4
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      New insights into the formation and emplacement of impact melt rocks within the Chicxulub impact structure, following the 2016 IODP-ICDP Expedition 364

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          This study presents petrographic and geochemical characterization of 46 pre-impact rocks and 32 impactites containing and/or representing impact melt rock from the peak ring of the Chicxulub impact structure (Yucatán, Mexico). The aims were both to investigate the components that potentially contributed to the impact melt (i.e., the pre-impact lithologies) and to better elucidate impact melt rock emplacement at Chicxulub. The impactites presented here are subdivided into two sample groups: the lower impact melt rock–bearing unit, which intrudes the peak ring at different intervals, and the upper impact melt rock unit, which overlies the peak ring. The geochemical characterization of five identified pre-impact lithologies (i.e., granitoid, dolerite, dacite, felsite, and limestone) was able to constrain the bulk geochemical composition of both impactite units. These pre-impact lithologies thus likely represent the main constituent lithologies that were involved in the formation of impact melt rock. In general, the composition of both impactite units can be explained by mixing of the primarily felsic and mafic lithologies, but with varying degrees of carbonate dilution. It is assumed that the two units were initially part of the same impact-produced melt, but discrete processes separated them during crater formation. The lower impact melt rock–bearing unit is interpreted to represent impact melt rock injected into the crystalline basement during the compression/excavation stage of cratering. These impact melt rock layers acted as delamination surfaces within the crystalline basement, accommodating its displacement during peak ring formation. This movement strongly comminuted the impact melt rock layers present in the peak ring structure. The composition of the upper impact melt rock unit was contingent on the entrainment of carbonate components and is interpreted to have stayed at the surface during crater development. Its formation was not finalized until the modification stage, when carbonate material would have reentered the crater.

          Related collections

          Most cited references87

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Chemical and isotopic systematics of oceanic basalts: implications for mantle composition and processes

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Trace Element Discrimination Diagrams for the Tectonic Interpretation of Granitic Rocks

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              The Chicxulub asteroid impact and mass extinction at the Cretaceous-Paleogene boundary.

              The Cretaceous-Paleogene boundary approximately 65.5 million years ago marks one of the three largest mass extinctions in the past 500 million years. The extinction event coincided with a large asteroid impact at Chicxulub, Mexico, and occurred within the time of Deccan flood basalt volcanism in India. Here, we synthesize records of the global stratigraphy across this boundary to assess the proposed causes of the mass extinction. Notably, a single ejecta-rich deposit compositionally linked to the Chicxulub impact is globally distributed at the Cretaceous-Paleogene boundary. The temporal match between the ejecta layer and the onset of the extinctions and the agreement of ecological patterns in the fossil record with modeled environmental perturbations (for example, darkness and cooling) lead us to conclude that the Chicxulub impact triggered the mass extinction.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                (View ORCID Profile)
                Journal
                GSA Bulletin
                Geological Society of America
                0016-7606
                1943-2674
                May 07 2021
                January 01 2022
                May 07 2021
                January 01 2022
                : 134
                : 1-2
                : 293-315
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Analytical, Environmental & Geo-Chemistry Research Unit, Department of Chemistry, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, AMGC-WE-VUB, Pleinlaan 2, 1050 Brussels, Belgium
                [2 ]Laboratoire G-Time, Université Libre de Bruxelles, ULB, Avenue F.D. Roosevelt 50, 1050 Brussels, Belgium
                [3 ]Institute for Geophysics & Department of Geological Sciences, Jackson School of Geosciences, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas 78758, USA
                [4 ]Center for Planetary Systems Habitability, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas 78712, USA
                [5 ]Department of Lithospheric Research, University of Vienna, Althanstrasse 14, A-1090 Vienna, Austria
                [6 ]Natural History Museum, Burgring 7, A-1010 Vienna, Austria
                [7 ]Department of Earth Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1085, 1081 HV Amsterdam, Netherlands
                Article
                10.1130/B35795.1
                7be588ce-3bc5-4a22-866b-392581793d28
                © 2022
                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article