85
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Rapid Acoustic Survey for Biodiversity Appraisal

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Biodiversity assessment remains one of the most difficult challenges encountered by ecologists and conservation biologists. This task is becoming even more urgent with the current increase of habitat loss. Many methods–from rapid biodiversity assessments (RBA) to all-taxa biodiversity inventories (ATBI)–have been developed for decades to estimate local species richness. However, these methods are costly and invasive. Several animals–birds, mammals, amphibians, fishes and arthropods–produce sounds when moving, communicating or sensing their environment. Here we propose a new concept and method to describe biodiversity. We suggest to forego species or morphospecies identification used by ATBI and RBA respectively but rather to tackle the problem at another evolutionary unit, the community level. We also propose that a part of diversity can be estimated and compared through a rapid acoustic analysis of the sound produced by animal communities. We produced α and β diversity indexes that we first tested with 540 simulated acoustic communities. The α index, which measures acoustic entropy, shows a logarithmic correlation with the number of species within the acoustic community. The β index, which estimates both temporal and spectral dissimilarities, is linearly linked to the number of unshared species between acoustic communities. We then applied both indexes to two closely spaced Tanzanian dry lowland coastal forests. Indexes reveal for this small sample a lower acoustic diversity for the most disturbed forest and acoustic dissimilarities between the two forests suggest that degradation could have significantly decreased and modified community composition. Our results demonstrate for the first time that an indicator of biological diversity can be reliably obtained in a non-invasive way and with a limited sampling effort. This new approach may facilitate the appraisal of animal diversity at large spatial and temporal scales.

          Related collections

          Most cited references80

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Book: not found

          R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            The future of biodiversity.

            Recent extinction rates are 100 to 1000 times their pre-human levels in well-known, but taxonomically diverse groups from widely different environments. If all species currently deemed "threatened" become extinct in the next century, then future extinction rates will be 10 times recent rates. Some threatened species will survive the century, but many species not now threatened will succumb. Regions rich in species found only within them (endemics) dominate the global patterns of extinction. Although new technology provides details of habitat losses, estimates of future extinctions are hampered by our limited knowledge of which areas are rich in endemics.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Measuring Biological Diversity

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: Editor
                Journal
                PLoS ONE
                plos
                plosone
                PLoS ONE
                Public Library of Science (San Francisco, USA )
                1932-6203
                2008
                30 December 2008
                : 3
                : 12
                : e4065
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Muséum national d'Histoire naturelle, Département Systématique et Évolution, UMR 5202 CNRS & USM 601 MNHN, CP 50, Paris, France
                [2 ]Mathematical Ecology Research Group, Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
                [3 ]Muséum national d'Histoire naturelle, Département Écologie et Gestion de la Biodiversité, UMR 5173 CNRS-UPMC & USM 305 MNHN, CP 51, Paris, France
                [4 ]Centre for Ecology and Hydrology, Crowmarsh Gifford, Wallingford, Oxfordshire, United Kingdom
                [5 ]IRD (Institut de Recherche pour le Développement), UR 200, IFRA, Nairobi, Kenya
                University of Sussex, United Kingdom
                Author notes

                Conceived and designed the experiments: JS SP OH SD. Performed the experiments: JS OH SD. Analyzed the data: JS SP. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: JS SP. Wrote the paper: JS SP OH SD.

                Article
                08-PONE-RA-06829R1
                10.1371/journal.pone.0004065
                2605254
                19115006
                7b9c73ca-6926-42b4-a827-3a8c67a9341b
                Sueur et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
                History
                : 7 October 2008
                : 26 November 2008
                Page count
                Pages: 9
                Categories
                Research Article
                Ecology/Community Ecology and Biodiversity
                Ecology/Conservation and Restoration Ecology
                Ecology/Evolutionary Ecology

                Uncategorized
                Uncategorized

                Comments

                Comment on this article