3
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Risk mitigation in algorithmic accountability: The role of machine learning copies

      research-article
      1 , 2 , * , 3 , 2
      PLoS ONE
      Public Library of Science

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Machine learning plays an increasingly important role in our society and economy and is already having an impact on our daily life in many different ways. From several perspectives, machine learning is seen as the new engine of productivity and economic growth. It can increase the business efficiency and improve any decision-making process, and of course, spawn the creation of new products and services by using complex machine learning algorithms. In this scenario, the lack of actionable accountability-related guidance is potentially the single most important challenge facing the machine learning community. Machine learning systems are often composed of many parts and ingredients, mixing third party components or software-as-a-service APIs, among others. In this paper we study the role of copies for risk mitigation in such machine learning systems. Formally, a copy can be regarded as an approximated projection operator of a model into a target model hypothesis set. Under the conceptual framework of actionable accountability, we explore the use of copies as a viable alternative in circumstances where models cannot be re-trained, nor enhanced by means of a wrapper. We use a real residential mortgage default dataset as a use case to illustrate the feasibility of this approach.

          Related collections

          Most cited references46

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Effects of computerized clinical decision support systems on practitioner performance and patient outcomes: a systematic review.

          Developers of health care software have attributed improvements in patient care to these applications. As with any health care intervention, such claims require confirmation in clinical trials. To review controlled trials assessing the effects of computerized clinical decision support systems (CDSSs) and to identify study characteristics predicting benefit. We updated our earlier reviews by searching the MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Inspec, and ISI databases and consulting reference lists through September 2004. Authors of 64 primary studies confirmed data or provided additional information. We included randomized and nonrandomized controlled trials that evaluated the effect of a CDSS compared with care provided without a CDSS on practitioner performance or patient outcomes. Teams of 2 reviewers independently abstracted data on methods, setting, CDSS and patient characteristics, and outcomes. One hundred studies met our inclusion criteria. The number and methodologic quality of studies improved over time. The CDSS improved practitioner performance in 62 (64%) of the 97 studies assessing this outcome, including 4 (40%) of 10 diagnostic systems, 16 (76%) of 21 reminder systems, 23 (62%) of 37 disease management systems, and 19 (66%) of 29 drug-dosing or prescribing systems. Fifty-two trials assessed 1 or more patient outcomes, of which 7 trials (13%) reported improvements. Improved practitioner performance was associated with CDSSs that automatically prompted users compared with requiring users to activate the system (success in 73% of trials vs 47%; P = .02) and studies in which the authors also developed the CDSS software compared with studies in which the authors were not the developers (74% success vs 28%; respectively, P = .001). Many CDSSs improve practitioner performance. To date, the effects on patient outcomes remain understudied and, when studied, inconsistent.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Genomics is failing on diversity.

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              A Survey of Methods for Explaining Black Box Models

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Data curationRole: Formal analysisRole: InvestigationRole: MethodologyRole: SoftwareRole: Writing – original draftRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: MethodologyRole: SupervisionRole: ValidationRole: Writing – original draftRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: MethodologyRole: SupervisionRole: ValidationRole: Writing – original draftRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: Editor
                Journal
                PLoS One
                PLoS One
                plos
                plosone
                PLoS ONE
                Public Library of Science (San Francisco, CA USA )
                1932-6203
                2020
                3 November 2020
                : 15
                : 11
                : e0241286
                Affiliations
                [1 ] BBVA Data & Analytics, Barcelona, Spain
                [2 ] Department of Mathematics and Computer Science, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
                [3 ] Department of Operations, Innovation and Data Sciences, Universitat Ramon Llull, ESADE, Barcelona, Spain
                Universiteit Maastricht, NETHERLANDS
                Author notes

                Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7422-1493
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7573-009X
                Article
                PONE-D-20-01977
                10.1371/journal.pone.0241286
                7608877
                33141844
                7b9e11bf-bf6f-41ac-8924-400579a66e2b
                © 2020 Unceta et al

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

                History
                : 30 January 2020
                : 13 October 2020
                Page count
                Figures: 6, Tables: 4, Pages: 26
                Funding
                The author(s) received no specific funding for this work.
                Categories
                Research Article
                Engineering and Technology
                Management Engineering
                Decision Analysis
                Decision Trees
                Research and Analysis Methods
                Decision Analysis
                Decision Trees
                Computer and Information Sciences
                Artificial Intelligence
                Machine Learning
                Social Sciences
                Economics
                Finance
                Public Finance
                Money Supply and Banking
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Epidemiology
                Medical Risk Factors
                Social Sciences
                Economics
                Finance
                Physical Sciences
                Mathematics
                Applied Mathematics
                Algorithms
                Machine Learning Algorithms
                Research and Analysis Methods
                Simulation and Modeling
                Algorithms
                Machine Learning Algorithms
                Computer and Information Sciences
                Artificial Intelligence
                Machine Learning
                Machine Learning Algorithms
                Social Sciences
                Law and Legal Sciences
                Regulations
                Social Sciences
                Sociology
                Education
                Training (Education)
                Retraining
                Custom metadata
                All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.

                Uncategorized
                Uncategorized

                Comments

                Comment on this article