0
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Protocol of trans-Tasman feasibility randomised controlled trial of the Younger Women’s Wellness After Breast Cancer (YWWACP) lifestyle intervention

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Younger women (defined as those < 50 years who are likely pre-menopausal at time of diagnosis) with breast cancer often experience persistent treatment-related side effects that adversely affect their physical and psychological wellbeing. The Women’s Wellness After Cancer Program (WWACP) was adapted and piloted in Australia to address these outcomes in younger women. The aims of this feasibility study are to determine (1) the potential to translate the Younger WWACP (YWWACP) intervention to a broader population base in Aotearoa/New Zealand and Australia, and (2) the potential for success of a larger, international, phase ΙΙΙ, randomised controlled trial.

          Methods

          This bi-national, randomised, single-blinded controlled trial involves two main study sites in Aotearoa/New Zealand (Kōwhai study) and Australia (EMERALD study). Young women aged 18 to 50 years who completed intensive treatment (surgery, chemotherapy, and/or radiotherapy) for breast cancer in the previous 24 months are eligible. The potential to translate the YWWACP to women in these two populations will be assessed according to several feasibility outcomes. These include examining intervention accessibility, acceptability and uptake; intervention sustainability and adherence; the prevalence components of the intervention in the control group; intervention efficacy; participants’ perception of measurement burden; the effectiveness of planned recruitment strategies; and trial methods and procedures. The studies collectively aim to enrol 60 participants in the intervention group and 60 participants in the control group (total = 120 participants).

          Discussion

          Ethical approval has been received from the Southern Health and Disability Ethics Committee (Kōwhai ref: 19/STH/215), and Uniting Care Human Research Ethics Committee (EMERALD ref: 202103). This study will provide important data on the feasibility of the refined YWWACP in the trans-Tasman context. This study will account for and harmonise cross-country differences to ensure the success of a proposed international grant application for a phase ΙΙΙ randomised controlled trial of this program to improve outcomes in younger women living with breast cancer.

          Trial registration

          Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ANZCTR): Kōwhai ACTRN12620000260921, registered on 27 February 2020. EMERALD ACTRN12621000447853, registered on 19 April 2021.

          Supplementary Information

          The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40814-022-01114-z.

          Related collections

          Most cited references18

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The Pittsburgh sleep quality index: A new instrument for psychiatric practice and research

          Despite the prevalence of sleep complaints among psychiatric patients, few questionnaires have been specifically designed to measure sleep quality in clinical populations. The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) is a self-rated questionnaire which assesses sleep quality and disturbances over a 1-month time interval. Nineteen individual items generate seven "component" scores: subjective sleep quality, sleep latency, sleep duration, habitual sleep efficiency, sleep disturbances, use of sleeping medication, and daytime dysfunction. The sum of scores for these seven components yields one global score. Clinical and clinimetric properties of the PSQI were assessed over an 18-month period with "good" sleepers (healthy subjects, n = 52) and "poor" sleepers (depressed patients, n = 54; sleep-disorder patients, n = 62). Acceptable measures of internal homogeneity, consistency (test-retest reliability), and validity were obtained. A global PSQI score greater than 5 yielded a diagnostic sensitivity of 89.6% and specificity of 86.5% (kappa = 0.75, p less than 0.001) in distinguishing good and poor sleepers. The clinimetric and clinical properties of the PSQI suggest its utility both in psychiatric clinical practice and research activities.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            The Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI): a multidimensional self-report instrument for the assessment of female sexual function.

            This article presents the development of a brief, self-report measure of female sexual function. Initial face validity testing of questionnaire items, identified by an expert panel, was followed by a study aimed at further refining the questionnaire. It was administered to 131 normal controls and 128 age-matched subjects with female sexual arousal disorder (FSAD) at five research centers. Based on clinical interpretations of a principal components analysis, a 6-domain structure was identified, which included desire, subjective arousal, lubrication, orgasm, satisfaction, and pain. Overall test-retest reliability coefficients were high for each of the individual domains (r = 0.79 to 0.86) and a high degree of internal consistency was observed (Cronbach's alpha values of 0.82 and higher) Good construct validity was demonstrated by highly significant mean difference scores between the FSAD and control groups for each of the domains (p < or = 0.001). Additionally, divergent validity with a scale of marital satisfaction was observed. These results support the reliability and psychometric (as well as clinical) validity of the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) in the assessment of key dimensions of female sexual function in clinical and nonclinical samples. Our findings also suggest important gender differences in the patterning of female sexual function in comparison with similar questionnaire studies in males.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Validating the SF-36 health survey questionnaire: new outcome measure for primary care.

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                n.vear@uq.edu.au
                Journal
                Pilot Feasibility Stud
                Pilot Feasibility Stud
                Pilot and Feasibility Studies
                BioMed Central (London )
                2055-5784
                2 August 2022
                2 August 2022
                2022
                : 8
                : 165
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Cancer Trials New Zealand, Auckland, New Zealand
                [2 ]GRID grid.29980.3a, ISNI 0000 0004 1936 7830, University of Otago, ; Dunedin, New Zealand
                [3 ]GRID grid.1003.2, ISNI 0000 0000 9320 7537, University of Queensland, ; Brisbane, Australia
                [4 ]Wesley Choices Cancer Support Centre, Brisbane, Australia
                [5 ]GRID grid.117476.2, ISNI 0000 0004 1936 7611, University of Technology, ; Sydney, Australia
                [6 ]GRID grid.9654.e, ISNI 0000 0004 0372 3343, University of Auckland, ; Auckland, New Zealand
                [7 ]GRID grid.414055.1, ISNI 0000 0000 9027 2851, Department of Oncology, , Auckland Hospital, ; Auckland, New Zealand
                [8 ]GRID grid.413952.8, ISNI 0000 0004 0408 3667, Department of Oncology, , Waikato Hospital, ; Hamilton, New Zealand
                [9 ]GRID grid.413952.8, ISNI 0000 0004 0408 3667, Department of Surgery, , Waikato Hospital, ; Hamilton, New Zealand
                [10 ]GRID grid.1064.3, Mater Research Institute, ; Brisbane, Australia
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6068-1248
                Article
                1114
                10.1186/s40814-022-01114-z
                9343821
                7d0df7da-8b7b-4f35-a923-329c1403caaf
                © The Author(s) 2022

                Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

                History
                : 15 October 2021
                : 11 July 2022
                Funding
                Funded by: Health Research Council Aotearoa/New Zealand
                Award ID: 19/622
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100011890, Wesley Medical Research;
                Award ID: ID2020CR02
                Categories
                Study Protocol
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2022

                breast cancer,feasibility,acceptability,translation
                breast cancer, feasibility, acceptability, translation

                Comments

                Comment on this article