5
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      CTNI-67. EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF LAROTRECTINIB IN PATIENTS WITH TROPOMYOSIN RECEPTOR KINASE (TRK) FUSION PRIMARY CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM (CNS) TUMORS: AN EXPANDED DATASET

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          BACKGROUND

          TRK fusion proteins are oncogenic drivers of various CNS and non-CNS tumors. Larotrectinib, a highly selective FDA- and EMA-approved TRK inhibitor, demonstrated an objective response rate (ORR) of 79% across various non-CNS cancers (Hong et al. Lancet Oncol. 2020). We report data in an expanded set of TRK fusion primary CNS tumors treated with larotrectinib.

          METHODS

          Patients with primary CNS tumors harboring an NTRK gene fusion treated with larotrectinib in two clinical trials (NCT02637687, NCT02576431) were identified. Disease status was investigator-assessed (RANO). Data cutoff: July 15, 2019.

          RESULTS

          Twenty-four patients with TRK fusion primary CNS tumors were identified. Eighteen patients had gliomas (13 high-grade and five low-grade). Median age was 8.0 years (range 1.3–79.0), with 20 patients < 18 years old. ORR was 29% (95% CI 13–51%); best responses were two complete responses, five partial responses (two pending confirmation), 15 stable disease, and two progressive disease. The 24-week disease control rate was 63% (95% CI 41–81%). For the five confirmed responders, median time to best response was 1.8 months and median duration of response was 4.9 months (range 1.7+ to 10.1+). Median progression-free survival was 11.0 months (range 1.1 to 19.8+) and median overall survival was not reached (range 1.9+ to 21.4+) at a median follow-up of 6.0 months. Treatment duration ranged from 1.2 to 21.4+ months; three patients continued treatment beyond progression. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were mainly Grade 1 and 2. Grade 3–4 TEAEs occurred in 10 patients, with two deemed related to larotrectinib. The most common neurological TEAE was headache in three patients (Grade 1–2). No patients discontinued larotrectinib due to AEs.

          CONCLUSIONS

          Larotrectinib was active and well tolerated in patients with TRK fusion primary CNS tumors. These results support testing for NTRK gene fusions in patients with primary CNS tumors.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          Neuro-Oncology
          Oxford University Press (OUP)
          1522-8517
          1523-5866
          November 2020
          November 09 2020
          November 09 2020
          November 2020
          November 09 2020
          November 09 2020
          : 22
          : Supplement_2
          : ii58
          Affiliations
          [1 ]CHU Sainte Justine, Montreal, Montreal, Canada
          [2 ]Institut Curie and Paris University, Paris, France
          [3 ]Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center & Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
          [4 ]Gustave Roussy, Department of Pediatric and Adolescent Oncology, Université Paris-Sud, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France
          [5 ]START Madrid CIOCC, Madrid, Spain
          [6 ]Children and Young Peoples Unit, Royal Marsden Hospital, Surrey, United Kingdom
          [7 ]Dana-Farber/Boston Children’s Cancer and Blood Disorders Center, Boston, MA, USA
          [8 ]Lineberger Cancer Center, University of North Carolina Hospitals, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
          [9 ]The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
          [10 ]Early Phase Trials Unit, Institute Bergonie, Bordeaux, France
          [11 ]Seoul National University Children’s Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea
          [12 ]Department of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, University Hospital Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
          [13 ]Department of Pediatric Oncology, Skåne University Hospital, Lund & Karolinska University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
          [14 ]Department of Haemato-Oncology, Our Lady’s Children’s Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
          [15 ]Department of Pediatric Oncology/Hematology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
          [16 ]National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan
          [17 ]Sydney Children’s Hospital, Sydney, Australia
          [18 ]Sydney Children’s Hospital, New South Wales, Australia
          [19 ]Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Whippany, NJ, USA
          [20 ]Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Whippany, USA
          [21 ]University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center/Children’s Health, Dallas, TX, USA
          [22 ]Hopp Children’s Cancer Center Heidelberg (KiTZ), Heidelberg University Hospital and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
          Article
          10.1093/neuonc/noaa215.233
          7d46e09d-ee29-4843-ab42-814f9531d8f3
          © 2020

          https://academic.oup.com/journals/pages/open_access/funder_policies/chorus/standard_publication_model

          History

          Comments

          Comment on this article