3
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Utilization of machine learning for identifying symptom severity military-related PTSD subtypes and their biological correlates

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          We sought to find clinical subtypes of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) in veterans 6–10 years post-trauma exposure based on current symptom assessments and to examine whether blood biomarkers could differentiate them. Samples were males deployed to Iraq and Afghanistan studied by the PTSD Systems Biology Consortium: a discovery sample of 74 PTSD cases and 71 healthy controls (HC), and a validation sample of 26 PTSD cases and 36 HC. A machine learning method, random forests (RF), in conjunction with a clustering method, partitioning around medoids, were used to identify subtypes derived from 16 self-report and clinician assessment scales, including the clinician-administered PTSD scale for DSM-IV (CAPS). Two subtypes were identified, designated S1 and S2, differing on mean current CAPS total scores: S2 = 75.6 (sd 14.6) and S1 = 54.3 (sd 6.6). S2 had greater symptom severity scores than both S1 and HC on all scale items. The mean first principal component score derived from clinical summary scales was three times higher in S2 than in S1. Distinct RFs were grown to classify S1 and S2 vs. HCs and vs. each other on multi-omic blood markers feature classes of current medical comorbidities, neurocognitive functioning, demographics, pre-military trauma, and psychiatric history. Among these classes, in each RF intergroup comparison of S1, S2, and HC, multi-omic biomarkers yielded the highest AUC-ROCs (0.819–0.922); other classes added little to further discrimination of the subtypes. Among the top five biomarkers in each of these RFs were methylation, micro RNA, and lactate markers, suggesting their biological role in symptom severity.

          Related collections

          Most cited references38

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Silhouettes: A graphical aid to the interpretation and validation of cluster analysis

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            The Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale for DSM-5 (CAPS-5): Development and Initial Psychometric Evaluation in Military Veterans.

            The Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale (CAPS) is an extensively validated and widely used structured diagnostic interview for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). The CAPS was recently revised to correspond with PTSD criteria in the fifth edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5; American Psychiatric Association, 2013). This article describes the development of the CAPS for DSM-5 (CAPS-5) and presents the results of an initial psychometric evaluation of CAPS-5 scores in 2 samples of military veterans (Ns = 165 and 207). CAPS-5 diagnosis demonstrated strong interrater reliability (к = .78 to 1.00, depending on the scoring rule) and test-retest reliability (к = .83), as well as strong correspondence with a diagnosis based on the CAPS for DSM-IV (CAPS-IV; к = .84 when optimally calibrated). CAPS-5 total severity score demonstrated high internal consistency (α = .88) and interrater reliability (ICC = .91) and good test-retest reliability (ICC = .78). It also demonstrated good convergent validity with total severity score on the CAPS-IV (r = .83) and PTSD Checklist for DSM-5 (r = .66) and good discriminant validity with measures of anxiety, depression, somatization, functional impairment, psychopathy, and alcohol abuse (rs = .02 to .54). Overall, these results indicate that the CAPS-5 is a psychometrically sound measure of DSM-5 PTSD diagnosis and symptom severity. Importantly, the CAPS-5 strongly corresponds with the CAPS-IV, which suggests that backward compatibility with the CAPS-IV was maintained and that the CAPS-5 provides continuity in evidence-based assessment of PTSD in the transition from DSM-IV to DSM-5 criteria. (PsycINFO Database Record
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Variable selection using random forests

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Carole.Siegel@nyulangone.org
                Journal
                Transl Psychiatry
                Transl Psychiatry
                Translational Psychiatry
                Nature Publishing Group UK (London )
                2158-3188
                20 April 2021
                20 April 2021
                2021
                : 11
                : 227
                Affiliations
                [1 ]GRID grid.137628.9, ISNI 0000 0004 1936 8753, Center for Alcohol Use Disorder and PTSD, Department of Psychiatry, , New York University Grossman School of Medicine, ; New York, NY USA
                [2 ]GRID grid.137628.9, ISNI 0000 0004 1936 8753, Division of Biostatistics, Department of Population Health, , New York University Grossman School of Medicine, ; New York, NY USA
                [3 ]GRID grid.274295.f, ISNI 0000 0004 0420 1184, Department of Psychiatry, , James J. Peters VA Medical Center, ; Bronx, NY USA
                [4 ]GRID grid.59734.3c, ISNI 0000 0001 0670 2351, Department of Psychiatry, , Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, ; New York, NY USA
                [5 ]GRID grid.507680.c, ISNI 0000 0001 2230 3166, Military Readiness Systems Biology, , Walter Reed Army Institute of Research, ; Silver Spring, MD USA
                [6 ]GRID grid.56061.34, ISNI 0000 0000 9560 654X, Departments of Biological Sciences and Computer Science, , The University of Memphis, ; Memphis, TN USA
                [7 ]GRID grid.38142.3c, ISNI 000000041936754X, Department of Systems Biology, , Harvard University, ; Cambridge, MA USA
                [8 ]GRID grid.38142.3c, ISNI 000000041936754X, Harvard John A. Paulson School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, , Harvard University, ; Cambridge, MA USA
                [9 ]GRID grid.266102.1, ISNI 0000 0001 2297 6811, Department of Psychiatry, , University of California, ; San Francisco, CA USA
                [10 ]GRID grid.266102.1, ISNI 0000 0001 2297 6811, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, & Reproductive Sciences, , University of California, ; San Francisco, CA USA
                [11 ]GRID grid.240206.2, ISNI 0000 0000 8795 072X, Department of Psychiatry, , McLean Hospital, ; Belmont, MA USA
                [12 ]GRID grid.64212.33, ISNI 0000 0004 0463 2320, Institute for Systems Biology, ; Seattle, WA USA
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7460-788X
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1990-6788
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3068-8662
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0655-5042
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5158-1103
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2899-0216
                Article
                1324
                10.1038/s41398-021-01324-8
                8058082
                33879773
                7b47bf09-dd0e-40c7-92bb-ee43ae0df957
                © The Author(s) 2021

                Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

                History
                : 9 April 2020
                : 23 February 2021
                : 16 March 2021
                Funding
                Funded by: FundRef https://doi.org/10.13039/100006751, United States Department of Defense | U.S. Army (United States Army);
                Award ID: W81XWH-18-C-0160
                Award ID: W911NF-17-1-0069
                Award ID: W81XWH-18-C-0160
                Award ID: W911NF-17-1-0069
                Award ID: W81XWH-18-C-0160
                Award ID: W911NF-17-1-0069
                Award ID: W81XWH-18-C-0160
                Award ID: W911NF-17-1-0069
                Award ID: W81XWH-18-C-0160
                Award ID: W911NF-17-1-0069
                Award ID: W81XWH-18-C-0160
                Award ID: W911NF-17-1-0069
                Award ID: W911NF-17-1-0069
                Award ID: W81XWH-18-C-0160
                Award ID: W81XWH-18-C-0160
                Award ID: W911NF-17-1-0069
                Award ID: W81XWH-18-C-0160
                Award ID: W911NF-17-1-0069
                Award ID: W81XWH-18-C-0160
                Award ID: W911NF-17-1-0069
                Award ID: W81XWH-18-C-0160
                Award ID: W911NF-17-1-0069
                Award ID: W81XWH-18-C-0160
                Award ID: W911NF-17-1-0069
                Award ID: W81XWH-18-C-0160
                Award ID: W911NF-17-1-0069
                Award ID: W81XWH-18-C-0160
                Award ID: W911NF-17-1-0069
                Award ID: W81XWH-18-C-0160
                Award ID: W911NF-17-1-0069
                Award ID: W911NF-17-1-0069
                Award ID: W81XWH-18-C-0160
                Award Recipient :
                Categories
                Article
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2021

                Clinical Psychology & Psychiatry
                diagnostic markers,scientific community
                Clinical Psychology & Psychiatry
                diagnostic markers, scientific community

                Comments

                Comment on this article