+1 Recommend
0 collections
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      4β-Hydroxycholesterol, an endogenous marker of CYP3A4/5 activity in humans.

      British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology

      Biological Markers, blood, Cytochrome P-450 CYP3A, genetics, metabolism, Ethnic Groups, Genotype, Humans, Hydroxycholesterols, Phenotype, Sex Characteristics

      Read this article at

          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.


          We have proposed that 4β-hydroxycholesterol (4β-OHC) may be used as an endogenous marker of CYP3A activity. The cholesterol metabolite 4β-OHC is formed by CYP3A4. Treatment of patients with strong inducers of CYP3A enzymes, e.g. anti-epileptic drugs, resulted in 10-fold increased concentrations of plasma 4β-OHC, while treatment with CYP3A inhibitors such as ritonavir or itraconazole resulted in decreased plasma concentrations. There was a relationship between the 4β-OHC concentration and the number of active CYP3A5*1 alleles showing that 4β-OHC was not only formed by CYP3A4, but also by CYP3A5. The concentration of 4β-OHC was higher in women than in men, confirming previous studies indicating a gender difference in CYP3A4/5-activity. The rate of elimination of 4β-OHC is slow (half-life 17 days) which results in stable plasma concentrations within individuals, but limits its use to study rapid changes in CYP3A activity. In short-term studies exogenous markers such as midazolam or quinine may be superior, but in long-term studies 4β-OHC is a sensitive marker of CYP3A activity, especially to assess induction but also inhibition. Under conditions where the cholesterol concentration is changing, the ratio of 4β-OHC:cholesterol may be used as an alternative to 4β-OHC itself. The use of an endogenous CYP3A marker has obvious advantages and may be of value both during drug development and for monitoring CYP3A activity in patients. © 2011 The Authors. British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology © 2011 The British Pharmacological Society.

          Related collections

          Author and article information



          Comment on this article