1
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Iodoacetic acid inhibits follicle growth and alters expression of genes that regulate apoptosis, the cell cycle, estrogen receptors, and ovarian steroidogenesis in mouse ovarian follicles

      , , , ,
      Reproductive Toxicology
      Elsevier BV

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The reactions between disinfectants and organic matter or inorganic matter in source water generates disinfection by-products (DBPs) such as iodoacetic acid (IAA). DBPs are associated with health effects such as bladder cancer and adverse reproductive outcomes, but the effects of IAA on the ovary are not well known. This study determined whether IAA exposure affects ovarian follicle growth, steroidogenesis, and expression of apoptotic factors, cell cycle regulators, estrogen receptors, and steroidogenic factors in vitro . IAA exposure significantly decreased follicle growth, expression of cell cycle stimulators, and the proliferation marker Ki67 . In contrast, IAA increased expression of the cell cycle inhibitor Cdkn1a . Moreover, IAA exposure increased expression of pro-apoptotic factors, whereas it decreased expression of anti-apoptotic factors. IAA exposure also altered expression of steroidogenic factors and estrogen receptors, disrupting steroidogenesis. These data demonstrate that IAA exposure inhibits follicle growth, decreases cell proliferation, and alters steroidogenesis in mouse ovarian follicles in vitro .

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          Reproductive Toxicology
          Reproductive Toxicology
          Elsevier BV
          08906238
          January 2020
          January 2020
          : 91
          : 101-108
          Article
          10.1016/j.reprotox.2019.10.005
          6980769
          31693920
          7bfaac55-7a89-4312-9399-c585ecc1ed6c
          © 2020

          https://www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/

          History

          Comments

          Comment on this article