8
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      From cacti to carnivores: Improved phylotranscriptomic sampling and hierarchical homology inference provide further insight into the evolution of Caryophyllales

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Related collections

          Most cited references59

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Salinity tolerance in halophytes.

          Halophytes, plants that survive to reproduce in environments where the salt concentration is around 200 mm NaCl or more, constitute about 1% of the world's flora. Some halophytes show optimal growth in saline conditions; others grow optimally in the absence of salt. However, the tolerance of all halophytes to salinity relies on controlled uptake and compartmentalization of Na+, K+ and Cl- and the synthesis of organic 'compatible' solutes, even where salt glands are operative. Although there is evidence that different species may utilize different transporters in their accumulation of Na+, in general little is known of the proteins and regulatory networks involved. Consequently, it is not yet possible to assign molecular mechanisms to apparent differences in rates of Na+ and Cl- uptake, in root-to-shoot transport (xylem loading and retrieval), or in net selectivity for K+ over Na+. At the cellular level, H+-ATPases in the plasma membrane and tonoplast, as well as the tonoplast H+-PPiase, provide the trans-membrane proton motive force used by various secondary transporters. The widespread occurrence, taxonomically, of halophytes and the general paucity of information on the molecular regulation of tolerance mechanisms persuade us that research should be concentrated on a number of 'model' species that are representative of the various mechanisms that might be involved in tolerance.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Gene Trees in Species Trees

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              ASTRAL-II: coalescent-based species tree estimation with many hundreds of taxa and thousands of genes

              Motivation: The estimation of species phylogenies requires multiple loci, since different loci can have different trees due to incomplete lineage sorting, modeled by the multi-species coalescent model. We recently developed a coalescent-based method, ASTRAL, which is statistically consistent under the multi-species coalescent model and which is more accurate than other coalescent-based methods on the datasets we examined. ASTRAL runs in polynomial time, by constraining the search space using a set of allowed ‘bipartitions’. Despite the limitation to allowed bipartitions, ASTRAL is statistically consistent. Results: We present a new version of ASTRAL, which we call ASTRAL-II. We show that ASTRAL-II has substantial advantages over ASTRAL: it is faster, can analyze much larger datasets (up to 1000 species and 1000 genes) and has substantially better accuracy under some conditions. ASTRAL’s running time is O ( n 2 k | X | 2 ) , and ASTRAL-II’s running time is O ( n k | X | 2 ) , where n is the number of species, k is the number of loci and X is the set of allowed bipartitions for the search space. Availability and implementation: ASTRAL-II is available in open source at https://github.com/smirarab/ASTRAL and datasets used are available at http://www.cs.utexas.edu/~phylo/datasets/astral2/. Contact: smirarab@gmail.com Supplementary information: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                American Journal of Botany
                Am J Bot
                Wiley
                00029122
                March 2018
                March 2018
                May 08 2018
                : 105
                : 3
                : 446-462
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Ecology & Evolutionary Biology; University of Michigan; 830 North University Avenue Ann Arbor MI 48109-1048 USA
                [2 ]Department of Plant and Microbial Biology; University of Minnesota-Twin Cities; 1445 Gortner Avenue St. Paul MN 55108 USA
                [3 ]Department of Plant Sciences; University of Cambridge; Cambridge CB2 3EA UK
                [4 ]Department of Biology; Oberlin College; Science Center K111, 119 Woodland Street Oberlin OH 44074-1097 USA
                [5 ]Institute of Computational and Mathematical Engineering (ICME); Stanford University; 475 Via Ortega, Suite B060 Stanford CA 94305-4042 USA
                [6 ]School of Biological Sciences; Victoria University of Wellington; Kelburn Parade Kelburn Wellington 6012 New Zealand
                [7 ]Department of Research, Conservation and Collections; Desert Botanical Garden; 1201 N. Galvin Pkwy Phoenix AZ 85008 USA
                [8 ]Institut für Molekulare Physiologie; Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz; D-55099 Mainz Germany
                [9 ]Institut für Molekulare und Organismische Evolutionsbiologie; Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz; D-55099 Mainz Germany
                [10 ]Sukkulenten-Sammlung Zürich / Grün Stadt Zürich; Mythenquai 88 CH-8002 Zürich Switzerland
                [11 ]Departamento de Botánica; Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México; Apartado, Postal 70-367 04510 Mexico City Mexico
                Article
                10.1002/ajb2.1069
                29738076
                7ce0b73c-72ae-497c-b97c-c1b01b44e9d7
                © 2018

                http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/tdm_license_1.1

                http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/

                http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article