6
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      The challenge of monitoring elusive large carnivores: An accurate and cost-effective tool to identify and sex pumas ( Puma concolor) from footprints

      research-article
      1 , 2 , 3 , 1 , 2 , 3 , * , 4
      PLoS ONE
      Public Library of Science

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Acquiring reliable data on large felid populations is crucial for effective conservation and management. However, large felids, typically solitary, elusive and nocturnal, are difficult to survey. Tagging and following individuals with VHF or GPS technology is the standard approach, but costs are high and these methodologies can compromise animal welfare. Such limitations can restrict the use of these techniques at population or landscape levels. In this paper we describe a robust technique to identify and sex individual pumas from footprints. We used a standardized image collection protocol to collect a reference database of 535 footprints from 35 captive pumas over 10 facilities; 19 females (300 footprints) and 16 males (235 footprints), ranging in age from 1–20 yrs. Images were processed in JMP data visualization software, generating one hundred and twenty three measurements from each footprint. Data were analyzed using a customized model based on a pairwise trail comparison using robust cross-validated discriminant analysis with a Ward’s clustering method. Classification accuracy was consistently > 90% for individuals, and for the correct classification of footprints within trails, and > 99% for sex classification. The technique has the potential to greatly augment the methods available for studying puma and other elusive felids, and is amenable to both citizen-science and opportunistic/local community data collection efforts, particularly as the data collection protocol is inexpensive and intuitive.

          Related collections

          Most cited references64

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Use of fecal glucocorticoid metabolite measures in conservation biology research: considerations for application and interpretation.

          Fecal glucocorticoid metabolite analyses are increasingly being used by a variety of scientists (e.g., conservation biologists, animal scientists) to examine glucocorticoid (i.e., stress hormone) secretion in domestic and wild vertebrates. Adrenocortical activity (i.e., stress response) is of interest to conservation biologists because stress can alter animal behavior, reduce resistance to disease, and affect population performance. The noninvasiveness of fecal-based assessments is attractive, particularly when studying endangered species, because samples can often be obtained without disturbing the animal. Despite such advantages, many confounding factors inhibit the utility of this technique in addressing conservation problems. In particular, interpretation of fecal glucocorticoid metabolite (FGM) measures may be confounded by the length of time animals are held in captivity, normal seasonal and daily rhythms, body condition, sample storage and treatment techniques, diet of the animal, assay selection, animal status (i.e., social ranking, reproductive status), sample age and condition, and sample mass. Further complicating interpretation and utility of these measures is the apparent species-specific response to these factors. The purpose of this paper is to discuss the factors that confound interpretation of FGM measures, summarize research that addresses these issues, and offer an agenda for future research and interpretation. We urge conservation biologists to carefully consider confounding factors and the relationship between FGM secretion and population performance and biological costs when investigating effects of environmental and human-induced disturbances on wildlife. The crisis nature of many decisions in conservation biology often requires decisions from limited data; however, confirmatory results should not be posited when data are incomplete or confounding factors are not understood. Building reliable databases, and research with surrogate species when possible, will aid future efforts and enhance the utility of FGM assays.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Emerging Technologies to Conserve Biodiversity.

            Technologies to identify individual animals, follow their movements, identify and locate animal and plant species, and assess the status of their habitats remotely have become better, faster, and cheaper as threats to the survival of species are increasing. New technologies alone do not save species, and new data create new problems. For example, improving technologies alone cannot prevent poaching: solutions require providing appropriate tools to the right people. Habitat loss is another driver: the challenge here is to connect existing sophisticated remote sensing with species occurrence data to predict where species remain. Other challenges include assembling a wider public to crowdsource data, managing the massive quantities of data generated, and developing solutions to rapidly emerging threats.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Book: not found

              The African Wild Dog: Behavior, Ecology, and Conservation

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: Editor
                Journal
                PLoS One
                PLoS ONE
                plos
                plosone
                PLoS ONE
                Public Library of Science (San Francisco, CA USA )
                1932-6203
                8 March 2017
                2017
                : 12
                : 3
                : e0172065
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Nicholas School of the Environment, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, United States of America
                [2 ]JMP Division, SAS, Cary, North Carolina, United States of America
                [3 ]Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, United States of America
                [4 ]Texas Parks and Wildlife, Austin, Texas, United States of America
                U.S. Geological Survey, UNITED STATES
                Author notes

                Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

                • Conceptualization: SA ZJ.

                • Data curation: SA.

                • Formal analysis: SA.

                • Funding acquisition: ZJ JE.

                • Investigation: JE.

                • Methodology: SA ZJ JE.

                • Project administration: ZJ JE.

                • Resources: JE.

                • Software: SA ZJ.

                • Supervision: ZJ JE.

                • Validation: SA.

                • Visualization: SA.

                • Writing – original draft: ZJ JE.

                • Writing – review & editing: ZJ JE.

                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4915-7952
                Article
                PONE-D-16-41547
                10.1371/journal.pone.0172065
                5342180
                28273159
                7b4d5373-1f14-4981-ba6b-31d115000ff1

                This is an open access article, free of all copyright, and may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose. The work is made available under the Creative Commons CC0 public domain dedication.

                History
                : 18 October 2016
                : 30 January 2017
                Page count
                Figures: 11, Tables: 2, Pages: 22
                Funding
                The authors received no specific funding for this work.
                Categories
                Research Article
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Organisms
                Animals
                Vertebrates
                Amniotes
                Mammals
                Cats
                Pumas
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Molecular Biology
                Molecular Biology Techniques
                Genetic Fingerprinting and Footprinting
                Genetic Footprinting
                Research and Analysis Methods
                Molecular Biology Techniques
                Genetic Fingerprinting and Footprinting
                Genetic Footprinting
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Anatomy
                Musculoskeletal System
                Limbs (Anatomy)
                Legs
                Feet (Anatomy)
                Toes
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Anatomy
                Musculoskeletal System
                Limbs (Anatomy)
                Legs
                Feet (Anatomy)
                Toes
                Physical Sciences
                Mathematics
                Applied Mathematics
                Algorithms
                Research and Analysis Methods
                Simulation and Modeling
                Algorithms
                Physical Sciences
                Mathematics
                Geometry
                Ellipses
                Computer and Information Sciences
                Software Engineering
                Software Development
                Engineering and Technology
                Software Engineering
                Software Development
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Organisms
                Animals
                Vertebrates
                Amniotes
                Mammals
                Cats
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Organisms
                Animals
                Vertebrates
                Amniotes
                Mammals
                Dogs
                Custom metadata
                The dataset underlying this research is made available as an electronic file in the Supporting Information.

                Uncategorized
                Uncategorized

                Comments

                Comment on this article