5
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
3 collections
    0
    shares

      Submit your digital health research with an established publisher
      - celebrating 25 years of open access

      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Authors' Response to Peer Reviews of “Early Experience With Neutralizing Monoclonal Antibody Therapy for COVID-19: Retrospective Cohort Survival Analysis and Descriptive Study”

      author-comment

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Related collections

          Most cited references2

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          Early Experience With Neutralizing Monoclonal Antibody Therapy for COVID-19: Retrospective Cohort Survival Analysis and Descriptive Study

          Background Neutralizing monoclonal antibody (MAB) therapies may benefit patients with mild to moderate COVID-19 at high risk for progressing to severe COVID-19 or hospitalization. Studies documenting approaches to deliver MAB infusions and demonstrating their efficacy are lacking. Objective We describe our experience and the outcomes of almost 3000 patients who received MAB infusion therapy at Northwell Health, a large integrated health care system in New York. Methods This is a descriptive study of adult patients who received MAB therapy between November 20, 2020, to January 31, 2021, and a retrospective cohort survival analysis comparing patients who received MAB therapy prior to admission versus those who did not. A multivariable Cox model with inverse probability weighting according to the propensity score including covariates (sociodemographic, comorbidities, and presenting vital signs) was used. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality; additional evaluations included emergency department use and hospitalization within 28 days of a positive COVID-19 test for patients who received MAB therapy. Results During the study period, 2818 adult patients received MAB infusion. Following therapy and within 28 days of a COVID-19 test, 123 (4.4%) patients presented to the emergency department and were released, and 145 (5.1%) patients were hospitalized. These 145 patients were compared with 200 controls who were eligible for but did not receive MAB therapy and were hospitalized. In the MAB group, 16 (11%) patients met the primary outcome of in-hospital mortality, versus 21 (10.5%) in the control group. In an unadjusted Cox model, the hazard ratio (HR) for time to in-hospital mortality for the MAB group was 1.38 (95% CI 0.696-2.719). Models adjusting for demographics (HR 1.1, 95% CI 0.53-2.23), demographics and Charlson Comorbidity Index (HR 1.22, 95% CI 0.573-2.59), and with inverse probability weighting according to propensity scores (HR 1.19, 95% CI 0.619-2.29) did not demonstrate significance. The hospitalization rate was 4.4% for patients who received MAB therapy within 0 to 4 days, 5% within 5 to 7 days, and 6.1% in ≥8 days of symptom onset ( P =.15). Conclusions Establishing the capability to provide neutralizing MAB infusion therapy requires substantial planning and coordination. Although this therapy may be an important treatment option for early mild to moderate COVID-19 in patients who are at high risk, further investigations are needed to define the optimal timing of MAB treatment to reduce hospitalization and mortality.
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            Peer Review of “Early Experience With Neutralizing Monoclonal Antibody Therapy for COVID-19: Retrospective Cohort Survival Analysis and Descriptive Study”

            (2021)

              Author and article information

              Contributors
              Journal
              JMIRx Med
              JMIRx Med
              JMIRxMed
              JMIRx Med
              JMIR Publications (Toronto, Canada )
              2563-6316
              Jul-Sep 2021
              27 September 2021
              27 September 2021
              : 2
              : 3
              : e33496
              Affiliations
              [1 ] Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell Hofstra University Hempstead, NY United States
              [2 ] Northwell Health New Hyde Park, NY United States
              Author notes
              Corresponding Author: Mark Jarrett mjarrett@ 123456northwell.edu
              Author information
              https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9252-3471
              https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8857-0814
              https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8320-7482
              https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4514-4839
              https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9571-1275
              https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9059-1235
              https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0721-8179
              https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3692-3734
              https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3979-8166
              Article
              v2i3e33496
              10.2196/33496
              10414264
              7db8e7a2-4707-4bb9-988a-86e1582731be
              ©Mark Jarrett, Warren Licht, Kevin Bock, Zenobia Brown, Jamie Hirsch, Kevin Coppa, Rajdeep Brar, Stephen Bello, Ira Nash. Originally published in JMIRx Med (https://med.jmirx.org), 27.09.2021.

              This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIRx Med, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on https://med.jmirx.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.

              History
              : 9 September 2021
              : 9 September 2021
              Categories
              Authors' Response to Peer Reviews
              Authors' Response to Peer Reviews

              infectious disease,monoclonal antibody therapy,covid-19,experience,therapy,drug,patient outcome,risk,efficacy,approach,treatment,pandemic,antibody,immunotherapy,immune therapy

              Comments

              Comment on this article

              Related Documents Log