6
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Recommendations for services for people living with chronic breathlessness in advanced disease: Results of a transparent expert consultation

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Chronic breathlessness is highly distressing for people with advanced disease and their informal carers, yet health services for this group remain highly heterogeneous. We aimed to generate evidence-based stakeholder-endorsed recommendations for practice, policy and research concerning services for people with advanced disease and chronic breathlessness. We used transparent expert consultation, comprising modified nominal group technique during a stakeholder workshop, and an online consensus survey. Stakeholders, representing multiple specialities and professions, and patient/carers were invited to participate. Thirty-seven participants attended the stakeholder workshop and generated 34 separate recommendations, rated by 74 online survey respondents. Seven recommendations had strong agreement and high levels of consensus. Stakeholders agreed services should be person-centred and flexible, should cut across multiple disciplines and providers and should prioritize breathlessness management in its own right. They advocated for wide geographical coverage and access to expert care, supported through skills-sharing among professionals. They also recommended recognition of informal carers and their role by clinicians and policymakers. Overall, stakeholders' recommendations reflect the need for improved access to person-centred, multi-professional care and support for carers to provide or access breathlessness management interventions. Future research should test the optimal models of care and educational strategies to meet these recommendations.

          Related collections

          Most cited references22

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          The Delphi method as a research tool: an example, design considerations and applications

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Pulmonary rehabilitation for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

            Widespread application of pulmonary rehabilitation (also known as respiratory rehabilitation) in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) should be preceded by demonstrable improvements in function (health-related quality of life, functional and maximal exercise capacity) attributable to the programmes. This review updates the review reported in 2006.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Physical frailty and pulmonary rehabilitation in COPD: a prospective cohort study

              Background Frailty is an important clinical syndrome that is consistently associated with adverse outcomes in older people. The relevance of frailty to chronic respiratory disease and its management is unknown. Objectives To determine the prevalence of frailty among patients with stable COPD and examine whether frailty affects completion and outcomes of pulmonary rehabilitation. Methods 816 outpatients with COPD (mean (SD) age 70 (10) years, FEV1% predicted 48.9 (21.0)) were recruited between November 2011 and January 2015. Frailty was assessed using the Fried criteria (weight loss, exhaustion, low physical activity, slowness and weakness) before and after pulmonary rehabilitation. Predictors of programme non-completion were identified using multivariate logistic regression, and outcomes were compared using analysis of covariance, adjusting for age and sex. Results 209/816 patients (25.6%, 95% CI 22.7 to 28.7) were frail. Prevalence of frailty increased with age, Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) stage, Medical Research Council (MRC) score and age-adjusted comorbidity burden (all p≤0.01). Patients who were frail had double the odds of programme non-completion (adjusted OR 2.20, 95% CI 1.39 to 3.46, p=0.001), often due to exacerbation and/or hospital admission. However, rehabilitation outcomes favoured frail completers, with consistently better responses in MRC score, exercise performance, physical activity level and health status (all p<0.001). After rehabilitation, 71/115 (61.3%) previously frail patients no longer met case criteria for frailty. Conclusions Frailty affects one in four patients with COPD referred for pulmonary rehabilitation and is an independent predictor of programme non-completion. However, patients who are frail respond favourably to rehabilitation and their frailty can be reversed in the short term.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Chron Respir Dis
                Chron Respir Dis
                CRD
                spcrd
                Chronic Respiratory Disease
                SAGE Publications (Sage UK: London, England )
                1479-9723
                1479-9731
                30 December 2018
                Jan-Dec 2019
                : 16
                : 1479973118816448
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy and Rehabilitation, King’s College London, London, UK
                [2 ]School of Health Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK
                [3 ]Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, UK
                [4 ]National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College, London, UK
                [5 ]Harefield Pulmonary Rehabilitation and Muscle Research Laboratory, Royal Brompton & Harefield NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
                [6 ]Department of Physiotherapy, King’s College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
                [7 ]Cicely Saunders Institute Patient and Public Involvement Group, King’s College London, London, UK
                Author notes
                [*]Lisa Jane Brighton, Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy and Rehabilitation, King’s College London, London SE5 9PJ, UK. Email: lisa.brighton@ 123456kcl.ac.uk
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0516-0102
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4542-2624
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7991-7679
                Article
                10.1177_1479973118816448
                10.1177/1479973118816448
                6313262
                7df77e98-1b9f-4f86-931b-dd2f02ee25ea
                © The Author(s) 2018

                This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License ( http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages ( https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).

                History
                : 29 March 2018
                : 6 October 2018
                Funding
                Funded by: Health Services and Delivery Research Programme, https://doi.org/10.13039/501100002001;
                Award ID: 16/02/18
                Categories
                Original Paper
                Custom metadata
                January-December 2019

                Respiratory medicine
                advanced disease,breathlessness,consultation,consensus,palliative care
                Respiratory medicine
                advanced disease, breathlessness, consultation, consensus, palliative care

                Comments

                Comment on this article