8
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares

      Submit your digital health research with an established publisher
      - celebrating 25 years of open access

      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      A Retrospective Analysis of Provider-to-Patient Secure Messages: How Much Are They Increasing, Who Is Doing the Work, and Is the Work Happening After Hours?

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Patient portal registration and the use of secure messaging are increasing. However, little is known about how the work of responding to and initiating patient messages is distributed among care team members and how these messages may affect work after hours.

          Objective

          This study aimed to examine the growth of secure messages and determine how the work of provider responses to patient-initiated secure messages and provider-initiated secure messages is distributed across care teams and across work and after-work hours.

          Methods

          We collected secure messages sent from providers from January 1, 2013, to March 15, 2018, at Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, both in response to patient secure messages and provider-initiated secure messages. We examined counts of messages over time, how the work of responding to messages and initiating messages was distributed among health care workers, messages sent per provider, messages per unique patient, and when the work was completed (proportion of messages sent after standard work hours).

          Results

          Portal registration for patients having clinic visits increased from 33% to 62%, and increasingly more patients and providers were engaged in messaging. Provider message responses to individual patients increased significantly in both primary care and specialty practices. Message responses per specialty physician provider increased from 15 responses per provider per year to 53 responses per provider per year from 2013 to 2018, resulting in a 253% increase. Primary care physician message responses increased from 153 per provider per year to 322 from 2013 to 2018, resulting in a 110% increase. Physicians, nurse practitioners, physician assistants, and registered nurses, all contributed to the substantial increases in the number of messages sent.

          Conclusions

          Provider-sent secure messages at a large health care institution have increased substantially since implementation of secure messaging between patients and providers. The effort of responding to and initiating messages to patients was distributed across multiple provider categories. The percentage of message responses occurring after hours showed little substantial change over time compared with the overall increase in message volume.

          Related collections

          Most cited references28

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Tethered to the EHR: Primary Care Physician Workload Assessment Using EHR Event Log Data and Time-Motion Observations

          PURPOSE Primary care physicians spend nearly 2 hours on electronic health record (EHR) tasks per hour of direct patient care. Demand for non–face-to-face care, such as communication through a patient portal and administrative tasks, is increasing and contributing to burnout. The goal of this study was to assess time allocated by primary care physicians within the EHR as indicated by EHR user-event log data, both during clinic hours (defined as 8:00 am to 6:00 pm Monday through Friday) and outside clinic hours. METHODS We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 142 family medicine physicians in a single system in southern Wisconsin. All Epic (Epic Systems Corporation) EHR interactions were captured from “event logging” records over a 3-year period for both direct patient care and non–face-to-face activities, and were validated by direct observation. EHR events were assigned to 1 of 15 EHR task categories and allocated to either during or after clinic hours. RESULTS Clinicians spent 355 minutes (5.9 hours) of an 11.4-hour workday in the EHR per weekday per 1.0 clinical full-time equivalent: 269 minutes (4.5 hours) during clinic hours and 86 minutes (1.4 hours) after clinic hours. Clerical and administrative tasks including documentation, order entry, billing and coding, and system security accounted for nearly one-half of the total EHR time (157 minutes, 44.2%). Inbox management accounted for another 85 minutes (23.7%). CONCLUSIONS Primary care physicians spend more than one-half of their workday, nearly 6 hours, interacting with the EHR during and after clinic hours. EHR event logs can identify areas of EHR-related work that could be delegated, thus reducing workload, improving professional satisfaction, and decreasing burnout. Direct time-motion observations validated EHR-event log data as a reliable source of information regarding clinician time allocation.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Electronic patient portals: evidence on health outcomes, satisfaction, efficiency, and attitudes: a systematic review.

            Patient portals tied to provider electronic health record (EHR) systems are increasingly popular. To systematically review the literature reporting the effect of patient portals on clinical care. PubMed and Web of Science searches from 1 January 1990 to 24 January 2013. Hypothesis-testing or quantitative studies of patient portals tethered to a provider EHR that addressed patient outcomes, satisfaction, adherence, efficiency, utilization, attitudes, and patient characteristics, as well as qualitative studies of barriers or facilitators, were included. Two reviewers independently extracted data and addressed discrepancies through consensus discussion. From 6508 titles, 14 randomized, controlled trials; 21 observational, hypothesis-testing studies; 5 quantitative, descriptive studies; and 6 qualitative studies were included. Evidence is mixed about the effect of portals on patient outcomes and satisfaction, although they may be more effective when used with case management. The effect of portals on utilization and efficiency is unclear, although patient race and ethnicity, education level or literacy, and degree of comorbid conditions may influence use. Limited data for most outcomes and an absence of reporting on organizational and provider context and implementation processes. Evidence that patient portals improve health outcomes, cost, or utilization is insufficient. Patient attitudes are generally positive, but more widespread use may require efforts to overcome racial, ethnic, and literacy barriers. Portals represent a new technology with benefits that are still unclear. Better understanding requires studies that include details about context, implementation factors, and cost.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Electronic medical records and physician stress in primary care: results from the MEMO Study.

              Little has been written about physician stress that may be associated with electronic medical records (EMR).
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                JMIR Med Inform
                JMIR Med Inform
                JMI
                JMIR Medical Informatics
                JMIR Publications (Toronto, Canada )
                2291-9694
                July 2020
                8 July 2020
                : 8
                : 7
                : e16521
                Affiliations
                [1 ] Division of Community Internal Medicine Department of Medicine Mayo Clinic Rochester, MN United States
                [2 ] Mayo Clinic Rochester, MN United States
                [3 ] Undergraduate Research Education Program Mayo Clinic Rochester, MN United States
                [4 ] Department of Medicine NYU Grossman School of Medicine New York, NY United States
                [5 ] Department of Family Medicine Mayo Clinic Rochester, MN United States
                Author notes
                Corresponding Author: Frederick North north.frederick@ 123456mayo.edu
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3696-4595
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8463-6724
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5758-0403
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2901-0336
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5634-8397
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6578-6572
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1970-1344
                Article
                v8i7e16521
                10.2196/16521
                7381047
                32673238
                7caaeee0-3197-43c4-b85e-1aee42160074
                ©Frederick North, Kristine E Luhman, Eric A Mallmann, Toby J Mallmann, Sidna M Tulledge-Scheitel, Emily J North, Jennifer L Pecina. Originally published in JMIR Medical Informatics (http://medinform.jmir.org), 08.07.2020.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIR Medical Informatics, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on http://medinform.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.

                History
                : 24 November 2019
                : 16 February 2020
                : 17 March 2020
                : 15 April 2020
                Categories
                Original Paper
                Original Paper

                patient messages,secure messages,patient portal,provider messages,electronic health records,electronic mail,communication,patients,physicians,physician assistants,nurse practitioners,nurses

                Comments

                Comment on this article