17
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      A Helping Hand: RNA-Binding Proteins Guide Gene-Binding Choices by Cohesin Complexes

      other
      , *
      PLoS Genetics
      Public Library of Science

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Cohesin complexes have been extensively studied for their roles in sister chromatid cohesion during cell division, and in addition, regulate transcription through multiple mechanisms. Together with Nipped-B, a cohesin-loading factor that facilitates enhancer-promoter interactions, cohesins bind many activated enhancers but seem to preferentially associate with a subset of active genes linked to growth control and development [1]. This is consistent with findings that mutations in Nipped-B lead to Cornelia de Lange syndrome (CdLS), a genetic condition accompanied by developmental abnormalities and intellectual delay. The mechanism by which cohesin and Nipped B “choose” their gene targets from all the active genes has been elusive. A recent study by Swain et al. [2] provides important insights into this selection process. Using chromatin immunoprecipitations, followed by deep sequencing (ChIP-seq), bioinformatics, and binding studies, Swain et al. [2] identify two RNA-binding proteins, TBPH and Lark, that help guide the selection of genes bound by cohesin and Nipped-B. This is achieved by binding to nascent RNA transcripts and subsequent stabilization of cohesin and Nipped-B complexes on DNA (Fig 1). 10.1371/journal.pgen.1006419.g001 Fig 1 Model for TBPH and Lark interacting with Nipped-B and cohesin. TBPH binds to UG-rich sequences on nascent transcripts. This recruits Nipped-B, which in turn recruits cohesin and Lark to DNA. TBPH also participates in the splicing of newly transcribed RNAs. In future work it will be interesting to determine how nuclear depletion of TDP-43 or disease-associated mutations affect the coupling of transcription regulation by cohesion/Nipped-B and RNA processing, whether it is (1) splicing or (2) mRNA transport, translation, or association with RNA stress granules. It also remains to be determined whether TBPH/TDP-43 associates with the same RNA targets in all steps of RNA metabolism. TBPH is the Drosophila homolog of TAR DNA-binding protein (TARDP, or TDP-43), which harbors nuclear localization and export signals (NLS, NES), two RNA recognition motifs (RRMs), and a C terminus low complexity, prion-like domain [3]. It has been implicated in multiple aspects of gene expression, including transcription, splicing, mRNA transport, association with RNA stress granules (SGs), and translation [4]. Similar to TBPH, Lark, also known as RBM4, is an RNA-binding protein involved in splicing and translation regulation, comprising two RRM domains and a low complexity C terminus domain that are separated by a C2HC Zn finger-binding motif [5]. Multiple lines of evidence led the authors to hypothesize that RNA-binding proteins may help define the repertoire of genes bound by cohesin and Nipped-B complexes. First, TBPH/TDP-43 has been shown to bind UG repeats within its RNA targets [6–8], while Nipped-B associates preferentially with genes containing TG repeats downstream of transcription start sites [9]. Second, TDP-43 was found to regulate the transcription of the testis-specific mouse acrv1 gene by binding to TGTGTG sequences within its promoter. Deletion of RRM1 or disabling RNA binding compromise TDP-43’s repressor function, suggesting that an RNA intermediate may be involved in its role as a transcriptional repressor [10]. Third, RNA immunoprecipitation experiments identified several transcripts produced by Nipped-B-bound genes as Lark targets [11]. Lark was also found to associate with transcripts of cohesin-bound genes by RNA affinity chromatography and mass spectrometry approaches [2]. To test this intriguing hypothesis, Swain et al. [2] used a ChIP-seq approach and found that cohesin, Nipped B, TBPH, and Lark bind genes and regulatory sequences such as enhancers and Polycomb Response Elements (PREs) in highly comparable patterns. This occurs both in cultured Drosophila cells and in wing epithelia, suggesting that these binding patterns are also present in vivo, in a developmental context. Next, the authors proceeded to decipher the mechanistic interactions between cohesion/Nipped-B and RNA-binding proteins using loss of function approaches. Depletion of TBPH by RNAi indicates that this RNA-binding protein facilitates the occupancy by cohesin and Nipped-B of most regulatory promoters, enhancers, and PREs with which they normally associate. In contrast, Lark appears to modify cohesin and Nipped-B binding sites differentially, depending on whether the sequences are contained within promoters, enhancers, or PREs. In the future, it will be interesting to determine what other molecular players may be mediating the complex effects of Lark on cohesin and Nipped-B and what the physiological consequences are of these seemingly differential interactions. In keeping with these complexities, RNAi depletion studies indicate that Nipped-B also facilitates the binding of TBPH and Lark to genes and their regulatory sequences. This underscores the interdependency between cohesin/Nipped-B on one hand and RNA-binding proteins on another, and highlights an intricate interplay between these DNA- and RNA-binding proteins that will be important to uncover in future studies. Co-immunoprecipitation experiments from nuclear extracts indicate that these proteins form a complex driven by protein–protein interactions, independent of the presence of DNA or RNA. Furthermore, transcription is not required to maintain the association of Nipped-B, TBPH, and Lark with chromosomes. Together with in vitro RNA–protein binding studies, these findings support a scenario where TBPH and Lark interact with nascent RNAs generated from cohesin-binding genes and help stabilize Nipped-B, which in turn loads cohesin onto chromosomes. Although more work is needed in the future to determine the precise order of assembly, perhaps using live imaging studies, the data presented by Swain et al. [2] provides strong evidence for this model (Fig 1). What does the future hold for the interplay between cohesin/Nipped-B- and RNA-binding proteins in regulating gene expression? The report highlighted here [2] opens up several new questions related to coordination of transcription and RNA processing during development, under stress and in disease (Fig 1). How might cohesin and Nipped-B aid RNA processing steps, including splicing, mRNA transport, and translation, that both TBPH/TDP-43 and Lark have been implicated in? It will be particularly interesting to determine the relationships between gene transcription and RNA processing controlled by TBPH/TDP-43 and Lark in a tissue-specific manner during development, as they may reveal novel mechanisms of human disease. TDP-43 is a DNA/RNA-binding protein linked to amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) and frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD), two fatal neurodegenerative diseases [12]. Overwhelmingly, evidence points to depletion of TDP-43 from the nucleus and cytoplasmic accumulation as key factors in the pathomechanism of disease [13], therefore raising the possibility that misexpression of genes regulated by cohesin and Nipped-B could also play a role in neuronal death. While this seems paradoxical because of the fact that TDP-43 is involved in adult onset neurodegeneration, whereas Nipped-B mutations cause developmental delay, we note that TDP-43 phenotypes are modulated by factors required for development, including EphA4 [14] and Fragile X Mental Retardation Protein (FMRP) [15]. Interestingly, FMRP forms a functional complex with Lark and modulates circadian activity in Drosophila [16]. It will be interesting to determine whether these RNA-binding proteins share common RNA targets that may be under the control of cohesin and Nipped-B at the level of transcription. Given the involvement of TDP-43 in ALS/FTLD, Nipped-B in CdLS, and FMRP in the most common form of inherited mental retardation (Fragile X syndrome), these new findings raise the possibility that cognitive deficits and neuronal dysfunction in these conditions may share common molecular mechanisms whether they occur early or late in life. The future belongs to systems approaches expected to uncover new mechanisms by which DNA- and RNA-binding proteins give each other a helping hand in sculpting the landscape of gene expression regulation during development and in disease.

          Related collections

          Most cited references8

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Identification of Neuronal RNA Targets of TDP-43-containing Ribonucleoprotein Complexes*♦

          TAR DNA-binding protein 43 (TDP-43) is associated with a spectrum of neurodegenerative diseases. Although TDP-43 resembles heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoproteins, its RNA targets and physiological protein partners remain unknown. Here we identify RNA targets of TDP-43 from cortical neurons by RNA immunoprecipitation followed by deep sequencing (RIP-seq). The canonical TDP-43 binding site (TG) n is 55.1-fold enriched, and moreover, a variant with adenine in the middle, (TG) n TA(TG) m , is highly abundant among reads in our TDP-43 RIP-seq library. TDP-43 RNA targets can be divided into three different groups: those primarily binding in introns, in exons, and across both introns and exons. TDP-43 RNA targets are particularly enriched for Gene Ontology terms related to synaptic function, RNA metabolism, and neuronal development. Furthermore, TDP-43 binds to a number of RNAs encoding for proteins implicated in neurodegeneration, including TDP-43 itself, FUS/TLS, progranulin, Tau, and ataxin 1 and -2. We also identify 25 proteins that co-purify with TDP-43 from rodent brain nuclear extracts. Prominent among them are nuclear proteins involved in pre-mRNA splicing and RNA stability and transport. Also notable are two neuron-enriched proteins, methyl CpG-binding protein 2 and polypyrimidine tract-binding protein 2 (PTBP2). A PTBP2 consensus RNA binding motif is enriched in the TDP-43 RIP-seq library, suggesting that PTBP2 may co-regulate TDP-43 RNA targets. This work thus reveals the protein and RNA components of the TDP-43-containing ribonucleoprotein complexes and provides a framework for understanding how dysregulation of TDP-43 in RNA metabolism contributes to neurodegeneration.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            Pathological mechanisms underlying TDP-43 driven neurodegeneration in FTLD–ALS spectrum disorders

            Aggregation of misfolded TAR DNA-binding protein 43 (TDP-43) is a striking hallmark of neurodegenerative processes that are observed in several neurological disorders, and in particular in most patients diagnosed with frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD) or amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). A direct causal link with TDP-43 brain proteinopathy was provided by the identification of pathogenic mutations in TARDBP, the gene encoding TDP-43, in ALS families. However, TDP-43 proteinopathy has also been observed in carriers of mutations in several other genes associated with both ALS and FTLD demonstrating a key role for TDP-43 in neurodegeneration. To date, and despite substantial research into the biology of TDP-43, its functioning in normal brain and in neurodegeneration processes remains largely elusive. Nonetheless, breakthroughs using cellular and animal models have provided valuable insights into ALS and FTLD pathogenesis. Accumulating evidence has redirected the research focus towards a major role for impaired RNA metabolism and protein homeostasis. At the same time, the concept that toxic TDP-43 protein aggregates promote neurodegeneration is losing its credibility. This review aims at highlighting and discussing the current knowledge on TDP-43 driven pathomechanisms leading to neurodegeneration as observed in TDP-43 proteinopathies. Based on the complexity of the associated neurological diseases, a clear understanding of the essential pathological modifications will be crucial for further therapeutic interventions.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Cohesin selectively binds and regulates genes with paused RNA polymerase.

              The cohesin complex mediates sister chromatid cohesion and regulates gene transcription. Prior studies show that cohesin preferentially binds and regulates genes that control growth and differentiation and that even mild disruption of cohesin function alters development. Here we investigate how cohesin specifically recognizes and regulates genes that control development in Drosophila. Genome-wide analyses show that cohesin selectively binds genes in which RNA polymerase II (Pol II) pauses just downstream of the transcription start site. These genes often have GAGA factor (GAF) binding sites 100 base pairs (bp) upstream of the start site, and GT dinucleotide repeats 50 to 800 bp downstream in the plus strand. They have low levels of histone H3 lysine 36 trimethylation (H3K36me3) associated with transcriptional elongation, even when highly transcribed. Cohesin depletion does not reduce polymerase pausing, in contrast to depletion of the NELF (negative elongation factor) pausing complex. Cohesin, NELF, and Spt5 pausing and elongation factor knockdown experiments indicate that cohesin does not inhibit binding of polymerase to promoters or physically block transcriptional elongation, but at genes that it strongly represses, it hinders transition of paused polymerase to elongation at a step distinct from those controlled by Spt5 and NELF. Our findings argue that cohesin and pausing factors are recruited independently to the same genes, perhaps by GAF and the GT repeats, and that their combined action determines the level of actively elongating RNA polymerase. Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: Editor
                Journal
                PLoS Genet
                PLoS Genet
                plos
                plosgen
                PLoS Genetics
                Public Library of Science (San Francisco, CA USA )
                1553-7390
                1553-7404
                17 November 2016
                November 2016
                : 12
                : 11
                : e1006419
                Affiliations
                [001]Departments of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Neuroscience and Neurology, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona
                Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, UNITED STATES
                Author notes

                The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9607-0139
                Article
                PGENETICS-D-16-02086
                10.1371/journal.pgen.1006419
                5147772
                27855157
                7e2d9bf3-4e10-43f0-8916-0586a9053a2f
                © 2016 Coyne, Zarnescu

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

                History
                Page count
                Figures: 1, Tables: 0, Pages: 4
                Funding
                DCZ is supported by grants from the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, and the Muscular Dystrophy Association, US. The funders had no role in the preparation of the article.
                Categories
                Perspective
                Biology and life sciences
                Biochemistry
                Proteins
                RNA-binding proteins
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Genetics
                Gene Expression
                Gene Regulation
                Biology and life sciences
                Genetics
                Gene expression
                DNA transcription
                Biology and life sciences
                Genetics
                Gene expression
                RNA processing
                RNA splicing
                Biology and life sciences
                Biochemistry
                Nucleic acids
                RNA
                RNA processing
                RNA splicing
                Biology and life sciences
                Genetics
                Gene expression
                RNA transport
                Biology and life sciences
                Biochemistry
                Nucleic acids
                RNA
                RNA transport
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Genetics
                Gene Expression
                Biology and life sciences
                Genetics
                Gene expression
                RNA processing
                Biology and life sciences
                Biochemistry
                Nucleic acids
                RNA
                RNA processing
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Genetics
                Gene Expression
                Protein Translation

                Genetics
                Genetics

                Comments

                Comment on this article