3
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
6 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Assessing the efficiency of countries in making progress towards universal health coverage: a data envelopment analysis of 172 countries

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Introduction

          Maximising efficiency of resources is critical to progressing towards universal health coverage (UHC) and the sustainable development goal (SDG) for health. This study estimates the technical efficiency of national health spending in progressing towards UHC, and the environmental factors associated with efficient UHC service provision.

          Methods

          A two-stage efficiency analysis using Simar and Wilson’s double bootstrap data envelopment analysis investigates how efficiently countries convert health spending into UHC outputs (measured by service coverage and financial risk protection) for 172 countries. We use World Bank and WHO data from 2015. Thereafter, the environmental factors associated with efficient progress towards UHC goals are identified.

          Results

          The mean bias-corrected technical efficiency score across 172 countries is 85.7% (68.9% for low-income and 95.5% for high-income countries). High-achieving middle-income and low-income countries such as El Salvador, Colombia, Rwanda and Malawi demonstrate that peer-relative efficiency can be attained at all incomes. Governance capacity, income and education are significantly associated with efficiency. Sensitivity analysis suggests that results are robust to changes.

          Conclusion

          We provide a 2015 baseline for cross-country UHC technical efficiency scores. If countries wish to improve their UHC outputs within existing budgets, they should identify their current efficiency and try to emulate more efficient peers. Policy-makers should focus on strengthening institutions and implementing known best practices to replicate efficient systems. Using resources more efficiently is likely to positively impact UHC coverage goals and health outcomes, and without addressing gaps in efficiency progress towards achieving the SDGs will be impeded.

          Related collections

          Most cited references50

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Estimation and inference in two-stage, semi-parametric models of production processes

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Book Chapter: not found

            Chapter 6 Institutions as a Fundamental Cause of Long-Run Growth

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Progress on catastrophic health spending in 133 countries: a retrospective observational study

              The goal of universal health coverage (UHC) requires inter alia that families who get needed health care do not suffer undue financial hardship as a result. This can be measured by the percentage of people in households whose out-of-pocket health expenditures are large relative to their income or consumption. We aimed to estimate the global incidence of catastrophic health spending, trends between 2000 and 2010, and associations between catastrophic health spending and macroeconomic and health system variables at the country level.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                BMJ Glob Health
                BMJ Glob Health
                bmjgh
                bmjgh
                BMJ Global Health
                BMJ Publishing Group (BMA House, Tavistock Square, London, WC1H 9JR )
                2059-7908
                2020
                28 October 2020
                : 5
                : 10
                : e002992
                Affiliations
                [1 ]departmentInstitute for Global Health , University College London , London, UK
                [2 ]departmentSchool of Clinical Medicine , University of Cambridge , Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, UK
                [3 ]departmentHealth Financing and Governance , World Health Organization , Geneva, Switzerland
                Author notes
                [Correspondence to ] Dr Hassan Haghparast-Bidgoli; h.haghparast-bidgoli@ 123456ucl.ac.uk
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6022-3036
                Article
                bmjgh-2020-002992
                10.1136/bmjgh-2020-002992
                7594203
                33115858
                7bace64c-4d51-49c4-b1a5-5e291e7c5dbb
                © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

                This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See:  http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.

                History
                : 24 May 2020
                : 06 September 2020
                : 28 September 2020
                Categories
                Original Research
                1506
                Custom metadata
                unlocked

                health economics,health systems,health systems evaluation,other study design

                Comments

                Comment on this article