2
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      A Challenging Case of Electrical Storm in an Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator Patient

      case-report
      1 , , 1 , 1 , 2 , 3
      ,
      Cureus
      Cureus
      electrical storm, sustanied ventricular tachycardia, icd storm, amiodarone and lidocaine

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICD) have become indispensable in managing life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias. On average, 50%-70% of the patients receive a device-based therapy within the first two years post implantation. A few patients experience the electrical storm (ES). ES is a syndrome of recurrent ventricular tachycardia or fibrillation occurring two or more times in a 24-hour period, calling for the need of electrical cardioversion or defibrillation to stabilize the patient. We present the case of a patient with severe cardiomyopathy who presented with resistant ES after failing to respond initially to conventional medications like amiodarone and lidocaine. Propofol infusion was not an option due to his severe cardiomyopathy and hypotensive shock state. Aggressive treatment with intravenous medications stabilized his ES and he was eventually transferred to an outside facility for ventricular tachycardia ablation.

          Related collections

          Most cited references16

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Amiodarone for resuscitation after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest due to ventricular fibrillation.

          Whether antiarrhythmic drugs improve the rate of successful resuscitation after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest has not been determined in randomized clinical trials. We conducted a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of intravenous amiodarone in patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Patients who had cardiac arrest with ventricular fibrillation (or pulseless ventricular tachycardia) and who had not been resuscitated after receiving three or more precordial shocks were randomly assigned to receive 300 mg of intravenous amiodarone (246 patients) or placebo (258 patients). The treatment groups had similar clinical profiles. There was no significant difference between the amiodarone and placebo groups in the duration of the resuscitation attempt (42+/-16.4 and 43+/-16.3 minutes, respectively), the number of shocks delivered (4+/-3 and 6+/-5), or the proportion of patients who required additional antiarrhythmic drugs after the administration of the study drug (66 percent and 73 percent). More patients in the amiodarone group than in the placebo group had hypotension (59 percent vs. 48 percent, P=0.04) or bradycardia (41 percent vs. 25 percent, P=0.004) after receiving the study drug. Recipients of amiodarone were more likely to survive to be admitted to the hospital (44 percent, vs. 34 percent of the placebo group; P=0.03). The benefit of amiodarone was consistent among all subgroups and at all times of drug administration. The adjusted odds ratio for survival to admission to the hospital in the amiodarone group as compared with the placebo group was 1.6 (95 percent confidence interval, 1.1 to 2.4; P=0.02). The trial did not have sufficient statistical power to detect differences in survival to hospital discharge, which differed only slightly between the two groups. In patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest due to refractory ventricular arrhythmias, treatment with amiodarone resulted in a higher rate of survival to hospital admission. Whether this benefit extends to survival to discharge from the hospital merits further investigation.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Successful catheter ablation of electrical storm after myocardial infarction.

            We report on 4 patients (aged 57 to 77 years; 3 men) who developed drug-refractory, repetitive ventricular tachyarrhythmias after acute myocardial infarction (MI). All episodes of ventricular arrhythmias were triggered by monomorphic ventricular premature beats (VPBs) with a right bundle-branch block morphology (RBBB). Left ventricular (LV) mapping was performed to attempt radiofrequency (RF) ablation of the triggering VPBs. Activation mapping of the clinical VPBs demonstrated the earliest activation in the anteromedial LV in 1 patient and in the inferomedial LV in 2 patients. Short, high-frequency, low-amplitude potentials were recorded that preceded the onset of each extrasystole by a maximum of 126 to 160 ms. At the same site, a Purkinje potential was documented that preceded the onset of the QRS complex by 23 to 26 ms during sinus rhythm. In 1 patient, only pace mapping was attempted to identify areas of interest in the LV. Six to 30 RF applications abolished all local Purkinje potentials at the site of earliest activation and/or perfect pace mapping and suppressed VPBs in all patients. No episode of ventricular tachycardia or fibrillation has recurred for 33, 14, 6, and 5 months in patients 1, 2, 3, and 4, respectively. Incessant ventricular tachyarrhythmias after MI may be triggered by VPBs. RF ablation of the triggering VPBs is feasible and can prevent drug-resistant electrical storm, even after acute MI. Catheter ablation of the triggering VPBs may be used as a bailout therapy in these patients.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Treatment of torsade de pointes with magnesium sulfate.

              Twelve consecutive patients who developed torsade de pointes (polymorphous ventricular tachycardia with marked QT prolongation, TdP) over a 4 year period were treated with intravenous injections of magnesium sulfate. In nine of the patients a single bolus of 2 g completely abolished the TdP within 1 to 5 min, and in three others complete abolition of the TdP was achieved after a second bolus was given 5 to 15 min later. Nine of the patients also received continuous infusion of MgSO4 (3 to 20 mg/min) for 7 to 48 hr until the QT interval was below 0.50 sec. In nine of the 12 patients the TdP was induced by antiarrhythmic agents. The QT interval preceding TdP ranged from 0.54 to 0.72 sec. After the MgSO4 bolus, which prevented the recurrence of TdP, no significant changes were observed in the QT interval. There were no side effects of this treatment. In eight of the 12 patients potassium levels before the TdP were below 3.5 meq/liter; magnesium levels were available in eight patients before TdP, and were normal in all. Five additional patients with polymorphous ventricular tachycardia but normal QT intervals (non-TdP patients) received two to three boluses of MgSO4. This treatment was ineffective in all, but they responded to conventional antiarrhythmic therapy. Thus, MgSO4 is a very effective and safe treatment for TdP, and its application is rapid and simple. Its use is therefore recommended as the first line of therapy for TdP.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Cureus
                Cureus
                2168-8184
                Cureus
                Cureus (Palo Alto (CA) )
                2168-8184
                7 August 2020
                August 2020
                : 12
                : 8
                : e9600
                Affiliations
                [1 ] Internal Medicine, St. Francis Medical Center, Trenton, USA
                [2 ] Cardiology, Cairo University, Trenton, USA
                [3 ] Internal Medicine, Hackensack Meridian School of Medicine at Seton Hall University, Nutley, USA
                Author notes
                Article
                10.7759/cureus.9600
                7478491
                7e128c1e-40ba-4b2a-87c8-88e55394440e
                Copyright © 2020, Elkhouly et al.

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

                History
                : 19 July 2020
                : 7 August 2020
                Categories
                Cardiology
                Internal Medicine

                electrical storm,sustanied ventricular tachycardia,icd storm,amiodarone and lidocaine

                Comments

                Comment on this article