9
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Improved preoperative risk stratification with CA-125 in low-grade endometrial cancer: a multicenter prospective cohort study

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Objectives

          The global obesity epidemic has great impact on the prevalence of low-grade endometrial carcinoma. The preoperative tumor serum marker cancer antigen 125 (CA-125) might contribute to improved identification of high-risk patients within this group. The study aimed to investigate the prognostic value of CA-125 in relation to established preoperative prognosticators, with a focus on identifying patients with poor outcome in low-grade endometrial carcinoma (EC) patients.

          Methods

          Prospective multicenter cohort study including all consecutive patients surgically treated for endometrial carcinoma in nine collaborating hospitals from September 2011 until December 2013. All preoperative histopathological diagnoses were reviewed in a blinded manner. Associations between CA-125 and clinicopathological features were determined. Univariable and multivariable analysis by Cox regression were used. Separate analyses were performed for preoperatively designated low-grade and high-grade endometrial carcinoma patients.

          Results

          A total of 333 patients were analyzed. CA-125 was associated with poor prognostic features including advanced International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage. In multivariable analysis, age, preoperative tumor and CA-125 were significantly associated with disease-free survival (DFS); preoperative grade, tumor type, FIGO and CA-125 were significantly associated with disease-specific survival (DSS). Low-grade EC patients with elevated CA-125 revealed a DFS of 80.6% and DSS of 87.1%, compared to 92.1% and 97.2% in low-grade EC patients with normal CA-125.

          Conclusion

          Preoperative elevated CA-125 was associated with poor prognostic features and independently associated with DFS and DSS. Particularly patients with low-grade EC and elevated CA-125 represent a group with poor outcome and should be considered as high-risk endometrial carcinoma.

          Related collections

          Most cited references30

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Surgical pathologic spread patterns of endometrial cancer. A Gynecologic Oncology Group Study.

          The surgical pathologic features of 621 patients with Stage I carcinoma of the endometrium are presented. All patients were treated with primary surgery consisting of total abdominal hysterectomy, bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, selective pelvic and paraaortic lymphadenectomy and peritoneal cytology. An appreciable number of patients (144-22%) with Stage I cancers have disease outside of the uterus (lymph node metastasis, adnexal disease, intraperitoneal spread and/or malignant cells in peritoneal washings). Multiple prognostic factors particularly grade and depth of invasion are related to extrauterine disease. This study adds credence to the primary surgical approach with individualized postoperative therapy as indicated.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Endometrial cancer: a review and current management strategies: part I.

            Endometrial carcinoma is the most common gynecologic malignancy. A thorough understanding of the epidemiology, pathophysiology, and management strategies for this cancer allows the obstetrician-gynecologist to identify women at increased risk, contribute toward risk reduction, and facilitate early diagnosis. The Society of Gynecologic Oncology's Clinical Practice Committee has reviewed the literature and created evidence-based practice recommendations for diagnosis and treatment. This article examines: • Risk factors, including genetic predisposition • Diagnostic and metastatic evaluation • Surgical management of early and advanced cancer, including lymphadenectomy in early cancer.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found
              Is Open Access

              ESMO-ESGO-ESTRO consensus conference on endometrial cancer: Diagnosis, treatment and follow-up.

              The first joint European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO), European SocieTy for Radiotherapy & Oncology (ESTRO) and European Society of Gynaecological Oncology (ESGO) consensus conference on endometrial cancer was held on 11-13 December 2014 in Milan, Italy, and comprised a multidisciplinary panel of 40 leading experts in the management of endometrial cancer. Before the conference, the expert panel prepared three clinically-relevant questions about endometrial cancer relating to the following four areas: Prevention and screening, surgery, adjuvant treatment and advanced and recurrent disease. All relevant scientific literature, as identified by the experts, was reviewed in advance. During the consensus conference, the panel developed recommendations for each specific question and a consensus was reached. Results of this consensus conference, together with a summary of evidence supporting each recommendation, are detailed in this article. All participants have approved this final article.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                J Gynecol Oncol
                J Gynecol Oncol
                JGO
                Journal of Gynecologic Oncology
                Asian Society of Gynecologic Oncology; Korean Society of Gynecologic Oncology
                2005-0380
                2005-0399
                September 2019
                14 March 2019
                : 30
                : 5
                : e70
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
                [2 ]Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Canisius-Wilhelmina Hospital, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
                [3 ]Department of Pathology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
                [4 ]Centre of Gynaecologic Oncology Amsterdam, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
                [5 ]Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
                [6 ]Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Màxima Medical Centre, Veldhoven, The Netherlands.
                [7 ]Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Elkerliek Hospital, Helmond, The Netherlands.
                [8 ]Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Amphia Hospital, Breda, The Netherlands.
                [9 ]Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Jeroen Bosch Hospital, 's-Hertogenbosch, The Netherlands.
                [10 ]Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Elisabeth-Tweesteden Hospital, Tilburg, The Netherlands.
                Author notes
                Correspondence to Casper Reijnen. Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Radboud University Medical Center, Geert Grooteplein 10, 6525 GA, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. Casper.reijnen@ 123456radboudumc.nl
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6873-7832
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3919-3922
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9631-1422
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5339-8505
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1951-1076
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6206-1624
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5928-3269
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1449-3726
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1612-0395
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8168-6045
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2434-7442
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1539-8985
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6138-1236
                Article
                2019300509
                10.3802/jgo.2019.30.e70
                6658593
                31328454
                7bdfa114-b1f3-409b-9c8d-66c34ffd04cc
                Copyright © 2019. Asian Society of Gynecologic Oncology, Korean Society of Gynecologic Oncology

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 02 January 2019
                : 30 January 2019
                : 24 February 2019
                Categories
                Original Article
                Uterine Corpus

                Oncology & Radiotherapy
                ca-125 antigen,endometrial neoplasms,low-grade carcinoma,biomarkers,risk stratification

                Comments

                Comment on this article