25
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Differences in TCDD-elicited gene expression profiles in human HepG2, mouse Hepa1c1c7 and rat H4IIE hepatoma cells

      research-article
      1 , 1 , 1 , 2 , 1 , 2 ,
      BMC Genomics
      BioMed Central

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          2,3,7,8-Tetrachlorodibenzo- p-dioxin (TCDD) is an environmental contaminant that elicits a broad spectrum of toxic effects in a species-specific manner. Current risk assessment practices routinely extrapolate results from in vivo and in vitro rodent models to assess human risk. In order to further investigate the species-specific responses elicited by TCDD, temporal gene expression responses in human HepG2, mouse Hepa1c1c7 and rat H4IIE cells were compared.

          Results

          Microarray analysis identified a core set of conserved gene expression responses across species consistent with the role of AhR in mediating adaptive metabolic responses. However, significant species-specific as well as species-divergent responses were identified. Computational analysis of the regulatory regions of species-specific and -divergent responses suggests that dioxin response elements (DREs) are involved. These results are consistent with in vivo rat vs. mouse species-specific differential gene expression, and more comprehensive comparative DRE searches.

          Conclusions

          Comparative analysis of human HepG2, mouse Hepa1c1c7 and rat H4IIE TCDD-elicited gene expression responses is consistent with in vivo rat-mouse comparative gene expression studies, and more comprehensive comparative DRE searches, suggesting that AhR-mediated gene expression is species-specific.

          Related collections

          Most cited references32

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The aryl hydrocarbon receptor complex.

          The heteromeric unliganded aryl hydrocarbon receptor complex (AHRC) contains the aryl hydrocarbon receptor monomer (AHR). Binding of polycyclic or halogenated aromatic hydrocarbon (PAH and HAH) ligand causes release of AHR, which then associates with the AHR nuclear translocator protein (ARNT) to generate the heterodimeric "transformed" AHRC. AHR and ARNT belong to a novel subclass of basic helix-loop-helix-containing transcription factors. The transformed AHRC binds xenobiotic responsive elements in responsive genes and turns on their transcription. Certain of these genes encode enzymes involved in the metabolic activation of PAHs to mutagenic derivatives. HAHs are not genotoxic: Their pathogenicity depends on the AHRC but not on their metabolism. Current research includes investigations directed towards delineating the pathways of HAH pathogenesis, ascertaining whether AHR can mediate signal transduction independently of DNA binding, understanding the mechanism of transcriptional activation, and investigating the potential roles of AHR and ARNT in development.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Role of the aromatic hydrocarbon receptor and [Ah] gene battery in the oxidative stress response, cell cycle control, and apoptosis.

            The chronology and history of characterizing the aromatic hydrocarbon [Ah] battery is reviewed. This battery represents the Ah receptor (AHR)-mediated control of at least six, and probably many more, dioxin-inducible genes; two cytochrome P450 genes-P450 1A1 and 1A2 (Cypla1, Cypla2-and four non-P450 genes, have experimentally been documented to be members of this battery. Metabolism of endogenous and exogenous substrates by perhaps every P450 enzyme, but certainly CYP1A1 and CYP1A2 (which are located, in part, in the mitochondrion), have been shown to cause reactive oxygenated metabolite (ROM)-mediated oxidative stress. Oxidative stress activates genes via the electrophile response element (EPRE) DNA motif, whereas dioxin (acutely) activates genes via the AHR-mediated aromatic hydrocarbon response element (AHRE) DNA motif. In contrast to dioxin, AHR ligands that are readily metabolized to ROMs (e.g. benzo[a]pyrene, beta-naphthoflavone) activate genes via both AHREs and the EPRE. The importance of the AHR in cell cycle regulation and apoptosis has just begun to be realized. Current evidence suggests that the CYP1A1 and CYP1A2 enzymes might control the level of the putative endogenous ligand of the AHR, but that CYPA1/1A2 metabolism generates ROM-mediated oxidative stress which can be ameliorated by the four non-P450 EPRE-driven genes in the [Ah] battery. Oxidative stress is a major signal in precipitating apoptosis; however, the precise mechanism, or molecule, which determines the cell's decision between apoptosis and continuation with the cell cycle, remains to be elucidated. The total action of AHR and the [Ah] battery genes therefore represents a pivotal upstream event in the apoptosis cascade, providing an intricate balance between promoting and preventing ROM-mediated oxidative stress. These proposed endogenous functions of the AHR and [Ah] enzymes are, of course, in addition to the frequently described functions of "metabolic potentiation" and "detoxification" of various foreign chemicals.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Design issues for cDNA microarray experiments.

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                BMC Genomics
                BMC Genomics
                BioMed Central
                1471-2164
                2011
                15 April 2011
                : 12
                : 193
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Biochemistry & Molecular Biology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, 48824, USA
                [2 ]Center for Integrative Toxicology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA
                Article
                1471-2164-12-193
                10.1186/1471-2164-12-193
                3089798
                21496263
                7c07157c-83e0-497b-8e80-315a5f97c950
                Copyright ©2011 Dere et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 2 June 2010
                : 15 April 2011
                Categories
                Research Article

                Genetics
                Genetics

                Comments

                Comment on this article