-61e7-4714-8a2f-e9d485327645
                Copyright © 2019, Stankevicius et al.

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

                History
                : 24 October 2019
                : 8 November 2019
                Categories
                Otolaryngology
                Anatomy

                double trunk,facial nerve,facial nerve palsy,parotidectomy,tragal pointer

                Comments

                Comment on this article