An Evaluation of ECG Leads Used to Assess QT Prolongation

Abstract

Aims: The aim of the present study is to elucidate the optimal lead to be selected for the evaluation of drug-induced QT prolongation. Methods and Results: We assessed the validity of each electrocardiography (ECG) lead for the evaluation of QT intervals in 688 patients receiving psychotropic drugs. Abnormal QTc prolongation was observed in 96 (14%) patients using the longest ECG lead. Prevalence of QTc prolongation was larger when using leads I, III, aVR, aVL, aVF, V1, and V6 (>18%), and smaller when using lead V2 (10%). In the remaining 4 ECG leads, the overall accuracy to predict QTc prolongation was higher when using lead V3 (94%) compared with lead II (89%) or lead V5 (90%). Sensitivity to predict QTc prolongation was higher when using lead V4 (81%) compared with lead II (66%) or lead V2 (63%). Conclusion: When a single lead was used for the evaluation of QT prolongation, the results were not always similar to those using the lead which demonstrated the longest QT interval, and if only one lead is to be chosen, lead V3 or V4 should be selected.

Journal

Journal ID (publisher-id): CRD

Journal ID (nlm-ta): Cardiology

Journal ID (doi): 10.1159/issn.0008-6312

Title: Cardiology

Publisher: S. Karger AG

ISSN (Print): 0008-6312

ISSN (Electronic): 1421-9751

Publication date Subscription-year: 2006

Publication date (Print): March 2006

Publication date (Electronic): 03 April 2006

Volume: 105

Issue: 3

Pages: 149-154

Affiliations

Department of Medicine and Clinical Science, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan

Article

Publisher ID: 91227 Other ID: Cardiology 2006;105:149–154

DOI: 10.1159/000091227

PubMed ID: 16449814

Copyright statement: © 2006 S. Karger AG, Basel

License:

Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug. Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.

Page count

Figures: 2, Tables: 3, References: 16, Pages: 6

Product

Self URI (application/pdf): https://www.karger.com/Article/Pdf/91227

Self URI (text/html): https://www.karger.com/Article/FullText/91227

Self URI (journal page): https://www.karger.com/SubjectArea/Cardiovascular-System

Categories

Subject: Original Research