23
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Canadian 24-Hour Movement Guidelines for the Early Years (0–4 years): An Integration of Physical Activity, Sedentary Behaviour, and Sleep

      research-article
      1 , ,   1 , 2 , 1 , 1 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 1 , 1 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 1 , 15 , 9 , 1 , 16 , 11 , 17 , 11
      BMC Public Health
      BioMed Central
      Infants, Toddlers, Preschoolers, Adiposity, Motor development, Cognitive development, Public health, Recommendations, Guideline development

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          The Canadian Society for Exercise Physiology convened representatives of national organizations, research experts, methodologists, stakeholders, and end-users who followed rigorous and transparent guideline development procedures to create the Canadian 24-Hour Movement Guidelines for the Early Years (0–4 years): An Integration of Physical Activity, Sedentary Behaviour, and Sleep . These novel guidelines for children of the early years embrace the natural and intuitive integration of movement behaviours across the whole day (24-h period).

          Methods

          The development process was guided by the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE) II instrument. Four systematic reviews (physical activity, sedentary behaviour, sleep, combined behaviours) examining the relationships within and among movement behaviours and several health indicators were completed and interpreted by a Guideline Development Panel. The systematic reviews that were conducted to inform the development of the guidelines, and the framework that was applied to develop the recommendations, followed the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology. Complementary compositional analyses were performed using data from the Canadian Health Measures Survey to examine the relationships between movement behaviours and indicators of adiposity. A review of the evidence on the cost effectiveness and resource use associated with the implementation of the proposed guidelines was also undertaken. A stakeholder survey ( n = 546), 10 key informant interviews, and 14 focus groups ( n = 92 participants) were completed to gather feedback on draft guidelines and their dissemination.

          Results

          The guidelines provide evidence-informed recommendations as to the combinations of light-, moderate- and vigorous-intensity physical activity, sedentary behaviours, and sleep that infants (<1 year), toddlers (1–2 years) and preschoolers (3–4 years) should achieve for a healthy day (24 h). Proactive dissemination, promotion, implementation, and evaluation plans were prepared to optimize uptake and activation of the new guidelines.

          Conclusions

          These guidelines represent a sensible evolution of public health guidelines whereby optimal health is framed within the balance of movement behaviours across the whole day, while respecting preferences of end-users. Future research should consider the integrated relationships among movement behaviours, and similar integrated guidelines for other age groups should be developed.

          Electronic supplementary material

          The online version of this article (10.1186/s12889-017-4859-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

          Related collections

          Most cited references64

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Research electronic data capture (REDCap)--a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support.

          Research electronic data capture (REDCap) is a novel workflow methodology and software solution designed for rapid development and deployment of electronic data capture tools to support clinical and translational research. We present: (1) a brief description of the REDCap metadata-driven software toolset; (2) detail concerning the capture and use of study-related metadata from scientific research teams; (3) measures of impact for REDCap; (4) details concerning a consortium network of domestic and international institutions collaborating on the project; and (5) strengths and limitations of the REDCap system. REDCap is currently supporting 286 translational research projects in a growing collaborative network including 27 active partner institutions.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            GRADE guidelines: 1. Introduction-GRADE evidence profiles and summary of findings tables.

            This article is the first of a series providing guidance for use of the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) system of rating quality of evidence and grading strength of recommendations in systematic reviews, health technology assessments (HTAs), and clinical practice guidelines addressing alternative management options. The GRADE process begins with asking an explicit question, including specification of all important outcomes. After the evidence is collected and summarized, GRADE provides explicit criteria for rating the quality of evidence that include study design, risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency, indirectness, and magnitude of effect. Recommendations are characterized as strong or weak (alternative terms conditional or discretionary) according to the quality of the supporting evidence and the balance between desirable and undesirable consequences of the alternative management options. GRADE suggests summarizing evidence in succinct, transparent, and informative summary of findings tables that show the quality of evidence and the magnitude of relative and absolute effects for each important outcome and/or as evidence profiles that provide, in addition, detailed information about the reason for the quality of evidence rating. Subsequent articles in this series will address GRADE's approach to formulating questions, assessing quality of evidence, and developing recommendations. Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              GRADE guidelines: 3. Rating the quality of evidence.

              This article introduces the approach of GRADE to rating quality of evidence. GRADE specifies four categories-high, moderate, low, and very low-that are applied to a body of evidence, not to individual studies. In the context of a systematic review, quality reflects our confidence that the estimates of the effect are correct. In the context of recommendations, quality reflects our confidence that the effect estimates are adequate to support a particular recommendation. Randomized trials begin as high-quality evidence, observational studies as low quality. "Quality" as used in GRADE means more than risk of bias and so may also be compromised by imprecision, inconsistency, indirectness of study results, and publication bias. In addition, several factors can increase our confidence in an estimate of effect. GRADE provides a systematic approach for considering and reporting each of these factors. GRADE separates the process of assessing quality of evidence from the process of making recommendations. Judgments about the strength of a recommendation depend on more than just the quality of evidence. Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                (613) 737-7600 , mtremblay@cheo.on.ca
                jpchaput@cheo.on.ca
                kristi.adamo@uottawa.ca
                saubert@cheo.on.ca
                jbarnes@cheo.on.ca
                l.choquette@healthnexus.ca
                mduggan@csep.ca
                guy.faulkner@ubc.ca
                ggoldfield@cheo.on.ca
                casgray@cheo.on.ca
                reut.gruber@douglas.umcgill.ca
                kjanson@participaction.com
                ian.janssen@queensu.ca
                xanne.janssen@strath.ac.uk
                alejandra.jaramillogarcia@phac-aspc.gc.ca
                nkuzik@ualberta.ca
                claire.leblanc@muhc.mcgill.ca
                joanna.maclean@ualberta.ca
                tokely@uow.edu.au
                veronicapoitras@gmail.com
                meraynor@sandboxproject.ca
                john.j.reilly@strath.ac.uk
                msampson@cheo.on.ca
                jc.spence@ualberta.ca
                timmonbw@mcmaster.ca
                vlcarson@ualberta.ca
                Journal
                BMC Public Health
                BMC Public Health
                BMC Public Health
                BioMed Central (London )
                1471-2458
                20 November 2017
                20 November 2017
                2017
                : 17
                Issue : Suppl 5 Issue sponsor : Publication of this supplement has not been supported by sponsorship. Information about the source of funding for publication charges can be found in the individual articles. The articles have undergone the journal's standard peer review process for supplements. The supplement editor declares the following: I publish and serve as a co-investigator on research grants with Dr. Brian Timmons. I have previously published one paper with Dr. Catherine Birken. Drs. Valerie Carson and Kristi Adamo are my co-applicants on a grant submission currently under review as of the publication date of this supplement. I have no financial competing interests to declare.
                : 874
                Affiliations
                [1 ]ISNI 0000 0000 9402 6172, GRID grid.414148.c, Healthy Active Living and Obesity Research Group, , Children’s Hospital of Eastern Ontario Research Institute, ; 401 Smyth Road, Ottawa, ON K1H 8L1 Canada
                [2 ]ISNI 0000 0001 2182 2255, GRID grid.28046.38, School of Human Kinetics, Faculty of Health Sciences, , University of Ottawa, ; Ottawa, ON K1N 1A2 Canada
                [3 ]Best Start Resource Centre, Health Nexus, Toronto, ON M5G 1Z8 Canada
                [4 ]ISNI 0000 0001 0682 1940, GRID grid.432751.6, Canadian Society for Exercise Physiology, ; Ottawa, ON K1R 6Y6 Canada
                [5 ]ISNI 0000 0001 2288 9830, GRID grid.17091.3e, School of Kinesiology, , University of British Columbia, ; Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z3 Canada
                [6 ]ISNI 0000 0004 1936 8649, GRID grid.14709.3b, Department of Psychiatry, , Faculty of Medicine, McGill University, ; Montreal, QC H3A 1A1 Canada
                [7 ]ParticipACTION, Toronto, ON M5S 1M2 Canada
                [8 ]ISNI 0000 0004 1936 8331, GRID grid.410356.5, School of Kinesiology and Health Studies, and Department of Community Health and Epidemiology, , Queen’s University, ; Kingston, ON K7L 3N6 Canada
                [9 ]ISNI 0000000121138138, GRID grid.11984.35, University of Strathclyde, School of Psychological Science and Health, ; Glasgow, Scotland G1 1QE UK
                [10 ]ISNI 0000 0001 0805 4386, GRID grid.415368.d, Public Health Agency of Canada, ; Ottawa, ON K1A 0K9 Canada
                [11 ]GRID grid.17089.37, Faculty of Physical Education and Recreation, , University of Alberta, ; Edmonton, AB T6G 2H9 Canada
                [12 ]ISNI 0000 0001 0350 814X, GRID grid.416084.f, Montreal Children’s Hospital, ; Montreal, QC H3H 1P3 Canada
                [13 ]GRID grid.17089.37, Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine & Dentistry, , University of Alberta, ; Edmonton, AB T6G 1C9 Canada
                [14 ]ISNI 0000 0004 0486 528X, GRID grid.1007.6, Early Start Research Institute, Faculty of Social Sciences, , University of Wollongong, ; Wollongong, NSW 2522 Australia
                [15 ]The Sandbox Project, Toronto, ON M5C 2C5 Canada
                [16 ]ISNI 0000 0000 9402 6172, GRID grid.414148.c, Library Services, , Children’s Hospital of Eastern Ontario, ; Ottawa, ON K1H 8L1 Canada
                [17 ]ISNI 0000 0004 1936 8227, GRID grid.25073.33, Child Health & Exercise Medicine Program, Department of Pediatrics, , McMaster University, ; Hamilton, ON L8S 4K1 Canada
                Article
                4859
                10.1186/s12889-017-4859-6
                5773896
                29219102
                7ca44963-07a6-44ab-ad90-b592f91655a5
                © The Author(s). 2017

                Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

                History
                Categories
                Research
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2017

                Public health
                infants,toddlers,preschoolers,adiposity,motor development,cognitive development,public health,recommendations,guideline development

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_

                Similar content36

                Cited by173