10
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Overflow in science and its implications for trust

      discussion

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          To explore increasing concerns about scientific misconduct and data irreproducibility in some areas of science, we interviewed a number of senior biomedical researchers. These interviews revealed a perceived decline in trust in the scientific enterprise, in large part because the quantity of new data exceeds the field's ability to process it appropriately. This phenomenon—which is termed ‘overflow’ in social science—has important implications for the integrity of modern biomedical science.

          Related collections

          Most cited references29

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          The history and meaning of the journal impact factor.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research.

            P O Seglen (1997)
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Why Current Publication Practices May Distort Science

              John Ioannidis and colleagues argue that the current system of publication in biomedical research provides a distorted view of the reality of scientific data.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                eLife
                eLife
                eLife
                eLife
                eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd
                2050-084X
                2050-084X
                14 September 2015
                2015
                : 4
                : e10825
                Affiliations
                [1]deptAdam Smith Business School , University of Glasgow , Glasgow, United Kingdom
                [2]deptCRUK Beatson Institute for Cancer Research , University of Glasgow , Glasgow, United Kingdom and deptCollege of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences , University of Glasgow , Glasgow, United Kingdom
                [3]deptCRUK Beatson Institute for Cancer Research , University of Glasgow , Glasgow, United Kingdom and deptCollege of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences , University of Glasgow , Glasgow, United Kingdom R.Insall@ 123456beatson.gla.ac.uk
                Article
                10825
                10.7554/eLife.10825
                4563216
                26365552
                7bc6ac24-8a2f-45c2-8785-1871e566bf72
                © 2015, Siebert et al

                This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

                History
                Categories
                Feature Article
                Point of View
                Custom metadata
                2.3

                Life sciences
                point of view,reproducibility,overflow,trust in science,scientific conduct
                Life sciences
                point of view, reproducibility, overflow, trust in science, scientific conduct

                Comments

                Comment on this article