32
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Overt Visual Attention as a Causal Factor of Perceptual Awareness

      research-article
      1 , * , 1 , 2 ,   1
      PLoS ONE
      Public Library of Science

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Our everyday conscious experience of the visual world is fundamentally shaped by the interaction of overt visual attention and object awareness. Although the principal impact of both components is undisputed, it is still unclear how they interact. Here we recorded eye-movements preceding and following conscious object recognition, collected during the free inspection of ambiguous and corresponding unambiguous stimuli. Using this paradigm, we demonstrate that fixations recorded prior to object awareness predict the later recognized object identity, and that subjects accumulate more evidence that is consistent with their later percept than for the alternative. The timing of reached awareness was verified by a reaction-time based correction method and also based on changes in pupil dilation. Control experiments, in which we manipulated the initial locus of visual attention, confirm a causal influence of overt attention on the subsequent result of object perception. The current study thus demonstrates that distinct patterns of overt attentional selection precede object awareness and thereby directly builds on recent electrophysiological findings suggesting two distinct neuronal mechanisms underlying the two phenomena. Our results emphasize the crucial importance of overt visual attention in the formation of our conscious experience of the visual world.

          Related collections

          Most cited references48

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Attention and consciousness: two distinct brain processes.

          The close relationship between attention and consciousness has led many scholars to conflate these processes. This article summarizes psychophysical evidence, arguing that top-down attention and consciousness are distinct phenomena that need not occur together and that can be manipulated using distinct paradigms. Subjects can become conscious of an isolated object or the gist of a scene despite the near absence of top-down attention; conversely, subjects can attend to perceptually invisible objects. Furthermore, top-down attention and consciousness can have opposing effects. Such dissociations are easier to understand when the different functions of these two processes are considered. Untangling their tight relationship is necessary for the scientific elucidation of consciousness and its material substrate.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Why visual attention and awareness are different.

            Now that the study of consciousness is warmly embraced by cognitive scientists, much confusion seems to arise between the concepts of visual attention and visual awareness. Often, visual awareness is equated to what is in the focus of attention. There are, however, two sets of arguments to separate attention from awareness: a psychological/theoretical one and a neurobiological one. By combining these arguments I present definitions of visual attention and awareness that clearly distinguish between the two, yet explain why attention and awareness are so intricately related. In fact, there seems more overlap between mechanisms of memory and awareness than between those of attention and awareness.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Task and context determine where you look.

              The deployment of human gaze has been almost exclusively studied independent of any specific ongoing task and limited to two-dimensional picture viewing. This contrasts with its use in everyday life, which mostly consists of purposeful tasks where gaze is crucially involved. To better understand deployment of gaze under such circumstances, we devised a series of experiments, in which subjects navigated along a walkway in a virtual environment and executed combinations of approach and avoidance tasks. The position of the body and the gaze were monitored during the execution of the task combinations and dependence of gaze on the ongoing tasks as well as the visual features of the scene was analyzed. Gaze distributions were compared to a random gaze allocation strategy as well as a specific "saliency model." Gaze distributions showed high similarity across subjects. Moreover, the precise fixation locations on the objects depended on the ongoing task to the point that the specific tasks could be predicted from the subject's fixation data. By contrast, gaze allocation according to a random or a saliency model did not predict the executed fixations or the observed dependence of fixation locations on the specific task.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: Editor
                Journal
                PLoS One
                plos
                plosone
                PLoS ONE
                Public Library of Science (San Francisco, USA )
                1932-6203
                2011
                25 July 2011
                : 6
                : 7
                : e22614
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Institute of Cognitive Science, University of Osnabrück, Osnabrück, Germany
                [2 ]Department of Systems Neuroscience, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
                University of British Columbia, United States of America
                Author notes

                Conceived and designed the experiments: TCK SG PK. Performed the experiments: TCK SG. Analyzed the data: TCK SG PK. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: TCK SG PK. Wrote the paper: TCK. Edited and commented on the manuscript: TCK SG PK.

                Article
                PONE-D-11-02372
                10.1371/journal.pone.0022614
                3143177
                21799920
                7db89ec7-260c-4047-aec1-bb95408e3cd8
                Kietzmann et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
                History
                : 31 January 2011
                : 30 June 2011
                Page count
                Pages: 9
                Categories
                Research Article
                Biology
                Neuroscience
                Cognitive Neuroscience
                Cognition
                Consciousness
                Sensory Perception
                Psychophysics
                Sensory Systems
                Visual System
                Behavioral Neuroscience
                Neuropsychology
                Medicine
                Mental Health
                Psychology
                Behavior
                Attention (Behavior)
                Psychophysics
                Social and Behavioral Sciences
                Psychology
                Behavior
                Attention (Behavior)
                Psychophysics

                Uncategorized
                Uncategorized

                Comments

                Comment on this article