7
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
2 collections
    0
    shares

      For submission information please click on this link: https://www.hogrefe.com/eu/service/for-journal-authors

      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found

      Does CBT for Psychosis Have an Impact on Delusions by Improving Reasoning Biases and Negative Self-Schemas? : A Secondary Mediation Analysis of Data From an Effectiveness Trial

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Abstract. Cognitive-behavioral therapy for psychosis (CBTp) builds on theoretical models that postulate reasoning biases and negative self-schemas to be involved in the formation and maintenance of delusions. However, it is unclear whether CBTp induces change in delusions by improving these proposed causal mechanisms. This study reports on a mediation analysis of a CBTp effectiveness trial in which delusions were a secondary outcome. Patients with psychosis were randomized to individualized CBTp ( n = 36) or a waiting list condition (WL; n = 34). Reasoning biases (jumping to conclusions, theory of mind, attribution biases) and self-schemas (implicit and explicit self-esteem; self-schemas related to different domains) were assessed pre- and post-therapy/WL. The results reveal an intervention effect on two of four measures of delusions and on implicit self-esteem. Nevertheless, the intervention effect on delusions was not mediated by implicit self-esteem. Changes in explicit self-schemas and reasoning biases did also not mediate the intervention effects on delusions. More focused interventions may be required to produce change in reasoning and self-schemas that have the potential to carry over to delusions.

          Related collections

          Most cited references92

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) for Schizophrenia

          The variable results of positive-negative research with schizophrenics underscore the importance of well-characterized, standardized measurement techniques. We report on the development and initial standardization of the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) for typological and dimensional assessment. Based on two established psychiatric rating systems, the 30-item PANSS was conceived as an operationalized, drug-sensitive instrument that provides balanced representation of positive and negative symptoms and gauges their relationship to one another and to global psychopathology. It thus constitutes four scales measuring positive and negative syndromes, their differential, and general severity of illness. Study of 101 schizophrenics found the four scales to be normally distributed and supported their reliability and stability. Positive and negative scores were inversely correlated once their common association with general psychopathology was extracted, suggesting that they represent mutually exclusive constructs. Review of five studies involving the PANSS provided evidence of its criterion-related validity with antecedent, genealogical, and concurrent measures, its predictive validity, its drug sensitivity, and its utility for both typological and dimensional assessment.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Mediation in experimental and nonexperimental studies: new procedures and recommendations.

              Mediation is said to occur when a causal effect of some variable X on an outcome Y is explained by some intervening variable M. The authors recommend that with small to moderate samples, bootstrap methods (B. Efron & R. Tibshirani, 1993) be used to assess mediation. Bootstrap tests are powerful because they detect that the sampling distribution of the mediated effect is skewed away from 0. They argue that R. M. Baron and D. A. Kenny's (1986) recommendation of first testing the X --> Y association for statistical significance should not be a requirement when there is a priori belief that the effect size is small or suppression is a possibility. Empirical examples and computer setups for bootstrap analyses are provided.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                zfp
                Zeitschrift für Psychologie
                Hogrefe Publishing
                2190-8370
                2151-2604
                June 27, 2018
                2018
                : 226
                : 3 , Topical Issue: Delusions: Risk Factors, Models, and Approaches to Psychological Intervention
                : 152-163
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ]Department of Social Work and Health, University of Applied Sciences Frankfurt am Main, Germany
                [ 2 ]Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy & Marburg Center for Mind, Brain and Behavior (MCMBB), Philipps-Universität Marburg, Germany
                [ 3 ]Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Institute of Psychology, Faculty of Psychology and Movement Sciences, Universität Hamburg, Germany
                Author notes
                Stephanie Mehl, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Philipps University Marburg, Rudolf-Bultmann-Straße 8, 35037 Marburg, Germany, stephanie.mehl@ 123456uni-marburg.de
                Article
                zfp_226_3_152
                10.1027/2151-2604/a000335
                7caa30d3-fb21-4253-ae5c-5b90d154642f
                Copyright @ 2018
                History
                : November 20, 2017
                : December 2, 2017
                : December 3, 2017
                Categories
                Original Article

                Psychology,General behavioral science
                self-esteem,delusions,psychosis,CBT,mediator
                Psychology, General behavioral science
                self-esteem, delusions, psychosis, CBT, mediator

                Comments

                Comment on this article