5
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Attentional Bias to Facial Expressions of Different Emotions – A Cross-Cultural Comparison of ≠Akhoe Hai||om and German Children and Adolescents

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The attentional bias to negative information enables humans to quickly identify and to respond appropriately to potentially threatening situations. Because of its adaptive function, the enhanced sensitivity to negative information is expected to represent a universal trait, shared by all humans regardless of their cultural background. However, existing research focuses almost exclusively on humans from Western industrialized societies, who are not representative for the human species. Therefore, we compare humans from two distinct cultural contexts: adolescents and children from Germany, a Western industrialized society, and from the ≠Akhoe Hai||om, semi-nomadic hunter-gatherers in Namibia. We predicted that both groups show an attentional bias toward negative facial expressions as compared to neutral or positive faces. We used eye-tracking to measure their fixation duration on facial expressions depicting different emotions, including negative (fear, anger), positive (happy), and neutral faces. Both Germans and the ≠Akhoe Hai||om gazed longer at fearful faces, but shorter on angry faces, challenging the notion of a general bias toward negative emotions. For happy faces, fixation durations varied between the two groups, suggesting more flexibility in the response to positive emotions. Our findings emphasize the need for placing research on emotion perception into an evolutionary, cross-cultural comparative framework that considers the adaptive significance of specific emotions, rather than differentiating between positive and negative information, and enables systematic comparisons across participants from diverse cultural backgrounds.

          Related collections

          Most cited references33

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Bad is stronger than good.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            On the universality and cultural specificity of emotion recognition: a meta-analysis.

            A meta-analysis examined emotion recognition within and across cultures. Emotions were universally recognized at better-than-chance levels. Accuracy was higher when emotions were both expressed and recognized by members of the same national, ethnic, or regional group, suggesting an in-group advantage. This advantage was smaller for cultural groups with greater exposure to one another, measured in terms of living in the same nation, physical proximity, and telephone communication. Majority group members were poorer at judging minority group members than the reverse. Cross-cultural accuracy was lower in studies that used a balanced research design, and higher in studies that used imitation rather than posed or spontaneous emotional expressions. Attributes of study design appeared not to moderate the size of the in-group advantage.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              The face in the crowd revisited: a threat advantage with schematic stimuli.

              Schematic threatening, friendly, and neutral faces were used to test the hypothesis that humans preferentially orient their attention toward threat. Using a visual search paradigm, participants searched for discrepant faces in matrices of otherwise identical faces. Across 5 experiments, results consistently showed faster and more accurate detection of threatening than friendly targets. The threat advantage was obvious regardless of whether the conditions favored parallel or serial search (i.e., involved neutral or emotional distractors), and it was valid for inverted faces. Threatening angry faces were more quickly and accurately detected than were other negative faces (sad or "scheming"), which suggests that the threat advantage can be attributed to threat rather than to the negative valence or the uniqueness of the target display.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Front Psychol
                Front Psychol
                Front. Psychol.
                Frontiers in Psychology
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                1664-1078
                28 April 2020
                2020
                : 11
                : 795
                Affiliations
                [1] 1Department of Psychology, Brandenburg Medical School Theodor Fontane , Neuruppin, Germany
                [2] 2Comparative Developmental Psychology, Department of Education and Psychology, Freie Universität Berlin , Berlin, Germany
                [3] 3Graduate School “Languages of Emotion”, Freie Universität Berlin , Berlin, Germany
                [4] 4Department of Linguistics, Cognitive Sciences, University of Potsdam , Potsdam, Germany
                Author notes

                Edited by: Katja Koelkebeck, LVR Hospital Essen, Germany

                Reviewed by: Mariska Esther Kret, Leiden University, Netherlands; Thomas Suslow, Leipzig University, Germany

                *Correspondence: Katja Liebal, katja.liebal@ 123456fu-berlin.de

                These authors share first authorship

                This article was submitted to Emotion Science, a section of the journal Frontiers in Psychology

                Article
                10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00795
                7199105
                32411056
                7c5ad996-a5e3-4e85-9eba-9ad0b8cd8968
                Copyright © 2020 Mühlenbeck, Pritsch, Wartenburger, Telkemeyer and Liebal.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 19 December 2019
                : 31 March 2020
                Page count
                Figures: 2, Tables: 2, Equations: 0, References: 50, Pages: 9, Words: 0
                Funding
                Funded by: Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft 10.13039/501100001659
                Categories
                Psychology
                Brief Research Report

                Clinical Psychology & Psychiatry
                attentional bias,fear bias,emotions,facial expressions,cross-cultural comparison,≠akhoe hai||om,germans,adolescents

                Comments

                Comment on this article