4
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Multicenter Comparative Study of Six Cryptosporidium parvum DNA Extraction Protocols Including Mechanical Pretreatment from Stool Samples

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background: Nowadays, many commercial kits allow the detection of Cryptosporidium sp. in stool samples after deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) extraction. Protocols of stool pretreatment have been proposed to optimize oocysts’ DNA extraction. Among them, mechanical grinding was reported to improve the performance of Cryptosporidium oocysts’ DNA extraction. Methods: A multicenter comparative study was conducted within the framework of the French National Reference Center-Expert Laboratory for Cryptosporidiosis. Six extraction systems (i.e., manual or automated) associated with various mechanical pretreatment protocols, were compared for the Cryptosporidium parvum oocyst’ DNA extraction, before amplification using the same real-time PCR method targeting. Results: The sensitivity of real-time PCR assay was unequally impacted by the pretreatment/extraction protocol. We observed significant differences for the lowest concentrations of C. parvum oocysts (i.e., 0–94.4% and 33.3–100% respectively for 10 and 50 oocysts/mL). All in all, the protocol using Quick DNA Fecal/Soil Microbe-Miniprep ® manual kit showed the best performances. In addition, optimal performances of mechanical pretreatment were obtained by combining a grinding duration of 60 s with a speed of 4 m/s using Fastprep24 ® with Lysing Matrix E ®. Conclusions: Sample pretreatment, as well as the extraction method, needs to be properly adapted to improve the diagnostic performances of the C. parvum DNA amplification methods.

          Related collections

          Most cited references39

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The infectivity of Cryptosporidium parvum in healthy volunteers.

          Small numbers of Cryptosporidium parvum oocysts can contaminate even treated drinking water, and ingestion of oocysts can cause diarrheal disease in normal as well as immunocompromised hosts. Since the number of organisms necessary to cause infection in humans is unknown, we performed a study to determine the infective dose of the parasite in healthy adults. After providing informed consent, 29 healthy volunteers without evidence of previous C. parvum infection, as determined by the absence of anti-cryptosporidium-specific antibodies, were given a single dose of 30 to 1 million C. parvum oocysts obtained from a calf. They were then monitored for oocyst excretion and clinical illness for eight weeks. Household contacts were monitored for secondary spread. Of the 16 subjects who received an intended dose of 300 or more oocysts, 14 (88 percent) became infected. After a dose of 30 oocysts, one of five subjects (20 percent) became infected, whereas at a dose of 1000 or more oocysts, seven of seven became infected. The median infective dose, calculated by linear regression, was 132 oocysts. Of the 18 subjects who excreted oocysts after the challenge dose, 11 had enteric symptoms and 7 (39 percent) had clinical cryptosporidiosis, consisting of diarrhea plus at least one other enteric symptom. All recovered, and there were no secondary cases of diarrhea among household contacts. In healthy adults with no serologic evidence of past infection with C. parvum, a low dose of C. parvum oocysts is sufficient to cause infection.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Waterborne transmission of protozoan parasites: Review of worldwide outbreaks - An update 2011-2016.

            This review provides a comprehensive update of worldwide waterborne parasitic protozoan outbreaks that occurred with reports published since previous reviews largely between January 2011 and December 2016. At least 381 outbreaks attributed to waterborne transmission of parasitic protozoa were documented during this time period. The nearly half (49%) of reports occurred in New Zealand, 41% of the outbreaks in North America and 9% in Europe. The most common etiological agent was Cryptosporidium spp., reported in 63% (239) of the outbreaks, while Giardia spp. was mentioned in 37% (142). No outbreaks attributed to other parasitic protozoa were reported. The distribution of reported outbreaks does not correspond to more broadly available epidemiological data or general knowledge of water and environmental conditions in the reporting countries. Noticeably, developing countries that are probably most affected by such waterborne disease outbreaks still lack reliable surveillance systems, and an international standardization of surveillance and reporting systems has yet to be established.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Unravelling Cryptosporidium and Giardia epidemiology.

              Molecular biology has provided insights into the taxonomy and epidemiology of Cryptosporidium and Giardia, which are major causes of protozoal diarrhoea in humans worldwide. For both genera, previously unrecognized differences in disease, symptomatology, zoonotic potential, risk factors and environmental contamination have been identified using molecular tools that are appropriate for species, genotype and subtype analysis. In this article, to improve understanding of the epidemiology of cryptosporidiosis and giardiasis, we consider specific requirements for the development of more-effective molecular identification and genotyping systems that should be applicable to both clinical and environmental samples.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Microorganisms
                Microorganisms
                microorganisms
                Microorganisms
                MDPI
                2076-2607
                22 September 2020
                September 2020
                : 8
                : 9
                : 1450
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Laboratoire de Parasitologie-Mycologie, Plateforme de Biologie Hospitalo-Universitaire, 2 rue A. Ducoudray, BP 37013, CEDEX, 21070 Dijon, France; nicolas.valeix@ 123456chu-dijon.fr (N.V.); louise.basmaciyan@ 123456chu-dijon.fr (L.B.); stephane.valot@ 123456chu-dijon.fr (S.V.); anne.lamy@ 123456chu-dijon.fr (A.V.)
                [2 ]Laboratoire de Parasitologie-Mycologie, Centre Hospitalo-Universitaire C. Nicolle de Rouen, 76000 Rouen, France; damien.costa@ 123456chu-rouen.fr (D.C.); romy.razakandrainibe@ 123456univ-rouen.fr (R.R.); loic.favennec@ 123456chu-rouen.fr (L.F.)
                [3 ]Centre National de Référence–Laboratoire Expert des Cryptosporidioses, Institut de Biologie Clinique, Centre Hospitalo-Universitaire C. Nicolle de Rouen, 76000 Rouen, France
                [4 ]UMR PAM, University Bourgogne Franche-Comté-AgroSup Dijon-Equipe Vin, Aliment, Microbiologie, Stress, CEDEX, 21078 Dijon, France
                [5 ]Univ. Rennes, CHU Rennes, Inserm, EHESP, Irset (Institut de Recherche en Santé Environnement Travail), UMR_S 1085, 35000 Rennes, France; florence.robert-gangneux@ 123456univ-rennes1.fr
                [6 ]Laboratoire de Parasitologie-Mycologie, Centre Hospitalo-Universitaire de Clermont-Ferrand, 63000 Clermont-Ferrand, France; c_nourrisson@ 123456chu-clermontferrand.fr (C.N.); bpereira@ 123456chu-clermontferrand.fr (B.P.); ppoirier@ 123456chu-clermontferrand.fr (P.P.)
                [7 ]CHU Lille, Laboratoire de Parasitologie-Mycologie, F-59000 Lille, France; emilie.frealle@ 123456chru-lille.fr
                [8 ]Univ. Lille, CNRS, Inserm, CHU Lille, Institut Pasteur de Lille, U1019–UMR8204-CIIL-Center for Infection and Immunity of Lille, F-59000 Lille, France
                Author notes
                [* ]Correspondence: frederic.dalle@ 123456chu-dijon.fr ; Tel.: +33-(0)-380-295014
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4214-8022
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4493-596X
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4003-805X
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3778-7161
                Article
                microorganisms-08-01450
                10.3390/microorganisms8091450
                7564494
                32971858
                7b24ef49-dae2-421a-a22e-13f6554b9ce1
                © 2020 by the authors.

                Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

                History
                : 18 August 2020
                : 20 September 2020
                Categories
                Article

                cryptosporidium parvum,grinding,dna extraction,stool samples,real-time pcr,molecular diagnosis

                Comments

                Comment on this article