11
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Central vein rupture during percutaneous transluminal angioplasty for central vein stenosis or occlusion in haemodialysis patients

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          BACKGROUND: Endovascular treatments such as percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) and stent placements are becoming the standard method in managing haemodialysis access failure. Venous rupture is the most common complication during endovascular procedures. Complications during endovascular treatments of central venous stenosis or occlusion have been rarely reported OBJECTIVES: To investigate the incidence and management of central vein rupture while performing PTA for central vein stenosis or occlusion in haemodialysis patients METHOD: Between 1998 and 2013, PTA was performed using various techniques in haemodialysis patients for central vein stenoses (n = 2437) and occlusions (n = 666). When the guide wire passed through the stenosis or the occlusion, PTA was performed regardless of the presence of a venous rupture. The incidence of central vein rupture was analysed using the chi-square test according to the gender, location, right versus left, presence of thrombosis and stenosis versus occlusion. Percutaneous management of central vein rupture was also evaluated RESULTS: Central vein rupture occurred in 12 cases (0.39%). All ruptures occurred in the cases with occlusion. Only stenosis versus occlusion reflected a significant correlation (p < 0.001) with central vein rupture. Central vein ruptures were managed by low-pressure balloon tamponade (n = 2), stent/stent-graft (n = 5) and balloon-mediated haemostasis blocking venous inflow followed by the observation (n = 5 CONCLUSION: Central vein rupture is a rarely occurring complication while performing PTA for central vein stenosis and occlusion, and the majority can be successfully managed by percutaneous techniques

          Related collections

          Most cited references24

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Hemodialysis-associated subclavian vein stenosis.

          This study was undertaken to evaluate hemodialysis-associated subclavian vein stenosis (SVS) and to clarify treatment of this condition. Forty-seven patients underwent upper arm venography to evaluate fistula dysfunction. Subclavian vein stenosis was documented in 12. Eleven of 12 had elevated venous dialysis pressure (196 +/- 8.9 mm Hg), and six had arm edema. All 12 had previously undergone subclavian cannulation on the side of the fistula. Thirty-five patients showed no evidence of subclavian vein stenosis. Twelve of these 35 patients (mean venous dialysis pressure 113 +/- 2.3 mm Hg) had undergone previous subclavian cannulation on the side of the fistula. The mean age of the fistula at the time of venogram in patients with subclavian vein stenosis was 17.0 months versus 5.8 months in patients with ipsilateral subclavian cannulation without subclavian vein stenosis. Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) was performed on 11 of 12 patients with SVS lowering venous dialysis pressure and restoring patency to the fistula in 100%. Lesions recurred in two of 11 patients and were successfully retreated with PTA. We conclude that SVS is a common dialysis problem that is amenable to treatment with PTA. Elevated venous dialysis pressures are a sensitive indicator of this condition.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Subclavian vascular access stenosis in dialysis patients: natural history and risk factors.

            Stenosis of the subclavian vein (SVS) after cannulation occurs in 15 to 50% of chronic hemodialysis patients, and impedes the placement of an arteriovenous fistula in the ipsilateral arm. Its natural history and pathogenic mechanisms are not well established. This study examined 42 consecutive chronic renal failure patients (28 men and 14 women; 46+/-19 yr) in whom subclavian catheters had been placed as the initial vascular access for hemodialysis. All patients underwent sequential venography studies: at baseline (24 to 48 h after removal of the catheter) and 1, 3, and 6 mo thereafter. Venograms were considered abnormal when there was evidence of unequivocal strictures (more than 30% narrowing), with or without collateral circulation. At baseline, 52.4% (n=22) of patients showed stenotic vein lesions (n=19) or total thrombosis (n=3), and identical lesions were also observed after 1 mo. Surprisingly, 10 of 22 patients with initial SVS (45.4%) showed spontaneous recanalization of venous lesions in the venographies performed 3 mo after removal. The patients with normal baseline venograms (n=20) showed no change during follow-up. Patients with definitive stenosis at 6 mo (n=12) had a higher number of inserted catheters (1.58+/-0.6 versus 1.2+/-0.48; P < 0.05), longer time in place (49.08+/-32.2 versus 29.03+/-26.6 d; P < 0.05), and higher number of dialysis sessions (21+/-13.8 versus 12.4+/-11.4; P < 0.05) than those without SVS or with spontaneous recanalization of venous lesions during follow-up. Furthermore, a higher number of catheter-related infections were observed in patients with definitive SVS (66.6% versus 33.3%; P < 0.05). In summary, SVS is observed in more than half of patients 24 to 48 h after catheter removal and 1 mo later. Even when recanalization occurs in many cases, a definitive stenosis is seen in 28% of patients by the third month. Thus, the creation of an ipsilateral vascular access is possible provided that venography is normal at this time. Finally, mechanical factors and catheter-related infections are the major risk factors for the development of late SVS.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Treatment of hemodialysis-related central venous stenosis or occlusion: results of primary Wallstent placement and follow-up in 50 patients.

              To analyze the effectiveness of stent placement as the primary treatment for central venous obstruction in patients undergoing hemodialysis. Fifty-seven Wallstents were placed in 50 patients with symptomatic shunt dysfunction and arm swelling due to central venous obstruction. Technical success, complication, and patency rates were evaluated. Stent deployment was successful in all patients, and early rethrombosis (within 1 week) was noted in one patient (2%). Seventy-three episodes of reobstruction occurred and were treated percutaneously with angioplasty alone in 54 cases (74%). Nineteen cases (26%) necessitated additional stent placement. The 3-, 6-, 12-, and 24-month primary patency rates were 92%, 84%, 56%, and 28%, respectively. Cumulative overall stent patency was 97% after 6 and 12 months, 89% after 24 months, and 81% after 36 and 48 months. In the treatment of brachiocephalic and subclavian venous obstruction, stent placement shows excellent technical results and helps preserve vascular access for a substantial period. Multiple repeat interventions are, however, frequently required to maintain patency.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: ND
                Role: ND
                Role: ND
                Role: ND
                Role: ND
                Role: ND
                Role: ND
                Journal
                sajr
                SA Journal of Radiology
                S. Afr. J. radiol. (Online)
                Radiological Society of South Africa (Johannesburg, Gauteng, South Africa )
                1027-202X
                2078-6778
                2017
                : 21
                : 1
                : 1-5
                Affiliations
                [03] Bucheon orgnameSoonchunhyang University Hospital orgdiv1Department of Radiology South Korea
                [04] Seoul orgnameSoonchunhyang University Hospital orgdiv1Department of Radiology South Korea
                [02] Gumi orgnameSoonchunhyang University Hospital orgdiv1Department of Radiology South Korea
                [01] orgnameSeonam University College of Medicine orgdiv1Presbyterian Medical Center orgdiv2Department of Radiology, South Korea
                Article
                S2078-67782017000100016
                10.4102/sajr.v21i1.1205
                7e1fef3f-a4bb-4b93-9096-f65927a989dc

                This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

                History
                : 26 April 2017
                : 30 August 2017
                Page count
                Figures: 0, Tables: 0, Equations: 0, References: 24, Pages: 5
                Product

                SciELO South Africa


                Comments

                Comment on this article